{"title":"有效开关B/L的要求:关注KSC概要No.2018Da249018","authors":"WonKeun Lee","doi":"10.18104/kaic.2022.37.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : A Switch B/L refers to a bill that is issued as a substitute for an original B/L but which is not identical in all respects to the bill that it is replacing. In Docket No.2018Da204018, there was a dispute as to the validity of switch B/L which was issued by the freight forwarder at the request of the intermediary without authority from the original B/L’issuer as the carrier. The supreme court of Korea ruled that this B/L can not be regarded as valid B/L under the Korean Law. This article analyses Docket No.2018Da204018 according to the English law, and proposes some recommendations for the carrier, when he issues the switch B/L. \nResearch design, data, methodology : This article adopts the legal methodology which utilizes textbooks, journal articles, electronic resources, UK COGSA(1992), and several cases from the English court. \nResults : This article finds that, under the English law, three requirements for an effective switch B/L are a proper requester, a proper issuer, and a legitimacy reason for issuing the switch B/L. Thus, this article concludes that the switch B/L in Docket No.2018da204018 shall not be recognized as a valid B/L, because it clearly lacked the second requirement naming a proper issuer. \nConclusions : The carrier potentially has greater liability over issuing the switch B/L than the requester. Therefore, when issuing the switch B/L, it is crucial for the carrier to verify the requester, obtain a legitimacy reason for issuing the switch B/L, and to insist upon surrendering the original B/L..","PeriodicalId":368687,"journal":{"name":"Korean Academy Of International Commerce","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Requirements for an Effective Switch B/L: Focusing on The KSC Docket No.2018Da249018\",\"authors\":\"WonKeun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.18104/kaic.2022.37.2.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose : A Switch B/L refers to a bill that is issued as a substitute for an original B/L but which is not identical in all respects to the bill that it is replacing. In Docket No.2018Da204018, there was a dispute as to the validity of switch B/L which was issued by the freight forwarder at the request of the intermediary without authority from the original B/L’issuer as the carrier. The supreme court of Korea ruled that this B/L can not be regarded as valid B/L under the Korean Law. This article analyses Docket No.2018Da204018 according to the English law, and proposes some recommendations for the carrier, when he issues the switch B/L. \\nResearch design, data, methodology : This article adopts the legal methodology which utilizes textbooks, journal articles, electronic resources, UK COGSA(1992), and several cases from the English court. \\nResults : This article finds that, under the English law, three requirements for an effective switch B/L are a proper requester, a proper issuer, and a legitimacy reason for issuing the switch B/L. Thus, this article concludes that the switch B/L in Docket No.2018da204018 shall not be recognized as a valid B/L, because it clearly lacked the second requirement naming a proper issuer. \\nConclusions : The carrier potentially has greater liability over issuing the switch B/L than the requester. Therefore, when issuing the switch B/L, it is crucial for the carrier to verify the requester, obtain a legitimacy reason for issuing the switch B/L, and to insist upon surrendering the original B/L..\",\"PeriodicalId\":368687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Academy Of International Commerce\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Academy Of International Commerce\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18104/kaic.2022.37.2.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Academy Of International Commerce","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18104/kaic.2022.37.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Requirements for an Effective Switch B/L: Focusing on The KSC Docket No.2018Da249018
Purpose : A Switch B/L refers to a bill that is issued as a substitute for an original B/L but which is not identical in all respects to the bill that it is replacing. In Docket No.2018Da204018, there was a dispute as to the validity of switch B/L which was issued by the freight forwarder at the request of the intermediary without authority from the original B/L’issuer as the carrier. The supreme court of Korea ruled that this B/L can not be regarded as valid B/L under the Korean Law. This article analyses Docket No.2018Da204018 according to the English law, and proposes some recommendations for the carrier, when he issues the switch B/L.
Research design, data, methodology : This article adopts the legal methodology which utilizes textbooks, journal articles, electronic resources, UK COGSA(1992), and several cases from the English court.
Results : This article finds that, under the English law, three requirements for an effective switch B/L are a proper requester, a proper issuer, and a legitimacy reason for issuing the switch B/L. Thus, this article concludes that the switch B/L in Docket No.2018da204018 shall not be recognized as a valid B/L, because it clearly lacked the second requirement naming a proper issuer.
Conclusions : The carrier potentially has greater liability over issuing the switch B/L than the requester. Therefore, when issuing the switch B/L, it is crucial for the carrier to verify the requester, obtain a legitimacy reason for issuing the switch B/L, and to insist upon surrendering the original B/L..