有效开关B/L的要求:关注KSC概要No.2018Da249018

WonKeun Lee
{"title":"有效开关B/L的要求:关注KSC概要No.2018Da249018","authors":"WonKeun Lee","doi":"10.18104/kaic.2022.37.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : A Switch B/L refers to a bill that is issued as a substitute for an original B/L but which is not identical in all respects to the bill that it is replacing. In Docket No.2018Da204018, there was a dispute as to the validity of switch B/L which was issued by the freight forwarder at the request of the intermediary without authority from the original B/L’issuer as the carrier. The supreme court of Korea ruled that this B/L can not be regarded as valid B/L under the Korean Law. This article analyses Docket No.2018Da204018 according to the English law, and proposes some recommendations for the carrier, when he issues the switch B/L. \nResearch design, data, methodology : This article adopts the legal methodology which utilizes textbooks, journal articles, electronic resources, UK COGSA(1992), and several cases from the English court. \nResults : This article finds that, under the English law, three requirements for an effective switch B/L are a proper requester, a proper issuer, and a legitimacy reason for issuing the switch B/L. Thus, this article concludes that the switch B/L in Docket No.2018da204018 shall not be recognized as a valid B/L, because it clearly lacked the second requirement naming a proper issuer. \nConclusions : The carrier potentially has greater liability over issuing the switch B/L than the requester. Therefore, when issuing the switch B/L, it is crucial for the carrier to verify the requester, obtain a legitimacy reason for issuing the switch B/L, and to insist upon surrendering the original B/L..","PeriodicalId":368687,"journal":{"name":"Korean Academy Of International Commerce","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Requirements for an Effective Switch B/L: Focusing on The KSC Docket No.2018Da249018\",\"authors\":\"WonKeun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.18104/kaic.2022.37.2.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose : A Switch B/L refers to a bill that is issued as a substitute for an original B/L but which is not identical in all respects to the bill that it is replacing. In Docket No.2018Da204018, there was a dispute as to the validity of switch B/L which was issued by the freight forwarder at the request of the intermediary without authority from the original B/L’issuer as the carrier. The supreme court of Korea ruled that this B/L can not be regarded as valid B/L under the Korean Law. This article analyses Docket No.2018Da204018 according to the English law, and proposes some recommendations for the carrier, when he issues the switch B/L. \\nResearch design, data, methodology : This article adopts the legal methodology which utilizes textbooks, journal articles, electronic resources, UK COGSA(1992), and several cases from the English court. \\nResults : This article finds that, under the English law, three requirements for an effective switch B/L are a proper requester, a proper issuer, and a legitimacy reason for issuing the switch B/L. Thus, this article concludes that the switch B/L in Docket No.2018da204018 shall not be recognized as a valid B/L, because it clearly lacked the second requirement naming a proper issuer. \\nConclusions : The carrier potentially has greater liability over issuing the switch B/L than the requester. Therefore, when issuing the switch B/L, it is crucial for the carrier to verify the requester, obtain a legitimacy reason for issuing the switch B/L, and to insist upon surrendering the original B/L..\",\"PeriodicalId\":368687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Academy Of International Commerce\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Academy Of International Commerce\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18104/kaic.2022.37.2.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Academy Of International Commerce","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18104/kaic.2022.37.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用途:交换提单是指签发的替代正本提单,但在所有方面与被替换的提单不完全相同的提单。在第2018da204018号摘要中,货运代理在未经原开证人作为承运人授权的情况下,应中介的要求出具了转换提单,该转换提单的有效性存在争议。韩国大法院裁定,根据韩国法律,该提单不能视为有效提单。本文根据英国法律对2018da204018号摘要进行了分析,并对承运人开具转换提单提出了一些建议。研究设计、数据、方法:本文采用法律方法论,利用教科书、期刊文章、电子资源、英国COGSA(1992)和英国法院的几个案例。结果:本文发现,在英国法律下,有效的转换提单的三个要求是合适的请求人,合适的开证人,以及签发转换提单的合法性理由。因此,本文的结论是,Docket No.2018da204018中的交换提单不应被认为是有效的提单,因为它显然缺乏第二个要求,即指定适当的开证人。结论:承运人在签发交换机提单方面可能比请求方负有更大的责任。因此,在开换提单时,承运人核实请求人,获得开换提单的合法理由,并坚持交出正本提单是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Requirements for an Effective Switch B/L: Focusing on The KSC Docket No.2018Da249018
Purpose : A Switch B/L refers to a bill that is issued as a substitute for an original B/L but which is not identical in all respects to the bill that it is replacing. In Docket No.2018Da204018, there was a dispute as to the validity of switch B/L which was issued by the freight forwarder at the request of the intermediary without authority from the original B/L’issuer as the carrier. The supreme court of Korea ruled that this B/L can not be regarded as valid B/L under the Korean Law. This article analyses Docket No.2018Da204018 according to the English law, and proposes some recommendations for the carrier, when he issues the switch B/L. Research design, data, methodology : This article adopts the legal methodology which utilizes textbooks, journal articles, electronic resources, UK COGSA(1992), and several cases from the English court. Results : This article finds that, under the English law, three requirements for an effective switch B/L are a proper requester, a proper issuer, and a legitimacy reason for issuing the switch B/L. Thus, this article concludes that the switch B/L in Docket No.2018da204018 shall not be recognized as a valid B/L, because it clearly lacked the second requirement naming a proper issuer. Conclusions : The carrier potentially has greater liability over issuing the switch B/L than the requester. Therefore, when issuing the switch B/L, it is crucial for the carrier to verify the requester, obtain a legitimacy reason for issuing the switch B/L, and to insist upon surrendering the original B/L..
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信