自动驾驶中的隐私和初始信息。信息需求和数据共享问题的评估

Johanna Josten, Teresa Schmidt, R. Philipsen, L. Eckstein, M. Ziefle
{"title":"自动驾驶中的隐私和初始信息。信息需求和数据共享问题的评估","authors":"Johanna Josten, Teresa Schmidt, R. Philipsen, L. Eckstein, M. Ziefle","doi":"10.1109/IVS.2017.7995774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the results of an online questionnaire (N=130) focusing on the impact of initial information for novel systems in two different automation levels. Willingness to share data and privacy concerns were compared between partial and conditional automation. With initial information on system limits manipulated between participants, differences in a priori attitudes and information relevance were analyzed. General attitude towards automation was positive. Willingness to share data when using automation was independent of ADAS experience and automation level. All driver-related data were not considered as sharable. Information relevance was highest for information on the anticipation of take-over situations, with information on certainty of successful situation management being significantly more important if system limits were unspecific. Results provide input for studies analyzing the influence of initial information and online information on take-over performance as well as on willingness to share data when receiving higher levels of automation in return.","PeriodicalId":143367,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","volume":"468 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy and initial information in automated driving — Evaluation of information demands and data sharing concerns\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Josten, Teresa Schmidt, R. Philipsen, L. Eckstein, M. Ziefle\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IVS.2017.7995774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the results of an online questionnaire (N=130) focusing on the impact of initial information for novel systems in two different automation levels. Willingness to share data and privacy concerns were compared between partial and conditional automation. With initial information on system limits manipulated between participants, differences in a priori attitudes and information relevance were analyzed. General attitude towards automation was positive. Willingness to share data when using automation was independent of ADAS experience and automation level. All driver-related data were not considered as sharable. Information relevance was highest for information on the anticipation of take-over situations, with information on certainty of successful situation management being significantly more important if system limits were unspecific. Results provide input for studies analyzing the influence of initial information and online information on take-over performance as well as on willingness to share data when receiving higher levels of automation in return.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)\",\"volume\":\"468 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2017.7995774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2017.7995774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文提出了一份在线调查问卷(N=130)的结果,重点关注初始信息对两种不同自动化水平的新系统的影响。在部分自动化和条件自动化之间比较了共享数据的意愿和隐私问题。通过对系统限制的初始信息在参与者之间进行操纵,分析了先验态度和信息相关性的差异。对自动化的总体态度是积极的。在使用自动化时是否愿意共享数据与ADAS经验和自动化水平无关。所有与驾驶员相关的数据都不被认为是可共享的。对接管情况的预期信息的信息相关性最高,如果系统限制不具体,则成功情况管理的确定性信息显着更重要。结果为分析初始信息和在线信息对接管绩效的影响以及在获得更高水平自动化回报时共享数据的意愿的研究提供了输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Privacy and initial information in automated driving — Evaluation of information demands and data sharing concerns
This paper presents the results of an online questionnaire (N=130) focusing on the impact of initial information for novel systems in two different automation levels. Willingness to share data and privacy concerns were compared between partial and conditional automation. With initial information on system limits manipulated between participants, differences in a priori attitudes and information relevance were analyzed. General attitude towards automation was positive. Willingness to share data when using automation was independent of ADAS experience and automation level. All driver-related data were not considered as sharable. Information relevance was highest for information on the anticipation of take-over situations, with information on certainty of successful situation management being significantly more important if system limits were unspecific. Results provide input for studies analyzing the influence of initial information and online information on take-over performance as well as on willingness to share data when receiving higher levels of automation in return.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信