同侧乳房肿瘤复发的手术选择:乳房切除术与重复保乳手术

H. Yeoh, J. Cheun, Han-Byoel Lee, W. Han, Hong-Kyu Kim
{"title":"同侧乳房肿瘤复发的手术选择:乳房切除术与重复保乳手术","authors":"H. Yeoh, J. Cheun, Han-Byoel Lee, W. Han, Hong-Kyu Kim","doi":"10.14449/jbd.2022.10.1.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The standard care for patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a total mastectomy (TM); however, there is growing interest in repeating BCS for IBTR.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with IBTR who underwent initial BCS for breast cancer at our institution between January 2000 and December 2018. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival rates between the standard BCS-TM treatment group and the repeat-BCS group.Results: We enrolled 209 IBTR patients with a median follow-up of 102.3 months. No significant differences were observed in overall survival (10 years: 87.3% vs. 78.8%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-2.81; p=0.821), distant metastasis free survival (10 years: 73.9% vs. 77.7%; HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.37-1.72; p=0.727) and disease-free survival (10 years: 57.1% vs. 65.2%; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.35-1.12; p=0.115) between two groups. Repeat-BCS group showed significantly poorer locoregional recurrence free survival rate than did the TM group (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.06-5.56; p=0.029) but the significance was not shown after excluding ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence events.Conclusion: No significant differences were observed in survival outcomes and recurrence rates between patients with IBTR who underwent mastectomy or repeat BCS regardless of molecular subtype, except secondary IBTR rates.","PeriodicalId":245382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Disease","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Options for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence: Mastectomy Versus Repeat Breast-Conserving Surgery\",\"authors\":\"H. Yeoh, J. Cheun, Han-Byoel Lee, W. Han, Hong-Kyu Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.14449/jbd.2022.10.1.53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The standard care for patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a total mastectomy (TM); however, there is growing interest in repeating BCS for IBTR.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with IBTR who underwent initial BCS for breast cancer at our institution between January 2000 and December 2018. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival rates between the standard BCS-TM treatment group and the repeat-BCS group.Results: We enrolled 209 IBTR patients with a median follow-up of 102.3 months. No significant differences were observed in overall survival (10 years: 87.3% vs. 78.8%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-2.81; p=0.821), distant metastasis free survival (10 years: 73.9% vs. 77.7%; HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.37-1.72; p=0.727) and disease-free survival (10 years: 57.1% vs. 65.2%; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.35-1.12; p=0.115) between two groups. Repeat-BCS group showed significantly poorer locoregional recurrence free survival rate than did the TM group (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.06-5.56; p=0.029) but the significance was not shown after excluding ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence events.Conclusion: No significant differences were observed in survival outcomes and recurrence rates between patients with IBTR who underwent mastectomy or repeat BCS regardless of molecular subtype, except secondary IBTR rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Breast Disease\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Breast Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14449/jbd.2022.10.1.53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14449/jbd.2022.10.1.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:保乳手术(BCS)后同侧乳腺肿瘤复发(IBTR)患者的标准治疗是全乳切除术(TM);然而,越来越多的人对在IBTR中重复BCS感兴趣。方法:我们回顾性分析了2000年1月至2018年12月期间在我院接受乳腺癌初始BCS治疗的IBTR患者。采用Kaplan-Meier法比较标准BCS-TM治疗组与重复bcs治疗组的生存率。结果:我们招募了209例IBTR患者,中位随访时间为102.3个月。总生存率无显著差异(10年:87.3% vs. 78.8%;风险比[HR], 1.11;95%置信区间[CI], 0.44-2.81;P =0.821),无远处转移生存率(10年:73.9% vs. 77.7%;人力资源,0.80;95% ci, 0.37-1.72;P =0.727)和无病生存率(10年:57.1% vs. 65.2%;人力资源,0.63;95% ci, 0.35-1.12;P =0.115)。Repeat-BCS组的局部无复发生存率明显低于TM组(HR, 2.44;95% ci, 1.06-5.56;P =0.029),但在排除同侧乳房肿瘤复发事件后,差异无统计学意义。结论:除继发性IBTR率外,接受乳房切除术或重复BCS的IBTR患者的生存结局和复发率无显著差异,无论分子亚型如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical Options for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence: Mastectomy Versus Repeat Breast-Conserving Surgery
Purpose: The standard care for patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a total mastectomy (TM); however, there is growing interest in repeating BCS for IBTR.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with IBTR who underwent initial BCS for breast cancer at our institution between January 2000 and December 2018. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival rates between the standard BCS-TM treatment group and the repeat-BCS group.Results: We enrolled 209 IBTR patients with a median follow-up of 102.3 months. No significant differences were observed in overall survival (10 years: 87.3% vs. 78.8%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-2.81; p=0.821), distant metastasis free survival (10 years: 73.9% vs. 77.7%; HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.37-1.72; p=0.727) and disease-free survival (10 years: 57.1% vs. 65.2%; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.35-1.12; p=0.115) between two groups. Repeat-BCS group showed significantly poorer locoregional recurrence free survival rate than did the TM group (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.06-5.56; p=0.029) but the significance was not shown after excluding ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence events.Conclusion: No significant differences were observed in survival outcomes and recurrence rates between patients with IBTR who underwent mastectomy or repeat BCS regardless of molecular subtype, except secondary IBTR rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信