{"title":"理解政治转变和模仿竞争","authors":"T. Bar-On","doi":"10.1080/14690760903396351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the French nouvelle droite under its doyen Alain de Benoist claimed that it had made a political ‘conversion’ from the revolutionary Right (or conservative revolutionary) milieu to ‘democracy’ and that it had created a ‘post‐fascist’ political synthesis. The paper under consideration will argue that the nouvelle droite’s political ‘conversion’ process was only exoteric in nature by mimicking the ideas of the New Left and that its esoteric orientation was of ‘true believers’ who never left a political pantheon of conservative revolutionary ideas with roots largely in the 1920s and 1930s. Using the model of the nouvelle droite, as well as the ideas of René Girard and Emilio Gentile in respect of mimetic rivalry between Right and Left and ‘political religion’ respectively, I examine other intellectual political conversions of the twentieth century from Benito Mussolini to Christopher Hitchens. Using these aforementioned examples, I trace a model of political conversion for the twentieth century and new millennium, with particular emphasis on conversionary prerequisites and processes, as well as the mimetic symbiosis and rivalry between Right and Left. I conclude that even in a secular age our political conversions involve both mimicry and syncretism vis‐à‐vis traditional religious conversion experiences, but they are generally short‐lived due to crises, collapse, generational change or ideological attrition.","PeriodicalId":440652,"journal":{"name":"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Political Conversion and Mimetic Rivalry\",\"authors\":\"T. Bar-On\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14690760903396351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the French nouvelle droite under its doyen Alain de Benoist claimed that it had made a political ‘conversion’ from the revolutionary Right (or conservative revolutionary) milieu to ‘democracy’ and that it had created a ‘post‐fascist’ political synthesis. The paper under consideration will argue that the nouvelle droite’s political ‘conversion’ process was only exoteric in nature by mimicking the ideas of the New Left and that its esoteric orientation was of ‘true believers’ who never left a political pantheon of conservative revolutionary ideas with roots largely in the 1920s and 1930s. Using the model of the nouvelle droite, as well as the ideas of René Girard and Emilio Gentile in respect of mimetic rivalry between Right and Left and ‘political religion’ respectively, I examine other intellectual political conversions of the twentieth century from Benito Mussolini to Christopher Hitchens. Using these aforementioned examples, I trace a model of political conversion for the twentieth century and new millennium, with particular emphasis on conversionary prerequisites and processes, as well as the mimetic symbiosis and rivalry between Right and Left. I conclude that even in a secular age our political conversions involve both mimicry and syncretism vis‐à‐vis traditional religious conversion experiences, but they are generally short‐lived due to crises, collapse, generational change or ideological attrition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14690760903396351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14690760903396351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
在20世纪80年代末和90年代初,法国新派在其前辈阿兰·德·贝诺伊斯特(Alain de Benoist)的领导下声称,它已经从革命的右翼(或保守的革命)环境转变为“民主”,并创造了一个“后法西斯”的政治综合体。正在考虑的论文将认为,新派的政治“转变”过程只是通过模仿新左派的思想而在本质上是开放的,其深奥的方向是“真正的信徒”,他们从未离开过主要植根于20世纪20年代和30年代的保守革命思想的政治万神殿。利用新派的模式,以及ren Girard和Emilio Gentile关于左右派和“政治宗教”之间的模仿竞争的观点,我考察了20世纪从贝尼托·墨索里尼到克里斯托弗·希钦斯的其他知识分子的政治转变。通过上述这些例子,我追踪了二十世纪和新千年的政治转变模式,特别强调了转变的先决条件和过程,以及左右之间的模仿共生和竞争。我的结论是,即使在世俗时代,我们的政治皈依也涉及到对传统宗教皈依经验的模仿和融合,但由于危机、崩溃、代际变化或意识形态消耗,它们通常是短暂的。
Understanding Political Conversion and Mimetic Rivalry
Abstract In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the French nouvelle droite under its doyen Alain de Benoist claimed that it had made a political ‘conversion’ from the revolutionary Right (or conservative revolutionary) milieu to ‘democracy’ and that it had created a ‘post‐fascist’ political synthesis. The paper under consideration will argue that the nouvelle droite’s political ‘conversion’ process was only exoteric in nature by mimicking the ideas of the New Left and that its esoteric orientation was of ‘true believers’ who never left a political pantheon of conservative revolutionary ideas with roots largely in the 1920s and 1930s. Using the model of the nouvelle droite, as well as the ideas of René Girard and Emilio Gentile in respect of mimetic rivalry between Right and Left and ‘political religion’ respectively, I examine other intellectual political conversions of the twentieth century from Benito Mussolini to Christopher Hitchens. Using these aforementioned examples, I trace a model of political conversion for the twentieth century and new millennium, with particular emphasis on conversionary prerequisites and processes, as well as the mimetic symbiosis and rivalry between Right and Left. I conclude that even in a secular age our political conversions involve both mimicry and syncretism vis‐à‐vis traditional religious conversion experiences, but they are generally short‐lived due to crises, collapse, generational change or ideological attrition.