厚的还是薄的?组织行为学的一个基本问题

N. Ashkanasy
{"title":"厚的还是薄的?组织行为学的一个基本问题","authors":"N. Ashkanasy","doi":"10.1108/S1475-9144(2009)0000008002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In their essay, Yammarino and Dansereau (2009) present a new multilevel theory of organizational behavior (OB), based on the idea that simplest solutions are usually the best. This commentary discusses the strengths and shortcomings of their essay and suggests some alternative strategies. In particular, it identifies three core areas for discussion. The first is that the authors set out a “thin” theory, at odds with the idea that OB in real organizations is inherently complex and addressable only through “thick” descriptions. Second, while the theory covers four levels of analysis, the authors may have neglected the time dimension. Third, the theory is an example of “grand” theorizing, suggesting it may also share the disappointing fate of such theories in the past.","PeriodicalId":277029,"journal":{"name":"Research in Multi Level Issues","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THICK OR THIN? A FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR\",\"authors\":\"N. Ashkanasy\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/S1475-9144(2009)0000008002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In their essay, Yammarino and Dansereau (2009) present a new multilevel theory of organizational behavior (OB), based on the idea that simplest solutions are usually the best. This commentary discusses the strengths and shortcomings of their essay and suggests some alternative strategies. In particular, it identifies three core areas for discussion. The first is that the authors set out a “thin” theory, at odds with the idea that OB in real organizations is inherently complex and addressable only through “thick” descriptions. Second, while the theory covers four levels of analysis, the authors may have neglected the time dimension. Third, the theory is an example of “grand” theorizing, suggesting it may also share the disappointing fate of such theories in the past.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Multi Level Issues\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Multi Level Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1475-9144(2009)0000008002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Multi Level Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1475-9144(2009)0000008002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在他们的文章中,Yammarino和Dansereau(2009)提出了一个新的多层次组织行为理论(OB),基于最简单的解决方案通常是最好的想法。这篇评论讨论了他们的文章的优点和缺点,并提出了一些可供选择的策略。特别地,它确定了三个需要讨论的核心领域。首先,作者提出了一个“薄”的理论,这与现实组织中的OB本质上是复杂的,只能通过“厚”的描述来解决的观点不一致。其次,虽然该理论涵盖了四个层次的分析,但作者可能忽略了时间维度。第三,该理论是“宏大”理论化的一个例子,这表明它可能也会像过去的理论一样遭遇令人失望的命运。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THICK OR THIN? A FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
In their essay, Yammarino and Dansereau (2009) present a new multilevel theory of organizational behavior (OB), based on the idea that simplest solutions are usually the best. This commentary discusses the strengths and shortcomings of their essay and suggests some alternative strategies. In particular, it identifies three core areas for discussion. The first is that the authors set out a “thin” theory, at odds with the idea that OB in real organizations is inherently complex and addressable only through “thick” descriptions. Second, while the theory covers four levels of analysis, the authors may have neglected the time dimension. Third, the theory is an example of “grand” theorizing, suggesting it may also share the disappointing fate of such theories in the past.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信