同行评审

Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference Pub Date : 2014-06-21 DOI:10.1145/2713609.2713612

D. Clarke, T. Clear, Kathi Fisler, Matthias Hauswirth, S. Krishnamurthi, J. Politz, V. Tirronen, Tobias Wrigstad

{"title":"同行评审","authors":"D. Clarke, T. Clear, Kathi Fisler, Matthias Hauswirth, S. Krishnamurthi, J. Politz, V. Tirronen, Tobias Wrigstad","doi":"10.1145/2713609.2713612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peer-review is a valuable tool that helps both the reviewee, who receives feedback about his work, and the reviewer, who sees different potential solutions and improves her ability to critique work. In-flow peer-review (IFPR) is peer-review done while an assignment is in progress. Peer-review done during this time is likely to result in greater motivation for both reviewer and reviewee. This workinggroup report summarizes IFPR and discusses numerous dimensions of the process, each of which alleviates some problems while raising associated concerns.","PeriodicalId":162845,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-Flow Peer Review\",\"authors\":\"D. Clarke, T. Clear, Kathi Fisler, Matthias Hauswirth, S. Krishnamurthi, J. Politz, V. Tirronen, Tobias Wrigstad\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2713609.2713612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peer-review is a valuable tool that helps both the reviewee, who receives feedback about his work, and the reviewer, who sees different potential solutions and improves her ability to critique work. In-flow peer-review (IFPR) is peer-review done while an assignment is in progress. Peer-review done during this time is likely to result in greater motivation for both reviewer and reviewee. This workinggroup report summarizes IFPR and discusses numerous dimensions of the process, each of which alleviates some problems while raising associated concerns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2713609.2713612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2713609.2713612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

摘要

同行评议是一种很有价值的工具，它既可以帮助审稿人收到有关其工作的反馈，也可以帮助审稿人看到不同的潜在解决方案，并提高其批评工作的能力。in -flow peer-review (IFPR)是在作业进行过程中进行的同行评审。在此期间进行的同行评议可能会给审稿人和被审稿人带来更大的动力。本工作组报告总结了IFPR，并讨论了该过程的许多方面，每个方面都缓解了一些问题，同时提出了相关的关切。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

In-Flow Peer Review

Peer-review is a valuable tool that helps both the reviewee, who receives feedback about his work, and the reviewer, who sees different potential solutions and improves her ability to critique work. In-flow peer-review (IFPR) is peer-review done while an assignment is in progress. Peer-review done during this time is likely to result in greater motivation for both reviewer and reviewee. This workinggroup report summarizes IFPR and discusses numerous dimensions of the process, each of which alleviates some problems while raising associated concerns.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference

自引率

0.00%

发文量