A. Afonso, Joana Silva, Ricardo Silva, Vânia Pacheco, Vítor Pinheiro, I. Antunes, M. Gonçalo
{"title":"职业性铬过敏与接触性皮炎:10年的演变","authors":"A. Afonso, Joana Silva, Ricardo Silva, Vânia Pacheco, Vítor Pinheiro, I. Antunes, M. Gonçalo","doi":"10.29021/spdv.79.3.1356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Chromium has been responsible for occupational skin disease, both irritant and/or allergic contact dermatitis. In order to minimize this problem, regulatory measures limiting its use have been implemented. The impact of these regulations should be monitored over time. \n Material and Methods: A retrospective study from 2009 to 2018 was carried out in the Department of Dermatology to assess the temporal trend of chromium sensitization evaluated by patch testing with potassium dichromate 0.5% pet, particularly considering age, sex and its relationship with occupational activity. \nResults: 3277 individuals were studied, 2369 females (72.29%) and 908 males (27.71%). Of those 621 (18.95%) fulfilled criteria for occupational contact dermatitis. Chromium allergy was found in 118 (3.60%) patients, 64 females (54.4%) and 54 males (45.76%). We found that male patients were significantly more frequent (45.76% vs 27.03%; p<0.001), as well as occupational dermatitis (31.35% vs 18.47%; p<0.001), hand dermatitis (53.54% vs 23.52%; p<0.001) and age above 40 years (70.34% vs 56.76%; p=0.003). \nDiscussion/Conclusion: The results show a high prevalence (3.60%) of chromium positive patch tests. In our study, there has not been a significant decrease in sensitization to chromium over the years. Interestingly cases classically related to this allergy (cement in the building industry) are no longer the main cause of the problem. We found other sources such as leather as a main cause of allergic sensitization, suggesting a change of the panorama.","PeriodicalId":238976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational Chromium Allergy and Contact Dermatitis: 10 Years Evolution\",\"authors\":\"A. Afonso, Joana Silva, Ricardo Silva, Vânia Pacheco, Vítor Pinheiro, I. Antunes, M. Gonçalo\",\"doi\":\"10.29021/spdv.79.3.1356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Chromium has been responsible for occupational skin disease, both irritant and/or allergic contact dermatitis. In order to minimize this problem, regulatory measures limiting its use have been implemented. The impact of these regulations should be monitored over time. \\n Material and Methods: A retrospective study from 2009 to 2018 was carried out in the Department of Dermatology to assess the temporal trend of chromium sensitization evaluated by patch testing with potassium dichromate 0.5% pet, particularly considering age, sex and its relationship with occupational activity. \\nResults: 3277 individuals were studied, 2369 females (72.29%) and 908 males (27.71%). Of those 621 (18.95%) fulfilled criteria for occupational contact dermatitis. Chromium allergy was found in 118 (3.60%) patients, 64 females (54.4%) and 54 males (45.76%). We found that male patients were significantly more frequent (45.76% vs 27.03%; p<0.001), as well as occupational dermatitis (31.35% vs 18.47%; p<0.001), hand dermatitis (53.54% vs 23.52%; p<0.001) and age above 40 years (70.34% vs 56.76%; p=0.003). \\nDiscussion/Conclusion: The results show a high prevalence (3.60%) of chromium positive patch tests. In our study, there has not been a significant decrease in sensitization to chromium over the years. Interestingly cases classically related to this allergy (cement in the building industry) are no longer the main cause of the problem. We found other sources such as leather as a main cause of allergic sensitization, suggesting a change of the panorama.\",\"PeriodicalId\":238976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.79.3.1356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.79.3.1356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:铬是职业性皮肤病的主要原因,包括刺激性和/或过敏性接触性皮炎。为了尽量减少这一问题,已经实施了限制其使用的监管措施。这些规定的影响应该长期监测。材料与方法:2009年至2018年,在皮肤科进行回顾性研究,评估0.5%重铬酸钾pet贴片试验评估铬致敏的时间趋势,特别考虑年龄、性别及其与职业活动的关系。结果:共调查个体3277只,其中雌性2369只(72.29%),雄性908只(27.71%)。其中621例(18.95%)符合职业性接触性皮炎的诊断标准。铬过敏118例(3.60%),其中女性64例(54.4%),男性54例(45.76%)。我们发现男性患者的发生率明显更高(45.76% vs 27.03%;P <0.001),以及职业性皮炎(31.35% vs 18.47%;P <0.001),手皮炎(53.54% vs 23.52%;P <0.001),年龄大于40岁(70.34% vs 56.76%;p = 0.003)。讨论/结论:结果显示铬阳性斑贴试验阳性率较高(3.60%)。在我们的研究中,多年来对铬的敏化没有显著降低。有趣的是,与这种过敏有关的经典病例(建筑行业的水泥)不再是问题的主要原因。我们发现其他来源,如皮革过敏性致敏的主要原因,表明全景的变化。
Occupational Chromium Allergy and Contact Dermatitis: 10 Years Evolution
Introduction: Chromium has been responsible for occupational skin disease, both irritant and/or allergic contact dermatitis. In order to minimize this problem, regulatory measures limiting its use have been implemented. The impact of these regulations should be monitored over time.
Material and Methods: A retrospective study from 2009 to 2018 was carried out in the Department of Dermatology to assess the temporal trend of chromium sensitization evaluated by patch testing with potassium dichromate 0.5% pet, particularly considering age, sex and its relationship with occupational activity.
Results: 3277 individuals were studied, 2369 females (72.29%) and 908 males (27.71%). Of those 621 (18.95%) fulfilled criteria for occupational contact dermatitis. Chromium allergy was found in 118 (3.60%) patients, 64 females (54.4%) and 54 males (45.76%). We found that male patients were significantly more frequent (45.76% vs 27.03%; p<0.001), as well as occupational dermatitis (31.35% vs 18.47%; p<0.001), hand dermatitis (53.54% vs 23.52%; p<0.001) and age above 40 years (70.34% vs 56.76%; p=0.003).
Discussion/Conclusion: The results show a high prevalence (3.60%) of chromium positive patch tests. In our study, there has not been a significant decrease in sensitization to chromium over the years. Interestingly cases classically related to this allergy (cement in the building industry) are no longer the main cause of the problem. We found other sources such as leather as a main cause of allergic sensitization, suggesting a change of the panorama.