Kadapa, GGH不安全堕胎的流行、干预和结果的横断面调查

Dr. Bukkittu Ramya, Dr. B.V. Chitra Ravali, Dr. Rabbani Begum
{"title":"Kadapa, GGH不安全堕胎的流行、干预和结果的横断面调查","authors":"Dr. Bukkittu Ramya, Dr. B.V. Chitra Ravali, Dr. Rabbani Begum","doi":"10.36348/sijog.2022.v05i11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Unsafe abortions among the various age groups of women due to unintended pregnancy and socio- economic constraints have a deleterious effect on their reproductive and mental health. Hence, review and modification of safe abortion practices are crucial, owing to the rampant availability of over-the-counter MTP kits and D&C by unskilled professionals resulting in Maternal Mortality and Morbidity. This study provides an estimate of the outcomes of unsafe abortions. Methods: WHO [1] defines unsafe abortion as the termination of a pregnancy by people lacking the necessary skills, or in an environment lacking minimal medical standards, or both. The present study is a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of outcomes of unsafe abortions at a tertiary care center, GGH Kadapa. The study data includes all the women admitted to the emergency obstetric unit and treated for unsafe abortions between January 2019 to June 2020. Age group of the selected population is between 15-45. The sample included 342 cases of recent induced abortions. The primary outcome of the study is to emphasise the burden, causes, setting and the morbidity of unsafe abortions. Results: Total number of deliveries that occurred between Jan 2019 to June 2020 is 13787 and the total number of induced abortions during this period was 342. Out of which, 211(61.7%) were unsafe abortions. Among them, 53 women (25.11%) presented with shock. 89 women (42.1%) needed blood transfusions. 8 (3.79%) women went into DIC. One woman had a uterine rupture, and underwent uterine rent repair. Four women had uterine perforation with associated bowel injury. Bowel repair was done in 1 case, and a colostomy was required in 3 cases. Emergency laparotomy was performed in these 5 cases. Conclusion: Unsafe abortions are one of the leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity in a developing country like India. This is mainly attributed to socio-economic constraints, poor awareness of contraception, and cultural beliefs against sterilization forcing the pregnant women to indulge in unsafe abortion practices. Creating contraception awareness in reproductive age group, strict laws against unsafe abortion practices are to be implemented to reduce the maternal morbidity and mortality due to unsafe abortions.","PeriodicalId":394508,"journal":{"name":"Scholars International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cross-Sectional Survey on Prevalence, Interventions, and Outcomes of Unsafe Abortions in GGH, Kadapa\",\"authors\":\"Dr. Bukkittu Ramya, Dr. B.V. Chitra Ravali, Dr. Rabbani Begum\",\"doi\":\"10.36348/sijog.2022.v05i11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Unsafe abortions among the various age groups of women due to unintended pregnancy and socio- economic constraints have a deleterious effect on their reproductive and mental health. Hence, review and modification of safe abortion practices are crucial, owing to the rampant availability of over-the-counter MTP kits and D&C by unskilled professionals resulting in Maternal Mortality and Morbidity. This study provides an estimate of the outcomes of unsafe abortions. Methods: WHO [1] defines unsafe abortion as the termination of a pregnancy by people lacking the necessary skills, or in an environment lacking minimal medical standards, or both. The present study is a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of outcomes of unsafe abortions at a tertiary care center, GGH Kadapa. The study data includes all the women admitted to the emergency obstetric unit and treated for unsafe abortions between January 2019 to June 2020. Age group of the selected population is between 15-45. The sample included 342 cases of recent induced abortions. The primary outcome of the study is to emphasise the burden, causes, setting and the morbidity of unsafe abortions. Results: Total number of deliveries that occurred between Jan 2019 to June 2020 is 13787 and the total number of induced abortions during this period was 342. Out of which, 211(61.7%) were unsafe abortions. Among them, 53 women (25.11%) presented with shock. 89 women (42.1%) needed blood transfusions. 8 (3.79%) women went into DIC. One woman had a uterine rupture, and underwent uterine rent repair. Four women had uterine perforation with associated bowel injury. Bowel repair was done in 1 case, and a colostomy was required in 3 cases. Emergency laparotomy was performed in these 5 cases. Conclusion: Unsafe abortions are one of the leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity in a developing country like India. This is mainly attributed to socio-economic constraints, poor awareness of contraception, and cultural beliefs against sterilization forcing the pregnant women to indulge in unsafe abortion practices. Creating contraception awareness in reproductive age group, strict laws against unsafe abortion practices are to be implemented to reduce the maternal morbidity and mortality due to unsafe abortions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scholars International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scholars International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36348/sijog.2022.v05i11.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholars International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/sijog.2022.v05i11.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:各年龄组妇女因意外怀孕和社会经济限制而进行的不安全堕胎对她们的生殖健康和精神健康产生有害影响。因此,审查和修改安全堕胎做法至关重要,因为非处方MTP试剂盒和由不熟练的专业人员进行的D&C泛滥,导致孕产妇死亡率和发病率。本研究提供了对不安全堕胎后果的估计。方法:世卫组织[1]将不安全堕胎定义为由缺乏必要技能的人或在缺乏最低医疗标准的环境中终止妊娠,或两者兼而有之。本研究是一个横断面描述性的分析结果在三级保健中心,GGH Kadapa不安全堕胎。该研究数据包括2019年1月至2020年6月期间产科急诊收治并接受不安全堕胎治疗的所有妇女。所选人口的年龄组在15-45岁之间。样本包括342例近期人工流产病例。这项研究的主要结果是强调不安全堕胎的负担、原因、环境和发病率。结果:2019年1月至2020年6月,分娩总数为13787例,同期人工流产总数为342例。其中211例(61.7%)为不安全流产。其中53例(25.11%)出现休克。89名妇女(42.1%)需要输血。8例(3.79%)发生DIC。一名妇女有子宫破裂,并接受子宫租金修复。4名妇女有子宫穿孔并伴有肠道损伤。1例行肠修复术,3例行结肠造口术。5例均行急诊剖腹手术。结论:不安全堕胎是印度等发展中国家产妇死亡和发病的主要原因之一。这主要是由于社会经济限制、避孕意识差以及反对绝育的文化信仰迫使孕妇沉迷于不安全的堕胎做法。在育龄群体中建立避孕意识,执行禁止不安全堕胎做法的严格法律,以减少不安全堕胎造成的产妇发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Cross-Sectional Survey on Prevalence, Interventions, and Outcomes of Unsafe Abortions in GGH, Kadapa
Objective: Unsafe abortions among the various age groups of women due to unintended pregnancy and socio- economic constraints have a deleterious effect on their reproductive and mental health. Hence, review and modification of safe abortion practices are crucial, owing to the rampant availability of over-the-counter MTP kits and D&C by unskilled professionals resulting in Maternal Mortality and Morbidity. This study provides an estimate of the outcomes of unsafe abortions. Methods: WHO [1] defines unsafe abortion as the termination of a pregnancy by people lacking the necessary skills, or in an environment lacking minimal medical standards, or both. The present study is a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of outcomes of unsafe abortions at a tertiary care center, GGH Kadapa. The study data includes all the women admitted to the emergency obstetric unit and treated for unsafe abortions between January 2019 to June 2020. Age group of the selected population is between 15-45. The sample included 342 cases of recent induced abortions. The primary outcome of the study is to emphasise the burden, causes, setting and the morbidity of unsafe abortions. Results: Total number of deliveries that occurred between Jan 2019 to June 2020 is 13787 and the total number of induced abortions during this period was 342. Out of which, 211(61.7%) were unsafe abortions. Among them, 53 women (25.11%) presented with shock. 89 women (42.1%) needed blood transfusions. 8 (3.79%) women went into DIC. One woman had a uterine rupture, and underwent uterine rent repair. Four women had uterine perforation with associated bowel injury. Bowel repair was done in 1 case, and a colostomy was required in 3 cases. Emergency laparotomy was performed in these 5 cases. Conclusion: Unsafe abortions are one of the leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity in a developing country like India. This is mainly attributed to socio-economic constraints, poor awareness of contraception, and cultural beliefs against sterilization forcing the pregnant women to indulge in unsafe abortion practices. Creating contraception awareness in reproductive age group, strict laws against unsafe abortion practices are to be implemented to reduce the maternal morbidity and mortality due to unsafe abortions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信