在20世纪80年代和90年代初，考古学是什么

CaieteARA. Arhitectură. Restaurare. Arheologie Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.47950/caieteara.2014.5.08

G. Niculescu

{"title":"在20世纪80年代和90年代初，考古学是什么","authors":"G. Niculescu","doi":"10.47950/caieteara.2014.5.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An investigation on the workings of archaeology in Romania a few decades ago shows features of a culture historical archaeology, with some particular traits, in part generated by the political regime of that time, which structure around defending accumulated tacit knowledge and the autonomy of the discipline. Th e reduced capacity of producing new thinking in the discipline is preserved after 1989, in changed social and political circumstances","PeriodicalId":445871,"journal":{"name":"CaieteARA. Arhitectură. Restaurare. Arheologie","volume":"6 1-2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What was archaeology during the 1980s and early 1990s\",\"authors\":\"G. Niculescu\",\"doi\":\"10.47950/caieteara.2014.5.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An investigation on the workings of archaeology in Romania a few decades ago shows features of a culture historical archaeology, with some particular traits, in part generated by the political regime of that time, which structure around defending accumulated tacit knowledge and the autonomy of the discipline. Th e reduced capacity of producing new thinking in the discipline is preserved after 1989, in changed social and political circumstances\",\"PeriodicalId\":445871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CaieteARA. Arhitectură. Restaurare. Arheologie\",\"volume\":\"6 1-2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CaieteARA. Arhitectură. Restaurare. Arheologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47950/caieteara.2014.5.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CaieteARA. Arhitectură. Restaurare. Arheologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47950/caieteara.2014.5.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年前对罗马尼亚考古工作的调查显示了文化历史考古学的特征，具有一些特殊的特征，部分是由当时的政治制度产生的，其结构围绕着保护积累的隐性知识和学科的自主性。1989年以后，在社会和政治环境发生变化的情况下，这一学科产生新思维的能力有所下降

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

What was archaeology during the 1980s and early 1990s

An investigation on the workings of archaeology in Romania a few decades ago shows features of a culture historical archaeology, with some particular traits, in part generated by the political regime of that time, which structure around defending accumulated tacit knowledge and the autonomy of the discipline. Th e reduced capacity of producing new thinking in the discipline is preserved after 1989, in changed social and political circumstances

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

CaieteARA. Arhitectură. Restaurare. Arheologie

自引率

0.00%

发文量