输电线路表面粗糙度的因果分析

Xinglin Sun, Yuandong Guo, Yin Sun, K. Song, Lingyun Ye, X. Ye, J. Drewniak, J. Fan
{"title":"输电线路表面粗糙度的因果分析","authors":"Xinglin Sun, Yuandong Guo, Yin Sun, K. Song, Lingyun Ye, X. Ye, J. Drewniak, J. Fan","doi":"10.1109/ISEMC.2019.8825246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surface roughness of the conductor in transmission lines will introduce extra losses. The recently proposed Huray model is quite accurate for modeling these additional losses by changing R terms in RLGC models. However, only focusing on the loss modeling of the transmission line may lead to causality issues in time domain simulations. In this paper, the causality requirements of the RLGC models are theoretically analyzed firstly. Then, two solutions of the causality problems in Huray model-based transmission line with rough conductors modeling were proposed and compared. One of them is based on the numerical Hilbert transform, and the other one is analytically based on a complex-valued roughness factor. The causalities of those two solutions are validated by a time domain pulse through a transmission line. The results comparisons of the received pulse responses after the transfer functions show that both methods can improve the causality of the wave propagation term significantly, whereas the analytical solution has better performances and the numerical method has some limitations.","PeriodicalId":137753,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Signal & Power Integrity (EMC+SIPI)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causality Analyzing for Transmission Line with Surface Roughness\",\"authors\":\"Xinglin Sun, Yuandong Guo, Yin Sun, K. Song, Lingyun Ye, X. Ye, J. Drewniak, J. Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISEMC.2019.8825246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Surface roughness of the conductor in transmission lines will introduce extra losses. The recently proposed Huray model is quite accurate for modeling these additional losses by changing R terms in RLGC models. However, only focusing on the loss modeling of the transmission line may lead to causality issues in time domain simulations. In this paper, the causality requirements of the RLGC models are theoretically analyzed firstly. Then, two solutions of the causality problems in Huray model-based transmission line with rough conductors modeling were proposed and compared. One of them is based on the numerical Hilbert transform, and the other one is analytically based on a complex-valued roughness factor. The causalities of those two solutions are validated by a time domain pulse through a transmission line. The results comparisons of the received pulse responses after the transfer functions show that both methods can improve the causality of the wave propagation term significantly, whereas the analytical solution has better performances and the numerical method has some limitations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Signal & Power Integrity (EMC+SIPI)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Signal & Power Integrity (EMC+SIPI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2019.8825246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Signal & Power Integrity (EMC+SIPI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2019.8825246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

输电线路中导体的表面粗糙度会带来额外的损耗。最近提出的Huray模型非常准确地通过改变RLGC模型中的R项来模拟这些额外的损失。然而,在时域仿真中,只关注传输线的损耗建模可能会导致因果关系问题。本文首先从理论上分析了RLGC模型的因果关系要求。在此基础上,对基于Huray模型的粗导线输电线路因果关系问题提出了两种解决方案,并进行了比较。其中一种是基于数值希尔伯特变换,另一种是基于复值粗糙度因子的解析。通过传输线的时域脉冲验证了这两种解的因果关系。通过对传递函数后接收脉冲响应的比较结果表明,两种方法都能显著改善波传播项的因果性,但解析解具有更好的性能,数值方法存在一定的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causality Analyzing for Transmission Line with Surface Roughness
Surface roughness of the conductor in transmission lines will introduce extra losses. The recently proposed Huray model is quite accurate for modeling these additional losses by changing R terms in RLGC models. However, only focusing on the loss modeling of the transmission line may lead to causality issues in time domain simulations. In this paper, the causality requirements of the RLGC models are theoretically analyzed firstly. Then, two solutions of the causality problems in Huray model-based transmission line with rough conductors modeling were proposed and compared. One of them is based on the numerical Hilbert transform, and the other one is analytically based on a complex-valued roughness factor. The causalities of those two solutions are validated by a time domain pulse through a transmission line. The results comparisons of the received pulse responses after the transfer functions show that both methods can improve the causality of the wave propagation term significantly, whereas the analytical solution has better performances and the numerical method has some limitations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信