中小城市居民未来居住概率差异及住房使用权选择和居住年限对居民未来居住概率的影响研究——以庆尚南道为例

Joon-Hyok Jo
{"title":"中小城市居民未来居住概率差异及住房使用权选择和居住年限对居民未来居住概率的影响研究——以庆尚南道为例","authors":"Joon-Hyok Jo","doi":"10.21447/jusre.2022.13.4.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to compare between cities‘ the possibility of 'continuing to live in the city where you currently live', and to analyze the extent to which differences in living conditions affect the possibility. An empirical analysis was conducted using data from 18 cities and counties in Gyeongsangnam-do and 15,000 households. A binary logit model was used. Among the 18 cities and counties in Gyeongsangnam-do, the cities and counties that had the greater possibility of continuing residence than Changwon-si were Miryang, Yangsan, Uiryeong, Changnyeong, Goseong, Hadong, Hamyang, Geochang, and Namhae. On the other hand, the smaller cities and counties were Geoje, Hapcheon, and Gimhae. Compared with those whose tenure type is their own house, the probability of continuous residence for those living in the rented house is smaller. The longer the period of residence in Gyeongsangnam-do and Gyeongsangnam-do cities and counties, the more likely they are to continue living.","PeriodicalId":253974,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Association of Urban Policies","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study on the difference in the future residence probability of residents, and the effect of housing tenure choice and period of residence on them in small and medium-sized cities: Focused on Gyeongsangnam-do\",\"authors\":\"Joon-Hyok Jo\",\"doi\":\"10.21447/jusre.2022.13.4.73\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to compare between cities‘ the possibility of 'continuing to live in the city where you currently live', and to analyze the extent to which differences in living conditions affect the possibility. An empirical analysis was conducted using data from 18 cities and counties in Gyeongsangnam-do and 15,000 households. A binary logit model was used. Among the 18 cities and counties in Gyeongsangnam-do, the cities and counties that had the greater possibility of continuing residence than Changwon-si were Miryang, Yangsan, Uiryeong, Changnyeong, Goseong, Hadong, Hamyang, Geochang, and Namhae. On the other hand, the smaller cities and counties were Geoje, Hapcheon, and Gimhae. Compared with those whose tenure type is their own house, the probability of continuous residence for those living in the rented house is smaller. The longer the period of residence in Gyeongsangnam-do and Gyeongsangnam-do cities and counties, the more likely they are to continue living.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Association of Urban Policies\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Association of Urban Policies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21447/jusre.2022.13.4.73\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Association of Urban Policies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21447/jusre.2022.13.4.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较不同城市“继续生活在你目前居住的城市”的可能性,并分析生活条件的差异在多大程度上影响了这种可能性。以庆尚南道18个市郡和1.5万户家庭为对象,进行了实证分析。采用二元logit模型。在庆尚南道的18个市郡中,比昌原市更有可能继续居住的市郡依次是密阳、梁山、宜宁、昌宁、高城、河东、咸阳、居昌、南海。相反,规模较小的市郡是巨济、陕川、金海。与自有住房的租住类型相比,租住类型的连续居住概率较小。在庆尚南道和庆尚南道市郡居住的时间越长,继续居住的可能性越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A study on the difference in the future residence probability of residents, and the effect of housing tenure choice and period of residence on them in small and medium-sized cities: Focused on Gyeongsangnam-do
The purpose of this study is to compare between cities‘ the possibility of 'continuing to live in the city where you currently live', and to analyze the extent to which differences in living conditions affect the possibility. An empirical analysis was conducted using data from 18 cities and counties in Gyeongsangnam-do and 15,000 households. A binary logit model was used. Among the 18 cities and counties in Gyeongsangnam-do, the cities and counties that had the greater possibility of continuing residence than Changwon-si were Miryang, Yangsan, Uiryeong, Changnyeong, Goseong, Hadong, Hamyang, Geochang, and Namhae. On the other hand, the smaller cities and counties were Geoje, Hapcheon, and Gimhae. Compared with those whose tenure type is their own house, the probability of continuous residence for those living in the rented house is smaller. The longer the period of residence in Gyeongsangnam-do and Gyeongsangnam-do cities and counties, the more likely they are to continue living.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信