VNA S11不确定度测量——三种技术的比较

39th ARFTG Conference Digest Pub Date : 1992-06-05 DOI:10.1109/ARFTG.1992.326976

B. Oldfield

{"title":"VNA S11不确定度测量——三种技术的比较","authors":"B. Oldfield","doi":"10.1109/ARFTG.1992.326976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vector Network Analyzers derive a large percentage of their accuracy from calibration. Assessing the uncertainty of that calibration can be difficult and time consuming. Not assessing the uncertainty can lead to inaccurate measurements. This paper compares the results of three VNA uncertainty assessment techniques. The techniques are Verification, Assurance and Time Domain.","PeriodicalId":220587,"journal":{"name":"39th ARFTG Conference Digest","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VNA S11 Uncertainty Measurement a Comparison of Three Techniques\",\"authors\":\"B. Oldfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARFTG.1992.326976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vector Network Analyzers derive a large percentage of their accuracy from calibration. Assessing the uncertainty of that calibration can be difficult and time consuming. Not assessing the uncertainty can lead to inaccurate measurements. This paper compares the results of three VNA uncertainty assessment techniques. The techniques are Verification, Assurance and Time Domain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"39th ARFTG Conference Digest\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"39th ARFTG Conference Digest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARFTG.1992.326976\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"39th ARFTG Conference Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARFTG.1992.326976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 16

摘要

矢量网络分析仪的准确度很大一部分来自校准。评估该校准的不确定性可能是困难和耗时的。不评估不确定度会导致测量不准确。本文比较了三种VNA不确定度评估技术的结果。技术包括验证、保证和时域。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

VNA S11 Uncertainty Measurement a Comparison of Three Techniques

Vector Network Analyzers derive a large percentage of their accuracy from calibration. Assessing the uncertainty of that calibration can be difficult and time consuming. Not assessing the uncertainty can lead to inaccurate measurements. This paper compares the results of three VNA uncertainty assessment techniques. The techniques are Verification, Assurance and Time Domain.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

39th ARFTG Conference Digest

自引率

0.00%

发文量