Nijolė Vasiljevienė
{"title":"Akademinis integralumas: nuo abstraktaus kalbėjimo apie akademinį sąžiningumą – prie jo vadybos","authors":"Nijolė Vasiljevienė","doi":"10.13165/SMS-14-6-3-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the analysis of academic integrity concept and its wider application possibilities in Lithuanian universities. It provides the analysis of ethics institutionalization problems in the field and relates the ways of their resolution through academic integrity management. The aim of the paper is to reveal that integrity in organization activity has definite meanings and to prove that integrity is valid when transferring from abstract talking to real building of academic integrity is taking place. The author also explains that the realization of academic integrity is stipulated by proper organizational processes, ethics infrastructure and presupposed by effective value management systems, which enforce operationalization of outstanding aims of higher education. The author traces existing in Lithuanian higher school structures social cultural attitudes that determine mental and institutional barriers for integrity concept establishing. She argues that instrumental application of academic integrity diminishes the gap between declared values and facts, as well as between established ethics norms and their realization in institutional practice. Thus, integrity management helps to eliminate academic misconduct and still existent multiple facts of academic dishonesty. If such situation remains, the value of higher education decreases. That is why the formation of academic integrity assures the way to improve the situation. The paper generally raises the seminal problem of academic ethics institutionalization in Lithuanian higher schools and offers building the system, in which the society could trust in and rely on higher school diploma, university credentials and competencies of university graduates as prospective professionals. The paper offers to build academic integrity in Lithuanian higher school institutions by transferring the focus from individual integrity to the organizational one, while purposively forming corporative integrity through implementation of definite organisational processes and procedures. Only complex formation of integrity culture can surmount academic dishonesty, so it requires systems approach to the struggle against academic fouls, reconstruction of appropriate organization processes, creation of required integrity promotion procedures as well as its consistent implementation by using all managerial tools. The attempts to implement ethics codes “from above”, in many cases without substantiation of new ethics regulation necessity by discourse, and to avoid a reflection of academic integrity problems were unlucky. The failures are also stipulated by maintaining ethics norms purely through prescriptive imperatives, along with widespread ignorance of value management on the institutional level and without due awareness of definite ethics tools. Namely, these tools enable changes of attitudes and behaviours, promote academic integrity and empower changes on institutional level, help to cultivate integrity culture in academic life practices. In recent decade, ethical regulation of academic community in Lithuania has been improving purely through creation of normative content of documents, however, its evaluation and comparing against real possibilities and specific environment was lacking, while making norms more exact and correcting mistakes and inaccuracies. The author stresses peculiarities of modern organisational ethics paradigm and offers to apply them in a wider context, while constructing organisational integrity in universities, i.e. while forming practically ethics values and purposively creating academic integrity with the help of interdisciplinary scientific knowledge. It is possible if one uses his analytical and prognostic abilities not only copying the examples of good practices or blindly moving along the way of “trial-and-error methods”.","PeriodicalId":256611,"journal":{"name":"Societal Studies","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13165/SMS-14-6-3-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文分析了学术诚信理念及其在立陶宛大学广泛应用的可能性。对学术诚信管理中存在的伦理制度化问题进行了分析,并提出了解决这些问题的途径。本文旨在揭示诚信在组织活动中具有明确的意义,并证明诚信在学术诚信建设从抽象的空谈转向现实的过程中是有效的。学术诚信的实现需要适当的组织程序和道德基础,并以有效的价值管理体系为前提,从而确保高等教育卓越目标的可操作性。作者追溯了立陶宛高等学校结构中存在的社会文化态度,这些态度决定了诚信观念确立的心理和制度障碍。她认为,学术诚信的工具性应用缩小了宣称的价值观与事实之间的差距,也缩小了既定的道德规范与其在制度实践中的实现之间的差距。因此,诚信管理有助于消除学术不端行为和仍然存在的多种学术不诚信事实。如果这种情况持续下去,高等教育的价值就会下降。这就是为什么学术诚信的形成保证了改善这种状况的途径。本文提出了立陶宛高等学校学术道德制度化的重大问题,并提出了建立社会信任和依赖高等学校文凭、大学证书和大学毕业生作为未来专业人员的能力的制度。本文提出立陶宛高校学术诚信建设应从注重个人诚信转向注重组织诚信,同时通过实施明确的组织流程和程序,有目的地形成企业诚信。只有形成复杂的诚信文化才能克服学术不诚信,因此需要用系统的方法来与学术违规作斗争,重建适当的组织流程,创造必要的诚信促进程序,并利用所有管理工具一致地实施。试图“自上而下”实施道德规范,在很多情况下没有通过话语来证实新的道德规范的必要性,并避免反映学术诚信问题是不幸的。失败的原因还包括,纯粹通过规定性的命令来维持道德规范,以及在制度层面上对价值管理的普遍无知,以及对明确的道德工具缺乏应有的认识。也就是说,这些工具能够改变态度和行为,促进学术诚信,并赋予机构层面的变革权力,有助于在学术生活实践中培养诚信文化。近十年来,立陶宛学术界的伦理规范一直在单纯地通过文件规范性内容的创造来完善,但缺乏对现实可能性和具体环境的评价和比较,同时使规范更加精确,纠正错误和不准确之处。作者强调了现代组织伦理范式的特殊性,并提出在构建大学组织诚信的过程中,即在实践中形成伦理价值观,在跨学科科学知识的帮助下有目的地创造学术诚信的过程中,将其应用于更广泛的背景下。如果一个人运用他的分析和预测能力,不只是照搬好的实践范例,或者盲目地沿着“试错法”的道路前进,这是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Akademinis integralumas: nuo abstraktaus kalbėjimo apie akademinį sąžiningumą – prie jo vadybos
The paper deals with the analysis of academic integrity concept and its wider application possibilities in Lithuanian universities. It provides the analysis of ethics institutionalization problems in the field and relates the ways of their resolution through academic integrity management. The aim of the paper is to reveal that integrity in organization activity has definite meanings and to prove that integrity is valid when transferring from abstract talking to real building of academic integrity is taking place. The author also explains that the realization of academic integrity is stipulated by proper organizational processes, ethics infrastructure and presupposed by effective value management systems, which enforce operationalization of outstanding aims of higher education. The author traces existing in Lithuanian higher school structures social cultural attitudes that determine mental and institutional barriers for integrity concept establishing. She argues that instrumental application of academic integrity diminishes the gap between declared values and facts, as well as between established ethics norms and their realization in institutional practice. Thus, integrity management helps to eliminate academic misconduct and still existent multiple facts of academic dishonesty. If such situation remains, the value of higher education decreases. That is why the formation of academic integrity assures the way to improve the situation. The paper generally raises the seminal problem of academic ethics institutionalization in Lithuanian higher schools and offers building the system, in which the society could trust in and rely on higher school diploma, university credentials and competencies of university graduates as prospective professionals. The paper offers to build academic integrity in Lithuanian higher school institutions by transferring the focus from individual integrity to the organizational one, while purposively forming corporative integrity through implementation of definite organisational processes and procedures. Only complex formation of integrity culture can surmount academic dishonesty, so it requires systems approach to the struggle against academic fouls, reconstruction of appropriate organization processes, creation of required integrity promotion procedures as well as its consistent implementation by using all managerial tools. The attempts to implement ethics codes “from above”, in many cases without substantiation of new ethics regulation necessity by discourse, and to avoid a reflection of academic integrity problems were unlucky. The failures are also stipulated by maintaining ethics norms purely through prescriptive imperatives, along with widespread ignorance of value management on the institutional level and without due awareness of definite ethics tools. Namely, these tools enable changes of attitudes and behaviours, promote academic integrity and empower changes on institutional level, help to cultivate integrity culture in academic life practices. In recent decade, ethical regulation of academic community in Lithuania has been improving purely through creation of normative content of documents, however, its evaluation and comparing against real possibilities and specific environment was lacking, while making norms more exact and correcting mistakes and inaccuracies. The author stresses peculiarities of modern organisational ethics paradigm and offers to apply them in a wider context, while constructing organisational integrity in universities, i.e. while forming practically ethics values and purposively creating academic integrity with the help of interdisciplinary scientific knowledge. It is possible if one uses his analytical and prognostic abilities not only copying the examples of good practices or blindly moving along the way of “trial-and-error methods”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信