了解RTCWeb的Google拥塞控制的动态行为

L. D. Cicco, G. Carlucci, S. Mascolo
{"title":"了解RTCWeb的Google拥塞控制的动态行为","authors":"L. D. Cicco, G. Carlucci, S. Mascolo","doi":"10.1109/PV.2013.6691458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Real-time communication over the Internet is of ever increasing importance due the diffusion of portable devices, such as smart phones or tablets, with enough processing capacity to support video conferencing applications. The RTCWeb working group has been established with the goal of standardizing a set of protocols for inter-operable real-time communication among Web browsers. In this paper we focus on the Google Congestion Control (GCC), recently proposed in such WG, which is based on a loss-based algorithm run at the sender and a delay-based algorithm executed at the receiver. In a recent work we have shown that a TCP flow can starve a GCC flow. In this work we show that this issue is due to a threshold mechanism employed by the delay-based controller. By carrying out an extensive experimental evaluation in a controlled testbed, we have found that, when the threshold is small, the delay-based algorithm prevails over the loss-based algorithm, which contains queuing delays and losses. However, a small threshold may lead to starvation of the GCC flow when sharing the bottleneck with a loss-based TCP flow.","PeriodicalId":289244,"journal":{"name":"2013 20th International Packet Video Workshop","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Dynamic Behaviour of the Google Congestion Control for RTCWeb\",\"authors\":\"L. D. Cicco, G. Carlucci, S. Mascolo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PV.2013.6691458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Real-time communication over the Internet is of ever increasing importance due the diffusion of portable devices, such as smart phones or tablets, with enough processing capacity to support video conferencing applications. The RTCWeb working group has been established with the goal of standardizing a set of protocols for inter-operable real-time communication among Web browsers. In this paper we focus on the Google Congestion Control (GCC), recently proposed in such WG, which is based on a loss-based algorithm run at the sender and a delay-based algorithm executed at the receiver. In a recent work we have shown that a TCP flow can starve a GCC flow. In this work we show that this issue is due to a threshold mechanism employed by the delay-based controller. By carrying out an extensive experimental evaluation in a controlled testbed, we have found that, when the threshold is small, the delay-based algorithm prevails over the loss-based algorithm, which contains queuing delays and losses. However, a small threshold may lead to starvation of the GCC flow when sharing the bottleneck with a loss-based TCP flow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":289244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 20th International Packet Video Workshop\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 20th International Packet Video Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PV.2013.6691458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 20th International Packet Video Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PV.2013.6691458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

由于智能手机或平板电脑等便携式设备的普及,具有足够的处理能力来支持视频会议应用,因此互联网上的实时通信变得越来越重要。RTCWeb工作组的目标是标准化一组协议,以便在Web浏览器之间进行可互操作的实时通信。在本文中,我们重点讨论了最近在这种工作组中提出的谷歌拥塞控制(GCC),它基于在发送端运行的基于损失的算法和在接收端执行的基于延迟的算法。在最近的一项工作中,我们展示了TCP流可以饿死GCC流。在这项工作中,我们表明这个问题是由于基于延迟的控制器采用的阈值机制。通过在受控测试台上进行广泛的实验评估,我们发现,当阈值较小时,基于延迟的算法优于基于损失的算法,后者包含排队延迟和损失。但是,当与基于损耗的TCP流共享瓶颈时,较小的阈值可能导致GCC流耗尽。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the Dynamic Behaviour of the Google Congestion Control for RTCWeb
Real-time communication over the Internet is of ever increasing importance due the diffusion of portable devices, such as smart phones or tablets, with enough processing capacity to support video conferencing applications. The RTCWeb working group has been established with the goal of standardizing a set of protocols for inter-operable real-time communication among Web browsers. In this paper we focus on the Google Congestion Control (GCC), recently proposed in such WG, which is based on a loss-based algorithm run at the sender and a delay-based algorithm executed at the receiver. In a recent work we have shown that a TCP flow can starve a GCC flow. In this work we show that this issue is due to a threshold mechanism employed by the delay-based controller. By carrying out an extensive experimental evaluation in a controlled testbed, we have found that, when the threshold is small, the delay-based algorithm prevails over the loss-based algorithm, which contains queuing delays and losses. However, a small threshold may lead to starvation of the GCC flow when sharing the bottleneck with a loss-based TCP flow.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信