A. Kar, Bhagyashree Radhakrishnan, Trushna Girase, Dhammasagar Ujagare, A. Patil
{"title":"出生缺陷和发育障碍的社区筛查和早期干预:来自印度RBSK项目的经验教训","authors":"A. Kar, Bhagyashree Radhakrishnan, Trushna Girase, Dhammasagar Ujagare, A. Patil","doi":"10.5463/dcid.v31i1.890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK) is an ongoing screening and early intervention programme for children in India. Children with birth defects and developmental disabilities from rural and urban communities are referred for treatment and therapies to early intervention centres located in urban areas. This study primarily aimed at determining caregiver uptake and compliance to referral advice of the RBSK, with the larger goal of determining the utility of the community-based screening and district-based intervention service model for caregivers of children with disabilities. Method: Three administrative blocks and one municipal corporation area of Pune district, in Maharashtra, were randomly selected. The sample consisted of 115 caregivers of children with disabilities. They were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire that investigated uptake of referral advice, treatment outcome, current health status of the child and reasons for noncompliance, three to nine months after the first referral by the RBSK team. Results: Sixty-four caregivers were aware of their child’s disability, but most children remained untreated. After screening and referral by the RBSK team, compliance was high for treatable conditions like congenital heart defects. Treatment was discontinued for 83% (24 out of 29) of children with developmental disabilities. Reasons for discontinuation included lengthy waiting time, distance to facility, difficulty in transporting the child, loss of wages, and denial of the child’s disability. Conclusion and Implications: The results indicated that the RBSK programme provides treatment opportunities for children who are left undiagnosed and untreated in the community. Providing rehabilitation services at district centres is a barrier for service uptake. Alternative models such as early childhood development screening and integrating rehabilitation services at the primary healthcare level may be more feasible to provide services for children with disabilities in India.","PeriodicalId":179630,"journal":{"name":"Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community-Based Screening and Early Intervention for Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities: Lessons from the RBSK Programme in India\",\"authors\":\"A. Kar, Bhagyashree Radhakrishnan, Trushna Girase, Dhammasagar Ujagare, A. Patil\",\"doi\":\"10.5463/dcid.v31i1.890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK) is an ongoing screening and early intervention programme for children in India. Children with birth defects and developmental disabilities from rural and urban communities are referred for treatment and therapies to early intervention centres located in urban areas. This study primarily aimed at determining caregiver uptake and compliance to referral advice of the RBSK, with the larger goal of determining the utility of the community-based screening and district-based intervention service model for caregivers of children with disabilities. Method: Three administrative blocks and one municipal corporation area of Pune district, in Maharashtra, were randomly selected. The sample consisted of 115 caregivers of children with disabilities. They were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire that investigated uptake of referral advice, treatment outcome, current health status of the child and reasons for noncompliance, three to nine months after the first referral by the RBSK team. Results: Sixty-four caregivers were aware of their child’s disability, but most children remained untreated. After screening and referral by the RBSK team, compliance was high for treatable conditions like congenital heart defects. Treatment was discontinued for 83% (24 out of 29) of children with developmental disabilities. Reasons for discontinuation included lengthy waiting time, distance to facility, difficulty in transporting the child, loss of wages, and denial of the child’s disability. Conclusion and Implications: The results indicated that the RBSK programme provides treatment opportunities for children who are left undiagnosed and untreated in the community. Providing rehabilitation services at district centres is a barrier for service uptake. Alternative models such as early childhood development screening and integrating rehabilitation services at the primary healthcare level may be more feasible to provide services for children with disabilities in India.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5463/dcid.v31i1.890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5463/dcid.v31i1.890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
摘要
目的:Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK)是印度儿童的一项持续筛查和早期干预计划。农村和城市社区有先天缺陷和发育障碍的儿童被转介到城市地区的早期干预中心接受治疗和治疗。本研究的主要目的是确定照顾者对RBSK转诊建议的接受和依从性,更大的目标是确定基于社区的筛查和基于地区的干预服务模式对残疾儿童照顾者的效用。方法:随机选取马哈拉施特拉邦浦那地区的3个行政街区和1个市政公司区。样本包括115名残疾儿童的照顾者。在RBSK小组第一次转诊后3至9个月,使用半结构化问卷对他们进行了访谈,调查了转诊建议的接受情况、治疗结果、儿童目前的健康状况和不遵守的原因。结果:64名照顾者意识到他们孩子的残疾,但大多数孩子没有得到治疗。经过RBSK团队的筛选和转诊,对于先天性心脏缺陷等可治疗的疾病,依从性很高。83%(29人中24人)的发育性残疾儿童停止了治疗。中止的原因包括等待时间长、到设施的距离远、运送儿童困难、损失工资和否认儿童的残疾。结论和意义:结果表明,RBSK项目为社区中未确诊和未治疗的儿童提供了治疗机会。在地区中心提供康复服务是接受服务的一个障碍。在印度,为残疾儿童提供服务的其他模式,如儿童早期发育筛查和初级保健一级的综合康复服务,可能更为可行。
Community-Based Screening and Early Intervention for Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities: Lessons from the RBSK Programme in India
Purpose: The Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK) is an ongoing screening and early intervention programme for children in India. Children with birth defects and developmental disabilities from rural and urban communities are referred for treatment and therapies to early intervention centres located in urban areas. This study primarily aimed at determining caregiver uptake and compliance to referral advice of the RBSK, with the larger goal of determining the utility of the community-based screening and district-based intervention service model for caregivers of children with disabilities. Method: Three administrative blocks and one municipal corporation area of Pune district, in Maharashtra, were randomly selected. The sample consisted of 115 caregivers of children with disabilities. They were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire that investigated uptake of referral advice, treatment outcome, current health status of the child and reasons for noncompliance, three to nine months after the first referral by the RBSK team. Results: Sixty-four caregivers were aware of their child’s disability, but most children remained untreated. After screening and referral by the RBSK team, compliance was high for treatable conditions like congenital heart defects. Treatment was discontinued for 83% (24 out of 29) of children with developmental disabilities. Reasons for discontinuation included lengthy waiting time, distance to facility, difficulty in transporting the child, loss of wages, and denial of the child’s disability. Conclusion and Implications: The results indicated that the RBSK programme provides treatment opportunities for children who are left undiagnosed and untreated in the community. Providing rehabilitation services at district centres is a barrier for service uptake. Alternative models such as early childhood development screening and integrating rehabilitation services at the primary healthcare level may be more feasible to provide services for children with disabilities in India.