燃气轮机压缩机空气泄漏预测的深度学习算法标杆测试

Diego I. Nogueras-Rivera, Harry Bonilla-Alvarado, Julio A. Reyes-Munoz, Alex D. Santiago-Vargas, Luis M. Traverso-Aviles, Diego A. Aponte-Roa
{"title":"燃气轮机压缩机空气泄漏预测的深度学习算法标杆测试","authors":"Diego I. Nogueras-Rivera, Harry Bonilla-Alvarado, Julio A. Reyes-Munoz, Alex D. Santiago-Vargas, Luis M. Traverso-Aviles, Diego A. Aponte-Roa","doi":"10.1109/td43745.2022.9816854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today's electrical grid, power plants are required to continuously monitor performance by combining sensors with advanced data analytics to provide reliable and efficient energy. This study compares the performance of various state-of-the-art deep learning (DL) algorithms for detecting anomalies on time-series data collected from multiple experiments conducted at the U.S. Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) Hybrid Performance (Hyper) Facility; equipped with a 120-kW modified gas turbine system designed for hybrid configuration. The experiments consisted of a series of electrical load changes with an emulated compressor leak, which was reproduced by modulating the compressor bleed air valve. Nine different DL architectures were evaluated for a binary classification problem. The performance of the algorithms was compared by observing the average Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) metric score and stability with the results over a series of tests. Each algorithm was trained to predict the label of the first future time-step and later the tenth time-step to understand how the algorithm's predictive performance was affected when predicting time steps further from the present time-step. Results suggest that, for predicting the first future time-step, the most feasible algorithms were the hybrid GRULSTM and parallel CNN-LSTM, with average MCC scores of approximately 71% and 70% respectively. Further, the most stable algorithms, while maintaining acceptable performance, were the sequential CNN-LSTM and Bi-LSTM with 69% and 68% MCC scores, respectively. On the other hand, with the tenth future time-step case, results suggest that the best algorithm was the TCN-FF, with an average MCC score of 75%. An alternative algorithm to explore, for this case, would be the sequential CNNLSTM with an average MCC score of 66% and great stability.","PeriodicalId":241987,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (T&D)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking of Deep Learning Algorithms for Compressor Air Leak Prediction in a Gas Turbine\",\"authors\":\"Diego I. Nogueras-Rivera, Harry Bonilla-Alvarado, Julio A. Reyes-Munoz, Alex D. Santiago-Vargas, Luis M. Traverso-Aviles, Diego A. Aponte-Roa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/td43745.2022.9816854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In today's electrical grid, power plants are required to continuously monitor performance by combining sensors with advanced data analytics to provide reliable and efficient energy. This study compares the performance of various state-of-the-art deep learning (DL) algorithms for detecting anomalies on time-series data collected from multiple experiments conducted at the U.S. Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) Hybrid Performance (Hyper) Facility; equipped with a 120-kW modified gas turbine system designed for hybrid configuration. The experiments consisted of a series of electrical load changes with an emulated compressor leak, which was reproduced by modulating the compressor bleed air valve. Nine different DL architectures were evaluated for a binary classification problem. The performance of the algorithms was compared by observing the average Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) metric score and stability with the results over a series of tests. Each algorithm was trained to predict the label of the first future time-step and later the tenth time-step to understand how the algorithm's predictive performance was affected when predicting time steps further from the present time-step. Results suggest that, for predicting the first future time-step, the most feasible algorithms were the hybrid GRULSTM and parallel CNN-LSTM, with average MCC scores of approximately 71% and 70% respectively. Further, the most stable algorithms, while maintaining acceptable performance, were the sequential CNN-LSTM and Bi-LSTM with 69% and 68% MCC scores, respectively. On the other hand, with the tenth future time-step case, results suggest that the best algorithm was the TCN-FF, with an average MCC score of 75%. An alternative algorithm to explore, for this case, would be the sequential CNNLSTM with an average MCC score of 66% and great stability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":241987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (T&D)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (T&D)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/td43745.2022.9816854\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (T&D)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/td43745.2022.9816854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在今天的电网中,发电厂需要通过将传感器与先进的数据分析相结合来持续监控性能,以提供可靠和高效的能源。本研究比较了各种最先进的深度学习(DL)算法的性能,这些算法用于检测从美国能源部国家能源技术实验室(NETL)混合性能(Hyper)设施进行的多次实验中收集的时间序列数据的异常;配备为混合动力配置设计的120千瓦改进型燃气轮机系统。实验包括一系列的电负荷变化与模拟压缩机泄漏,这是通过调节压缩机的排气阀再现。对一个二元分类问题评估了九种不同的深度学习架构。通过观察马修斯相关系数(MCC)的平均度量分数和一系列测试结果的稳定性来比较算法的性能。每个算法都被训练来预测未来第一个时间步的标签,然后是第10个时间步的标签,以了解当预测距离当前时间步更远的时间步时,算法的预测性能是如何受到影响的。结果表明,对于预测未来第一个时间步长,最可行的算法是混合GRULSTM和并行CNN-LSTM,平均MCC得分分别约为71%和70%。此外,在保持可接受性能的同时,最稳定的算法是顺序CNN-LSTM和Bi-LSTM,分别具有69%和68%的MCC得分。另一方面,对于第10个未来时间步情况,结果表明最佳算法是TCN-FF,平均MCC得分为75%。对于这种情况,另一种可以探索的算法是顺序CNNLSTM,它的平均MCC得分为66%,并且具有很强的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benchmarking of Deep Learning Algorithms for Compressor Air Leak Prediction in a Gas Turbine
In today's electrical grid, power plants are required to continuously monitor performance by combining sensors with advanced data analytics to provide reliable and efficient energy. This study compares the performance of various state-of-the-art deep learning (DL) algorithms for detecting anomalies on time-series data collected from multiple experiments conducted at the U.S. Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) Hybrid Performance (Hyper) Facility; equipped with a 120-kW modified gas turbine system designed for hybrid configuration. The experiments consisted of a series of electrical load changes with an emulated compressor leak, which was reproduced by modulating the compressor bleed air valve. Nine different DL architectures were evaluated for a binary classification problem. The performance of the algorithms was compared by observing the average Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) metric score and stability with the results over a series of tests. Each algorithm was trained to predict the label of the first future time-step and later the tenth time-step to understand how the algorithm's predictive performance was affected when predicting time steps further from the present time-step. Results suggest that, for predicting the first future time-step, the most feasible algorithms were the hybrid GRULSTM and parallel CNN-LSTM, with average MCC scores of approximately 71% and 70% respectively. Further, the most stable algorithms, while maintaining acceptable performance, were the sequential CNN-LSTM and Bi-LSTM with 69% and 68% MCC scores, respectively. On the other hand, with the tenth future time-step case, results suggest that the best algorithm was the TCN-FF, with an average MCC score of 75%. An alternative algorithm to explore, for this case, would be the sequential CNNLSTM with an average MCC score of 66% and great stability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信