线束装配三种任务指导接口的比较

Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems Pub Date : 2016-05-07 DOI:10.1145/2851581.2892347

M. Rice, Hong Huei Tay, Jamie Ng, C. Lim, S. Selvaraj, Ellick Wu

{"title":"线束装配三种任务指导接口的比较","authors":"M. Rice, Hong Huei Tay, Jamie Ng, C. Lim, S. Selvaraj, Ellick Wu","doi":"10.1145/2851581.2892347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we describe a user study that compared the design of three visual interfaces (i.e. Text, AR and a 2D Schematic view) to support the wire harness assembly of electrical wires in modern aircraft. Displayed on a portable iPad, 18 participants were instructed to route three sets of wires on a commercial aerospace formboard. Through video analysis, the results identified significant differences in the mapping time, and number of visual references made in viewing information on the three interfaces. In particular, a lack of graphical information in the Text, and camera alignment issues in the AR conditions demonstrated noticeable limitations in interaction. We briefly discuss these findings.","PeriodicalId":285547,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Three Task Guidance Interfaces for Wire Harness Assembly\",\"authors\":\"M. Rice, Hong Huei Tay, Jamie Ng, C. Lim, S. Selvaraj, Ellick Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2851581.2892347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we describe a user study that compared the design of three visual interfaces (i.e. Text, AR and a 2D Schematic view) to support the wire harness assembly of electrical wires in modern aircraft. Displayed on a portable iPad, 18 participants were instructed to route three sets of wires on a commercial aerospace formboard. Through video analysis, the results identified significant differences in the mapping time, and number of visual references made in viewing information on the three interfaces. In particular, a lack of graphical information in the Text, and camera alignment issues in the AR conditions demonstrated noticeable limitations in interaction. We briefly discuss these findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

在本文中，我们描述了一项用户研究，该研究比较了三种可视化界面(即文本，AR和2D原理图视图)的设计，以支持现代飞机中电线的线束组装。在便携式iPad上，18名参与者被指示在商业航空航天模板上布线三组电线。通过视频分析，结果发现在三个界面上查看信息的映射时间和视觉参考次数存在显著差异。特别是，文本中缺乏图形信息，以及AR条件下的相机对齐问题显示了交互的明显限制。我们简要讨论这些发现。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparing Three Task Guidance Interfaces for Wire Harness Assembly

In this paper, we describe a user study that compared the design of three visual interfaces (i.e. Text, AR and a 2D Schematic view) to support the wire harness assembly of electrical wires in modern aircraft. Displayed on a portable iPad, 18 participants were instructed to route three sets of wires on a commercial aerospace formboard. Through video analysis, the results identified significant differences in the mapping time, and number of visual references made in viewing information on the three interfaces. In particular, a lack of graphical information in the Text, and camera alignment issues in the AR conditions demonstrated noticeable limitations in interaction. We briefly discuss these findings.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

自引率

0.00%

发文量