360度视场扫描激光雷达与非重复扫描激光雷达:漫游者导航实验

Filippo Volpin, S. Chiodini, Simone Fortuna, A. Valmorbida, M. Pertile
{"title":"360度视场扫描激光雷达与非重复扫描激光雷达:漫游者导航实验","authors":"Filippo Volpin, S. Chiodini, Simone Fortuna, A. Valmorbida, M. Pertile","doi":"10.1109/MetroAeroSpace57412.2023.10189983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an experimental comparison of two types of LiDAR sensors for the navigation of rovers: a 360-deg FOV Scanning LiDAR, the Ouster OS1-32, and a non-repetitive scanning LiDAR, the Livox Horizon. The study aims to determine the performance differences between these two sensors in terms of accuracy, and reliability, which are crucial factors for rover navigation in complex environments. The data collected by the LiDAR were processed as follows: the trajectory was reconstructed using the LiDAR-SLAM algorithm FAST-LIO and the obstacle map was created using the VoxBlox library. The experiments were conducted in various scenarios, including terrain with obstacles and uneven surfaces, and the results were analyzed in terms of trajectory error.","PeriodicalId":153093,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 10th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"360-deg FOV Scanning LiDAR versus Non-Repetitive Scanning LiDAR: A Rover Navigation Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Volpin, S. Chiodini, Simone Fortuna, A. Valmorbida, M. Pertile\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MetroAeroSpace57412.2023.10189983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents an experimental comparison of two types of LiDAR sensors for the navigation of rovers: a 360-deg FOV Scanning LiDAR, the Ouster OS1-32, and a non-repetitive scanning LiDAR, the Livox Horizon. The study aims to determine the performance differences between these two sensors in terms of accuracy, and reliability, which are crucial factors for rover navigation in complex environments. The data collected by the LiDAR were processed as follows: the trajectory was reconstructed using the LiDAR-SLAM algorithm FAST-LIO and the obstacle map was created using the VoxBlox library. The experiments were conducted in various scenarios, including terrain with obstacles and uneven surfaces, and the results were analyzed in terms of trajectory error.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE 10th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE 10th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MetroAeroSpace57412.2023.10189983\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 10th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MetroAeroSpace57412.2023.10189983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了两种用于漫游车导航的激光雷达传感器的实验比较:360度视场扫描激光雷达,Ouster OS1-32,和非重复扫描激光雷达,Livox地平线。该研究旨在确定这两种传感器在精度和可靠性方面的性能差异,这是在复杂环境中漫游车导航的关键因素。对激光雷达采集的数据进行处理:利用激光雷达slam算法FAST-LIO重构轨迹,利用VoxBlox库创建障碍物图。实验在不同的场景下进行,包括有障碍物的地形和不平整的表面,并从轨迹误差的角度对实验结果进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
360-deg FOV Scanning LiDAR versus Non-Repetitive Scanning LiDAR: A Rover Navigation Experiment
This paper presents an experimental comparison of two types of LiDAR sensors for the navigation of rovers: a 360-deg FOV Scanning LiDAR, the Ouster OS1-32, and a non-repetitive scanning LiDAR, the Livox Horizon. The study aims to determine the performance differences between these two sensors in terms of accuracy, and reliability, which are crucial factors for rover navigation in complex environments. The data collected by the LiDAR were processed as follows: the trajectory was reconstructed using the LiDAR-SLAM algorithm FAST-LIO and the obstacle map was created using the VoxBlox library. The experiments were conducted in various scenarios, including terrain with obstacles and uneven surfaces, and the results were analyzed in terms of trajectory error.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信