比较ML、MUSIC、ROOT-MUSIC和空间平滑算法对2个用户的精度

M. Jalali, Mohamad Naser Moghaddasi, Alireza Habibzadeh
{"title":"比较ML、MUSIC、ROOT-MUSIC和空间平滑算法对2个用户的精度","authors":"M. Jalali, Mohamad Naser Moghaddasi, Alireza Habibzadeh","doi":"10.1109/MMS.2009.5409832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we simulate four famous algorithms in DOA and then compare the algorithms based on their finding and estmating of the accuracy level angels from two different users, having demonstrated the result of simulation of the four algorithms in comparison tables, it is observed that ROOT-MUSIC algorithm have high level of accuracy in estimation of close angles(28, 30 degrees). MUSIC, Spatially Smoothed and ML algorithms have the next steps in accuracy respectively.","PeriodicalId":300247,"journal":{"name":"2009 Mediterrannean Microwave Symposium (MMS)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing accuracy for ML, MUSIC, ROOT-MUSIC and spatially smoothed algorithms for 2 users\",\"authors\":\"M. Jalali, Mohamad Naser Moghaddasi, Alireza Habibzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MMS.2009.5409832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article we simulate four famous algorithms in DOA and then compare the algorithms based on their finding and estmating of the accuracy level angels from two different users, having demonstrated the result of simulation of the four algorithms in comparison tables, it is observed that ROOT-MUSIC algorithm have high level of accuracy in estimation of close angles(28, 30 degrees). MUSIC, Spatially Smoothed and ML algorithms have the next steps in accuracy respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 Mediterrannean Microwave Symposium (MMS)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 Mediterrannean Microwave Symposium (MMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMS.2009.5409832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Mediterrannean Microwave Symposium (MMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMS.2009.5409832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

本文对四种著名的DOA算法进行了仿真,并通过对两种不同用户的精度水平角的发现和估计进行了比较,在比较表中展示了四种算法的仿真结果,可以看出ROOT-MUSIC算法在近角(28,30度)估计方面具有很高的精度。MUSIC、spatial Smoothed和ML算法分别在精度上有了下一步的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing accuracy for ML, MUSIC, ROOT-MUSIC and spatially smoothed algorithms for 2 users
In this article we simulate four famous algorithms in DOA and then compare the algorithms based on their finding and estmating of the accuracy level angels from two different users, having demonstrated the result of simulation of the four algorithms in comparison tables, it is observed that ROOT-MUSIC algorithm have high level of accuracy in estimation of close angles(28, 30 degrees). MUSIC, Spatially Smoothed and ML algorithms have the next steps in accuracy respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信