第四次工业革命中的ESG重要性因素——通过动态重要性衡量利益相关者的外部性

G. Bala, Shirley Birman, James Cardamone, Thomas Kuh, Adam Salvatori, N. Stelea
{"title":"第四次工业革命中的ESG重要性因素——通过动态重要性衡量利益相关者的外部性","authors":"G. Bala, Shirley Birman, James Cardamone, Thomas Kuh, Adam Salvatori, N. Stelea","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3751058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Materiality is the notion in accounting that applies to information that is important for an investment decision and is central to the definition of fiduciary duty. Recently ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) investors have coalesced around the concept of dynamic materiality, Dynamic Materiality™ is the concept that companies, industries, and sectors have unique materiality signatures that evolve over time, determined by factors such as shifts in business models, changing consumer preferences, emerging technologies and new regulations. Dynamic Materiality is driven by how stakeholders respond to events, behavior and externalities experienced in relation to a company or an industry. This stands in contrast to the view that materiality is relatively static and can be defined by a company. We expand on Dynamic Materiality to provide empirical evidence that materiality has distinct dimensions in addition to industry and sector: region, country, economic development, and company size. These dimensions underpin the Truvalue ESG Materiality Factors, the first holistic materiality approach. We examine how the Materiality Signatures evolves across these dimensions. Furthermore, we present evidence that conventional ESG research frameworks operating on a single global materiality model are no longer suitable in the age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.","PeriodicalId":133716,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Non-Pecuniary Motivation & Incentives (Topic)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESG Materiality Factors in the Fourth Industrial Revolution - Measuring Stakeholder Externalities via Dynamic Materiality\",\"authors\":\"G. Bala, Shirley Birman, James Cardamone, Thomas Kuh, Adam Salvatori, N. Stelea\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3751058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Materiality is the notion in accounting that applies to information that is important for an investment decision and is central to the definition of fiduciary duty. Recently ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) investors have coalesced around the concept of dynamic materiality, Dynamic Materiality™ is the concept that companies, industries, and sectors have unique materiality signatures that evolve over time, determined by factors such as shifts in business models, changing consumer preferences, emerging technologies and new regulations. Dynamic Materiality is driven by how stakeholders respond to events, behavior and externalities experienced in relation to a company or an industry. This stands in contrast to the view that materiality is relatively static and can be defined by a company. We expand on Dynamic Materiality to provide empirical evidence that materiality has distinct dimensions in addition to industry and sector: region, country, economic development, and company size. These dimensions underpin the Truvalue ESG Materiality Factors, the first holistic materiality approach. We examine how the Materiality Signatures evolves across these dimensions. Furthermore, we present evidence that conventional ESG research frameworks operating on a single global materiality model are no longer suitable in the age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Non-Pecuniary Motivation & Incentives (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Non-Pecuniary Motivation & Incentives (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3751058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Non-Pecuniary Motivation & Incentives (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3751058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

重要性是会计中的一个概念,适用于对投资决策很重要的信息,是信义义务定义的核心。最近,ESG(环境、社会和治理)投资者开始关注动态重要性的概念。动态重要性是指公司、行业和部门具有独特的重要性特征,这些特征随着时间的推移而演变,由商业模式的转变、消费者偏好的变化、新兴技术和新法规等因素决定。动态重要性是由利益相关者如何对与公司或行业相关的事件、行为和外部性做出反应所驱动的。这与认为重要性是相对静态的,可以由公司定义的观点形成对比。我们对动态重要性进行了扩展,以提供经验证据,证明除了行业和部门之外,重要性还具有不同的维度:地区、国家、经济发展和公司规模。这些维度是第一个整体重要性方法——真实价值ESG重要性因素的基础。我们将研究这些维度上的物质特征是如何演变的。此外,我们提供的证据表明,基于单一全球重要性模型的传统ESG研究框架不再适用于第四次工业革命时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ESG Materiality Factors in the Fourth Industrial Revolution - Measuring Stakeholder Externalities via Dynamic Materiality
Materiality is the notion in accounting that applies to information that is important for an investment decision and is central to the definition of fiduciary duty. Recently ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) investors have coalesced around the concept of dynamic materiality, Dynamic Materiality™ is the concept that companies, industries, and sectors have unique materiality signatures that evolve over time, determined by factors such as shifts in business models, changing consumer preferences, emerging technologies and new regulations. Dynamic Materiality is driven by how stakeholders respond to events, behavior and externalities experienced in relation to a company or an industry. This stands in contrast to the view that materiality is relatively static and can be defined by a company. We expand on Dynamic Materiality to provide empirical evidence that materiality has distinct dimensions in addition to industry and sector: region, country, economic development, and company size. These dimensions underpin the Truvalue ESG Materiality Factors, the first holistic materiality approach. We examine how the Materiality Signatures evolves across these dimensions. Furthermore, we present evidence that conventional ESG research frameworks operating on a single global materiality model are no longer suitable in the age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信