演进:对于软件开发来说,是一种比精化更实用的方法

Shaoying Liu
{"title":"演进:对于软件开发来说,是一种比精化更实用的方法","authors":"Shaoying Liu","doi":"10.1109/ICECCS.1997.622305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Refinement of operations is well defined in terms of refinement rules and is considered as a reasonable discipline for software development. This paper, however, observes that refinement is not sufficient to serve this role for the entire software development process and then proposes evolution for substitution. We show that refinement is indeed a special case of evolution and evolution is transitive. A small case study is given to demonstrate that using evolution rather than refinement as the discipline for software development is a more practical approach. The idea presented in this paper may be controversial, but the author believes that this idea is more useful, practical, and instructive than refinement approach, and expects to inspire more discussions about this issue.","PeriodicalId":168372,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Third IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (Cat. No.97TB100168)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution: a more practical approach than refinement for software development\",\"authors\":\"Shaoying Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICECCS.1997.622305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Refinement of operations is well defined in terms of refinement rules and is considered as a reasonable discipline for software development. This paper, however, observes that refinement is not sufficient to serve this role for the entire software development process and then proposes evolution for substitution. We show that refinement is indeed a special case of evolution and evolution is transitive. A small case study is given to demonstrate that using evolution rather than refinement as the discipline for software development is a more practical approach. The idea presented in this paper may be controversial, but the author believes that this idea is more useful, practical, and instructive than refinement approach, and expects to inspire more discussions about this issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Third IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (Cat. No.97TB100168)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Third IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (Cat. No.97TB100168)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCS.1997.622305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Third IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (Cat. No.97TB100168)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCS.1997.622305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

操作的细化在细化规则方面得到了很好的定义,并且被认为是软件开发的合理规程。然而,本文观察到,细化不足以在整个软件开发过程中发挥这一作用,然后提出了替代的进化。我们证明了细化确实是进化的一个特例,而进化是可传递的。本文给出了一个小的案例研究来证明使用进化而不是精化作为软件开发的原则是一种更实用的方法。本文提出的思想可能存在争议,但笔者认为这种思想比精化方法更有用、更实用、更有启发性,并希望能激发更多关于这一问题的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evolution: a more practical approach than refinement for software development
Refinement of operations is well defined in terms of refinement rules and is considered as a reasonable discipline for software development. This paper, however, observes that refinement is not sufficient to serve this role for the entire software development process and then proposes evolution for substitution. We show that refinement is indeed a special case of evolution and evolution is transitive. A small case study is given to demonstrate that using evolution rather than refinement as the discipline for software development is a more practical approach. The idea presented in this paper may be controversial, but the author believes that this idea is more useful, practical, and instructive than refinement approach, and expects to inspire more discussions about this issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信