通过异同探索周边。16世纪末和17世纪英语地理出版物中波兰-立陶宛、莫斯科公国和土耳其的比较

{"title":"通过异同探索周边。16世纪末和17世纪英语地理出版物中波兰-立陶宛、莫斯科公国和土耳其的比较","authors":"","doi":"10.36693/202004p.815-825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exploring peripheries through similarities and differences.\nComparisons between Poland-Lithuania, Muscovy and Turkey in English\nchorographic publications of the late 16th and the 17th century\nThe paper deals with the way English geographical and historical texts may have influenced\nthe perception of three eastern states with which England maintained relations in the late 16th\nand early 17th centuries: Poland-Lithuania, Muscovy and Turkey. All three — irrespective of\ntheir geographical distance and peripheral locations — became important for England in the\nlate 16th century because of their economic and political potential. This resulted in a surge\nof interest in Poland, Turkey and Russia, and provided a significantly broader context in\nwhich they were presented in the emerging English public sphere. The focus of the article is\non answering the questions whether the fundamental political and confessional differences\nbetween the three states had a significant impact on the way they were presented by English\nauthors of chorographic publications, how peripheral they were considered to be — in\ncomparison to other political entities on the continent — and whether there the differences\nand the similarities discussed in these texts were the good indication of their specificity","PeriodicalId":146426,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Historyczny","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring peripheries through similarities and differences . Comparisons between Poland-Lithuania, Muscovy and Turkey in English chorographic publications of the late 16th and the 17th century\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.36693/202004p.815-825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Exploring peripheries through similarities and differences.\\nComparisons between Poland-Lithuania, Muscovy and Turkey in English\\nchorographic publications of the late 16th and the 17th century\\nThe paper deals with the way English geographical and historical texts may have influenced\\nthe perception of three eastern states with which England maintained relations in the late 16th\\nand early 17th centuries: Poland-Lithuania, Muscovy and Turkey. All three — irrespective of\\ntheir geographical distance and peripheral locations — became important for England in the\\nlate 16th century because of their economic and political potential. This resulted in a surge\\nof interest in Poland, Turkey and Russia, and provided a significantly broader context in\\nwhich they were presented in the emerging English public sphere. The focus of the article is\\non answering the questions whether the fundamental political and confessional differences\\nbetween the three states had a significant impact on the way they were presented by English\\nauthors of chorographic publications, how peripheral they were considered to be — in\\ncomparison to other political entities on the continent — and whether there the differences\\nand the similarities discussed in these texts were the good indication of their specificity\",\"PeriodicalId\":146426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przegląd Historyczny\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przegląd Historyczny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36693/202004p.815-825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Historyczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36693/202004p.815-825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通过异同探索周边。16世纪末和17世纪英语地理出版物中波兰-立陶宛、莫斯科公国和土耳其的比较本文探讨了英语地理和历史文本可能影响了英国在16世纪末和17世纪初与之保持关系的三个东部国家的看法:波兰-立陶宛、莫斯科公国和土耳其。这三个城市——不管它们的地理距离和外围位置如何——在16世纪后期对英国来说都很重要,因为它们的经济和政治潜力。这导致了对波兰、土耳其和俄罗斯的兴趣激增,并为它们在新兴的英国公共领域的呈现提供了一个明显更广泛的背景。这篇文章的重点是回答以下问题:三个国家之间的基本政治和信仰差异是否对英国地理学出版物的作者呈现它们的方式产生了重大影响,与欧洲大陆上的其他政治实体相比,它们被认为是多么的边缘,以及这些文本中讨论的差异和相似之处是否很好地表明了它们的特殊性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring peripheries through similarities and differences . Comparisons between Poland-Lithuania, Muscovy and Turkey in English chorographic publications of the late 16th and the 17th century
Exploring peripheries through similarities and differences. Comparisons between Poland-Lithuania, Muscovy and Turkey in English chorographic publications of the late 16th and the 17th century The paper deals with the way English geographical and historical texts may have influenced the perception of three eastern states with which England maintained relations in the late 16th and early 17th centuries: Poland-Lithuania, Muscovy and Turkey. All three — irrespective of their geographical distance and peripheral locations — became important for England in the late 16th century because of their economic and political potential. This resulted in a surge of interest in Poland, Turkey and Russia, and provided a significantly broader context in which they were presented in the emerging English public sphere. The focus of the article is on answering the questions whether the fundamental political and confessional differences between the three states had a significant impact on the way they were presented by English authors of chorographic publications, how peripheral they were considered to be — in comparison to other political entities on the continent — and whether there the differences and the similarities discussed in these texts were the good indication of their specificity
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信