“创造周围”悖论

D. Burk
{"title":"“创造周围”悖论","authors":"D. Burk","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/s5ymw","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his article on Creating Around Copyright, Joseph Fishman argues that the constraints imposed by copyright law promote the creativity of subsequent follow-on authors. He suggests that by limiting creative choices, copyright exclusivity may actually enhances the output of follow-on authors by requiring them to “create around” existing works. Yet embedded in Professor Fishman’s theory is a paradox that threatens to disable the putative benefits of creating around. Specifically, the conditions that are necessary for creating around are the same conditions that we would expect to lead to licensing of previously existing works, rather than to the creation of new ones. In other words, it appears that creating around can only occur when we would expect it not to occur. In this essay I illuminate this problem, showing how the logic of Fishman’s argument leads inevitably to this paradox, and I offer several suggestions as to how one might escape the creating around paradox.","PeriodicalId":276560,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Innovation eJournal","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 'Creating Around' Paradox\",\"authors\":\"D. Burk\",\"doi\":\"10.31235/osf.io/s5ymw\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his article on Creating Around Copyright, Joseph Fishman argues that the constraints imposed by copyright law promote the creativity of subsequent follow-on authors. He suggests that by limiting creative choices, copyright exclusivity may actually enhances the output of follow-on authors by requiring them to “create around” existing works. Yet embedded in Professor Fishman’s theory is a paradox that threatens to disable the putative benefits of creating around. Specifically, the conditions that are necessary for creating around are the same conditions that we would expect to lead to licensing of previously existing works, rather than to the creation of new ones. In other words, it appears that creating around can only occur when we would expect it not to occur. In this essay I illuminate this problem, showing how the logic of Fishman’s argument leads inevitably to this paradox, and I offer several suggestions as to how one might escape the creating around paradox.\",\"PeriodicalId\":276560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Innovation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Innovation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/s5ymw\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/s5ymw","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《围绕版权进行创作》一文中,约瑟夫·菲什曼认为,版权法的约束促进了后续作者的创造力。他认为,通过限制创造性的选择,版权排他性实际上可能会通过要求后续作者“围绕”现有作品进行创作,从而提高后续作者的产出。然而,菲什曼教授的理论中包含着一个悖论,它可能会使周围创造的假定好处失效。具体来说,创作所必需的条件与我们所期望的导致先前存在的作品的许可而不是创造新作品的条件相同。换句话说,似乎只有当我们期望它不会发生时,创造才会发生。在这篇文章中,我阐明了这个问题,展示了菲什曼论证的逻辑是如何不可避免地导致这个悖论的,并且我提供了一些关于如何摆脱创造悖论的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The 'Creating Around' Paradox
In his article on Creating Around Copyright, Joseph Fishman argues that the constraints imposed by copyright law promote the creativity of subsequent follow-on authors. He suggests that by limiting creative choices, copyright exclusivity may actually enhances the output of follow-on authors by requiring them to “create around” existing works. Yet embedded in Professor Fishman’s theory is a paradox that threatens to disable the putative benefits of creating around. Specifically, the conditions that are necessary for creating around are the same conditions that we would expect to lead to licensing of previously existing works, rather than to the creation of new ones. In other words, it appears that creating around can only occur when we would expect it not to occur. In this essay I illuminate this problem, showing how the logic of Fishman’s argument leads inevitably to this paradox, and I offer several suggestions as to how one might escape the creating around paradox.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信