{"title":"1873年法国的罪行:评论","authors":"C. Kindleberger","doi":"10.1353/cap.2022.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The paper, written in 1998, discusses competing interpretations for international flows of gold and silver following the California and Australia gold discoveries. Against monetary interpretations of the “Eastern Drain,” it reasserts the importance of autonomous flows of silver to the East and in particular to India, as rooted in habits and cultural norms and independent from the international price mechanism.","PeriodicalId":243846,"journal":{"name":"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The French Crime of 1873: A Comment\",\"authors\":\"C. Kindleberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cap.2022.0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The paper, written in 1998, discusses competing interpretations for international flows of gold and silver following the California and Australia gold discoveries. Against monetary interpretations of the “Eastern Drain,” it reasserts the importance of autonomous flows of silver to the East and in particular to India, as rooted in habits and cultural norms and independent from the international price mechanism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cap.2022.0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cap.2022.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:The paper, written in 1998, discusses competing interpretations for international flows of gold and silver following the California and Australia gold discoveries. Against monetary interpretations of the “Eastern Drain,” it reasserts the importance of autonomous flows of silver to the East and in particular to India, as rooted in habits and cultural norms and independent from the international price mechanism.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
