恢复数据科学和互联网行业研究伦理的知情同意历史

Elaine Sedenberg, A. Hoffmann
{"title":"恢复数据科学和互联网行业研究伦理的知情同意历史","authors":"Elaine Sedenberg, A. Hoffmann","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2837585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Respect for persons is a cornerstone value for any conception of research ethics—though how to best realize respect in practice is an ongoing question. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, “informed consent” emerged as a particular way to operationalize respect in medical and behavioral research contexts. Today, informed consent has been challenged by increasingly advanced networked information and communication technologies (ICTs) and the massive amounts of data they produce—challenges that have led many researchers and private companies to abandon informed consent as untenable or infeasible online.Against any easy dismissal, we aim to recover insights from the history of informed consent as it developed from the late 19th century to today. With a particular focus on the United States policy context, we show how informed consent is not a fixed or monolithic concept that should be abandoned in view of new data-intensive and technological practices, but rather it is a mechanism that has always been fluid—it has constantly evolved alongside the specific contexts and practices it is intended to regulate. Building on this insight, we articulate some specific challenges and lessons from the history of informed consent that stand to benefit current discussions of informed consent and research ethics in the context of data science and Internet industry research.","PeriodicalId":175866,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Political Processes","volume":"22 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recovering the History of Informed Consent for Data Science and Internet Industry Research Ethics\",\"authors\":\"Elaine Sedenberg, A. Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2837585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Respect for persons is a cornerstone value for any conception of research ethics—though how to best realize respect in practice is an ongoing question. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, “informed consent” emerged as a particular way to operationalize respect in medical and behavioral research contexts. Today, informed consent has been challenged by increasingly advanced networked information and communication technologies (ICTs) and the massive amounts of data they produce—challenges that have led many researchers and private companies to abandon informed consent as untenable or infeasible online.Against any easy dismissal, we aim to recover insights from the history of informed consent as it developed from the late 19th century to today. With a particular focus on the United States policy context, we show how informed consent is not a fixed or monolithic concept that should be abandoned in view of new data-intensive and technological practices, but rather it is a mechanism that has always been fluid—it has constantly evolved alongside the specific contexts and practices it is intended to regulate. Building on this insight, we articulate some specific challenges and lessons from the history of informed consent that stand to benefit current discussions of informed consent and research ethics in the context of data science and Internet industry research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRN: Political Processes\",\"volume\":\"22 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRN: Political Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2837585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Political Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2837585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

对人的尊重是任何研究伦理概念的基石价值——尽管如何在实践中最好地实现尊重是一个持续的问题。在19世纪末和20世纪初,“知情同意”作为在医学和行为研究背景下实施尊重的一种特殊方式出现。今天,知情同意受到日益先进的网络信息通信技术(ict)及其产生的大量数据的挑战,这些挑战导致许多研究人员和私营公司放弃了知情同意,认为这在网上是站不住脚或不可行的。为了反对任何轻易的否定,我们的目标是从19世纪末到今天的知情同意的发展历史中恢复洞察力。通过对美国政策背景的特别关注,我们展示了知情同意如何不是一个固定的或单一的概念,鉴于新的数据密集型和技术实践,应该放弃,而是一种始终是流动的机制,它随着其旨在规范的特定背景和实践而不断发展。在此基础上,我们从知情同意的历史中阐述了一些具体的挑战和教训,这些挑战和教训将有利于当前在数据科学和互联网行业研究背景下对知情同意和研究伦理的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recovering the History of Informed Consent for Data Science and Internet Industry Research Ethics
Respect for persons is a cornerstone value for any conception of research ethics—though how to best realize respect in practice is an ongoing question. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, “informed consent” emerged as a particular way to operationalize respect in medical and behavioral research contexts. Today, informed consent has been challenged by increasingly advanced networked information and communication technologies (ICTs) and the massive amounts of data they produce—challenges that have led many researchers and private companies to abandon informed consent as untenable or infeasible online.Against any easy dismissal, we aim to recover insights from the history of informed consent as it developed from the late 19th century to today. With a particular focus on the United States policy context, we show how informed consent is not a fixed or monolithic concept that should be abandoned in view of new data-intensive and technological practices, but rather it is a mechanism that has always been fluid—it has constantly evolved alongside the specific contexts and practices it is intended to regulate. Building on this insight, we articulate some specific challenges and lessons from the history of informed consent that stand to benefit current discussions of informed consent and research ethics in the context of data science and Internet industry research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信