预防性固定比主动监测单侧股骨骨骺滑动未受影响的对侧髋关节更好吗?-系统检讨

V. Shetty, K. Akhtar
{"title":"预防性固定比主动监测单侧股骨骨骺滑动未受影响的对侧髋关节更好吗?-系统检讨","authors":"V. Shetty, K. Akhtar","doi":"10.37515/ortho.8231.4105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is one of the commonest musculoskeletal disorders amongst children. Whilst its management is reasonable well established, the treatment of the unaffected contralateral hip is controversial. The incidence of subsequent contralateral slip has been reported to be between 19 and 63%. The two treatment modalities are prophylactic fixation at initial presentation or active surveillance and fixation on diagnoses of subsequent slip. Both approaches have their merits but there is no clear consensus. Known risk factors include age, sex, young age at initial presentation, endocrine disorders and obesity. Clinical, epidemiological and radiological predictors have been assessed retrospectively but have limited prospective accuracy. We performed a systematic review of the existing literature as per PRISMA guidelines to determine which treatment modality is more effective. Qualitative analysis of the literature also yielded interesting insights into different aspects of the management of the contralateral hip in unilateral SCFE.","PeriodicalId":252930,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is prophylactic fixation preferable to active surveillance of the unaffected contralateral hip in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis?- A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"V. Shetty, K. Akhtar\",\"doi\":\"10.37515/ortho.8231.4105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is one of the commonest musculoskeletal disorders amongst children. Whilst its management is reasonable well established, the treatment of the unaffected contralateral hip is controversial. The incidence of subsequent contralateral slip has been reported to be between 19 and 63%. The two treatment modalities are prophylactic fixation at initial presentation or active surveillance and fixation on diagnoses of subsequent slip. Both approaches have their merits but there is no clear consensus. Known risk factors include age, sex, young age at initial presentation, endocrine disorders and obesity. Clinical, epidemiological and radiological predictors have been assessed retrospectively but have limited prospective accuracy. We performed a systematic review of the existing literature as per PRISMA guidelines to determine which treatment modality is more effective. Qualitative analysis of the literature also yielded interesting insights into different aspects of the management of the contralateral hip in unilateral SCFE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37515/ortho.8231.4105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37515/ortho.8231.4105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

股骨头骨骺滑动是儿童中最常见的肌肉骨骼疾病之一。虽然其治疗是合理的,但未受影响的对侧髋关节的治疗是有争议的。据报道,随后对侧滑动的发生率在19%至63%之间。两种治疗方式是预防性固定在最初的表现或积极监测和固定诊断随后的滑。这两种方法各有优点,但没有明确的共识。已知的危险因素包括年龄、性别、初诊年龄小、内分泌失调和肥胖。临床、流行病学和放射学预测指标已进行回顾性评估,但前瞻性准确性有限。我们根据PRISMA指南对现有文献进行了系统回顾,以确定哪种治疗方式更有效。对文献的定性分析也对单侧SCFE对侧髋关节处理的不同方面产生了有趣的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is prophylactic fixation preferable to active surveillance of the unaffected contralateral hip in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis?- A Systematic Review
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is one of the commonest musculoskeletal disorders amongst children. Whilst its management is reasonable well established, the treatment of the unaffected contralateral hip is controversial. The incidence of subsequent contralateral slip has been reported to be between 19 and 63%. The two treatment modalities are prophylactic fixation at initial presentation or active surveillance and fixation on diagnoses of subsequent slip. Both approaches have their merits but there is no clear consensus. Known risk factors include age, sex, young age at initial presentation, endocrine disorders and obesity. Clinical, epidemiological and radiological predictors have been assessed retrospectively but have limited prospective accuracy. We performed a systematic review of the existing literature as per PRISMA guidelines to determine which treatment modality is more effective. Qualitative analysis of the literature also yielded interesting insights into different aspects of the management of the contralateral hip in unilateral SCFE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信