残疾了,但代价是什么?轮椅路由算法的检验

Benjamin Tannert, Johannes Schöning
{"title":"残疾了,但代价是什么?轮椅路由算法的检验","authors":"Benjamin Tannert, Johannes Schöning","doi":"10.1145/3229434.3229458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Platforms like Google Maps or Bing Maps are used by a large number of users to find the shortest path to their destinations. While these services mainly focus on supporting drivers and pedestrians, first services exist that support wheelchair users. Routing algorithms for wheelchair users try to avoid obstacles like stairs or bollards and optimize on criteria like surface properties and slope of the route. In this study, we undertake the first controlled examination of wheelchair routing approaches. By analyzing three routing platforms, including two wheelchair routing algorithms and three pedestrian routing algorithms, across fifteen major cities in Germany, our results highlight that the routes for wheelchair users are significantly longer and partially also more complex than those for pedestrians. In addition, we show that today's pedestrian routing algorithms also output very diverse routes.","PeriodicalId":344738,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disabled, but at what cost?: an examination of wheelchair routing algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Tannert, Johannes Schöning\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3229434.3229458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Platforms like Google Maps or Bing Maps are used by a large number of users to find the shortest path to their destinations. While these services mainly focus on supporting drivers and pedestrians, first services exist that support wheelchair users. Routing algorithms for wheelchair users try to avoid obstacles like stairs or bollards and optimize on criteria like surface properties and slope of the route. In this study, we undertake the first controlled examination of wheelchair routing approaches. By analyzing three routing platforms, including two wheelchair routing algorithms and three pedestrian routing algorithms, across fifteen major cities in Germany, our results highlight that the routes for wheelchair users are significantly longer and partially also more complex than those for pedestrians. In addition, we show that today's pedestrian routing algorithms also output very diverse routes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434.3229458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434.3229458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

谷歌地图(Google Maps)或必应地图(Bing Maps)等平台被大量用户用来寻找到达目的地的最短路径。虽然这些服务主要侧重于支持司机和行人,但首先存在支持轮椅使用者的服务。针对轮椅使用者的路线算法试图避开楼梯或护柱等障碍物,并根据路线的表面特性和坡度等标准进行优化。在这项研究中,我们进行了轮椅路线方法的第一次控制检查。通过分析德国15个主要城市的三种路由平台,包括两种轮椅路由算法和三种行人路由算法,我们的研究结果强调了轮椅用户的路径明显比行人的路径更长,部分也更复杂。此外,我们表明,今天的行人路由算法也输出非常多样化的路线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disabled, but at what cost?: an examination of wheelchair routing algorithms
Platforms like Google Maps or Bing Maps are used by a large number of users to find the shortest path to their destinations. While these services mainly focus on supporting drivers and pedestrians, first services exist that support wheelchair users. Routing algorithms for wheelchair users try to avoid obstacles like stairs or bollards and optimize on criteria like surface properties and slope of the route. In this study, we undertake the first controlled examination of wheelchair routing approaches. By analyzing three routing platforms, including two wheelchair routing algorithms and three pedestrian routing algorithms, across fifteen major cities in Germany, our results highlight that the routes for wheelchair users are significantly longer and partially also more complex than those for pedestrians. In addition, we show that today's pedestrian routing algorithms also output very diverse routes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信