{"title":"横贯大陆论与非洲中心论","authors":"S. Osha, Samir Rebiai, S. Adem, Khedidja Mokeddem","doi":"10.57054/arb.v13i2.4886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wim M. J. van Binsbergen’s work, Before the Presocratics (2012), presents a kaleidoscopic assessment of regional and global epistemic traditions and configurations before the advent of ancient Greek thought (see also 2011a–d; 2012b–f;2013). He is concerned about interrogating worlds that relate to Afrocentricity, employing an impressive assemblage of specialties, namely, protohistory, archaeology, comparative ethnography, comparative mythology, comparative linguisticsand genetics. His central thesis is that rather than viewing different regional epistemic formations as singular and distinct,it is more appropriate to understand them as being part of a global and historical continuum of knowledge traditionsthat are perpetually subject to migration and transformation – in short, all the elements of transplantation and dispersal. In this light, the strict separation between regional and ethnic knowledge becomesmisguided and often preposterous.","PeriodicalId":170362,"journal":{"name":"Africa Review of Books","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcontinentality versus Afrocentricity\",\"authors\":\"S. Osha, Samir Rebiai, S. Adem, Khedidja Mokeddem\",\"doi\":\"10.57054/arb.v13i2.4886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wim M. J. van Binsbergen’s work, Before the Presocratics (2012), presents a kaleidoscopic assessment of regional and global epistemic traditions and configurations before the advent of ancient Greek thought (see also 2011a–d; 2012b–f;2013). He is concerned about interrogating worlds that relate to Afrocentricity, employing an impressive assemblage of specialties, namely, protohistory, archaeology, comparative ethnography, comparative mythology, comparative linguisticsand genetics. His central thesis is that rather than viewing different regional epistemic formations as singular and distinct,it is more appropriate to understand them as being part of a global and historical continuum of knowledge traditionsthat are perpetually subject to migration and transformation – in short, all the elements of transplantation and dispersal. In this light, the strict separation between regional and ethnic knowledge becomesmisguided and often preposterous.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Africa Review of Books\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Africa Review of Books\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57054/arb.v13i2.4886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa Review of Books","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57054/arb.v13i2.4886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Wim M. J. van Binsbergen的著作《前苏格拉底之前》(2012)对古希腊思想出现之前的区域和全球认知传统和配置进行了万花齐转的评估(参见2011 - d;2012 b-f; 2013)。他专注于探究与非洲中心主义相关的世界,运用了令人印象深刻的专业组合,即原生史、考古学、比较民族志、比较神话学、比较语言学和遗传学。他的中心论点是,与其将不同地区的认知形成视为单一和独特的,不如将它们理解为知识传统的全球和历史连续体的一部分,这些传统永远受到迁移和转变的影响——简而言之,所有移植和分散的因素。从这个角度来看,严格区分地域知识和民族知识是错误的,而且往往是荒谬的。
Wim M. J. van Binsbergen’s work, Before the Presocratics (2012), presents a kaleidoscopic assessment of regional and global epistemic traditions and configurations before the advent of ancient Greek thought (see also 2011a–d; 2012b–f;2013). He is concerned about interrogating worlds that relate to Afrocentricity, employing an impressive assemblage of specialties, namely, protohistory, archaeology, comparative ethnography, comparative mythology, comparative linguisticsand genetics. His central thesis is that rather than viewing different regional epistemic formations as singular and distinct,it is more appropriate to understand them as being part of a global and historical continuum of knowledge traditionsthat are perpetually subject to migration and transformation – in short, all the elements of transplantation and dispersal. In this light, the strict separation between regional and ethnic knowledge becomesmisguided and often preposterous.