横贯大陆论与非洲中心论

S. Osha, Samir Rebiai, S. Adem, Khedidja Mokeddem
{"title":"横贯大陆论与非洲中心论","authors":"S. Osha, Samir Rebiai, S. Adem, Khedidja Mokeddem","doi":"10.57054/arb.v13i2.4886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wim M. J. van Binsbergen’s work, Before the Presocratics (2012), presents a kaleidoscopic assessment of regional and global epistemic traditions and configurations before the advent of ancient Greek thought (see also 2011a–d; 2012b–f;2013). He is concerned about interrogating worlds that relate to Afrocentricity, employing an impressive assemblage of specialties, namely, protohistory, archaeology, comparative ethnography, comparative mythology, comparative linguisticsand genetics. His central thesis is that rather than viewing different regional epistemic formations as singular and distinct,it is more appropriate to understand them as being part of a global and historical continuum of knowledge traditionsthat are perpetually subject to migration and transformation – in short, all the elements of transplantation and dispersal. In this light, the strict separation between regional and ethnic knowledge becomesmisguided and often preposterous.","PeriodicalId":170362,"journal":{"name":"Africa Review of Books","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcontinentality versus Afrocentricity\",\"authors\":\"S. Osha, Samir Rebiai, S. Adem, Khedidja Mokeddem\",\"doi\":\"10.57054/arb.v13i2.4886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wim M. J. van Binsbergen’s work, Before the Presocratics (2012), presents a kaleidoscopic assessment of regional and global epistemic traditions and configurations before the advent of ancient Greek thought (see also 2011a–d; 2012b–f;2013). He is concerned about interrogating worlds that relate to Afrocentricity, employing an impressive assemblage of specialties, namely, protohistory, archaeology, comparative ethnography, comparative mythology, comparative linguisticsand genetics. His central thesis is that rather than viewing different regional epistemic formations as singular and distinct,it is more appropriate to understand them as being part of a global and historical continuum of knowledge traditionsthat are perpetually subject to migration and transformation – in short, all the elements of transplantation and dispersal. In this light, the strict separation between regional and ethnic knowledge becomesmisguided and often preposterous.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Africa Review of Books\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Africa Review of Books\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57054/arb.v13i2.4886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa Review of Books","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57054/arb.v13i2.4886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Wim M. J. van Binsbergen的著作《前苏格拉底之前》(2012)对古希腊思想出现之前的区域和全球认知传统和配置进行了万花齐转的评估(参见2011 - d;2012 b-f; 2013)。他专注于探究与非洲中心主义相关的世界,运用了令人印象深刻的专业组合,即原生史、考古学、比较民族志、比较神话学、比较语言学和遗传学。他的中心论点是,与其将不同地区的认知形成视为单一和独特的,不如将它们理解为知识传统的全球和历史连续体的一部分,这些传统永远受到迁移和转变的影响——简而言之,所有移植和分散的因素。从这个角度来看,严格区分地域知识和民族知识是错误的,而且往往是荒谬的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcontinentality versus Afrocentricity
Wim M. J. van Binsbergen’s work, Before the Presocratics (2012), presents a kaleidoscopic assessment of regional and global epistemic traditions and configurations before the advent of ancient Greek thought (see also 2011a–d; 2012b–f;2013). He is concerned about interrogating worlds that relate to Afrocentricity, employing an impressive assemblage of specialties, namely, protohistory, archaeology, comparative ethnography, comparative mythology, comparative linguisticsand genetics. His central thesis is that rather than viewing different regional epistemic formations as singular and distinct,it is more appropriate to understand them as being part of a global and historical continuum of knowledge traditionsthat are perpetually subject to migration and transformation – in short, all the elements of transplantation and dispersal. In this light, the strict separation between regional and ethnic knowledge becomesmisguided and often preposterous.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信