{"title":"解构汤加斯国家森林管理中的木材量范式。","authors":"J. Caouette, M. Kramer, G. Nowacki","doi":"10.2737/PNW-GTR-482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caouette, John P.; Kramer, Marc G.; Nowacki, Gregory J. 2000. Deconstructing the timber volume paradigm in management of the Tongass National Forest. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-482. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 20 p. (Shaw, Charles G., III, tech. coord.; Conservation and resource assesments for the Tongass land management plan revision). Timber volume information and associated maps have been widely used in the Tongass National Forest for land-use planning and timber and wildlife management. Although considerable effort has been expended to improve timber volume maps, little has been done to evaluate the suitability of timber volume as a descriptor of forest character. We established a rough indicator of forest structure that uses trees per acre and quadratic mean diameter to examine the relation between timber volume and forest structure. Results indicated that timber volume and forest structure are not interchangeable attributes. Results also indicated that the original photinterpreted timber volume stratification did not always capture differences in timber volume but may have captured differences in forest structure. The recently revised timber volume stratification provides more reliable timber volume information, but it sacrifices structural information in the process.","PeriodicalId":282363,"journal":{"name":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deconstructing the timber volume paradigm in management of the Tongass National Forest.\",\"authors\":\"J. Caouette, M. Kramer, G. Nowacki\",\"doi\":\"10.2737/PNW-GTR-482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Caouette, John P.; Kramer, Marc G.; Nowacki, Gregory J. 2000. Deconstructing the timber volume paradigm in management of the Tongass National Forest. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-482. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 20 p. (Shaw, Charles G., III, tech. coord.; Conservation and resource assesments for the Tongass land management plan revision). Timber volume information and associated maps have been widely used in the Tongass National Forest for land-use planning and timber and wildlife management. Although considerable effort has been expended to improve timber volume maps, little has been done to evaluate the suitability of timber volume as a descriptor of forest character. We established a rough indicator of forest structure that uses trees per acre and quadratic mean diameter to examine the relation between timber volume and forest structure. Results indicated that timber volume and forest structure are not interchangeable attributes. Results also indicated that the original photinterpreted timber volume stratification did not always capture differences in timber volume but may have captured differences in forest structure. The recently revised timber volume stratification provides more reliable timber volume information, but it sacrifices structural information in the process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
约翰·p·考埃特;马克·g·克莱默;Gregory Nowacki, 2000。解构汤加斯国家森林管理中的木材量范式。将军技术代表PNW-GTR-482。波特兰,俄勒冈州:美国农业部,林务局,太平洋西北研究站,p. 20 (Shaw, Charles G., III, tech. coord;汤加斯土地管理计划修订的保护和资源评估)。在通加斯国家森林,木材量资料和有关地图已广泛用于土地使用规划以及木材和野生动物管理。虽然为改进木材量图作出了相当大的努力,但很少评价木材量作为森林特征描述符的适宜性。我们建立了一个粗略的森林结构指标,用每英亩树木数和二次平均直径来考察木材量与森林结构的关系。结果表明,木材量和森林结构是不可互换的属性。结果还表明,原始的光解译木材体积分层并不总是捕获木材体积的差异,但可能捕获森林结构的差异。最近修订的木材体积分层提供了更可靠的木材体积信息,但在此过程中牺牲了结构信息。
Deconstructing the timber volume paradigm in management of the Tongass National Forest.
Caouette, John P.; Kramer, Marc G.; Nowacki, Gregory J. 2000. Deconstructing the timber volume paradigm in management of the Tongass National Forest. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-482. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 20 p. (Shaw, Charles G., III, tech. coord.; Conservation and resource assesments for the Tongass land management plan revision). Timber volume information and associated maps have been widely used in the Tongass National Forest for land-use planning and timber and wildlife management. Although considerable effort has been expended to improve timber volume maps, little has been done to evaluate the suitability of timber volume as a descriptor of forest character. We established a rough indicator of forest structure that uses trees per acre and quadratic mean diameter to examine the relation between timber volume and forest structure. Results indicated that timber volume and forest structure are not interchangeable attributes. Results also indicated that the original photinterpreted timber volume stratification did not always capture differences in timber volume but may have captured differences in forest structure. The recently revised timber volume stratification provides more reliable timber volume information, but it sacrifices structural information in the process.