数论元探究学习模式的原型设计与发展

S. D. Harahap, A. Fauzan, Ellizar, I. Arnawa
{"title":"数论元探究学习模式的原型设计与发展","authors":"S. D. Harahap, A. Fauzan, Ellizar, I. Arnawa","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.201209.184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prototype design is to assess the basic stage of research evaluation. The evaluation used follows Tessmer's evaluation steps. Aspects that are evaluated are in the form of RPS, SAP, development model books, student worksheets, lecturers' books and number theory teaching materials. The evaluation results were obtained from the researcher's own selection test and the expert's test. The results of the evaluation of the instrument by the researcher obtained an average value of 0.776 with the high category, and the results of the assessment of the instrument by the experts obtained 0.77 in the high category as well. The ICC value of all instruments obtained was 0.765 high category, meaning that the validator's level of confidence in the instrument was very high, in the development of the meta-inquiry pursuit model.","PeriodicalId":310793,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Innovation in Education (ICoIE 2020)","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prototype Design Development of Meta-Inquiry Learning Model in Number Theory\",\"authors\":\"S. D. Harahap, A. Fauzan, Ellizar, I. Arnawa\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/assehr.k.201209.184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prototype design is to assess the basic stage of research evaluation. The evaluation used follows Tessmer's evaluation steps. Aspects that are evaluated are in the form of RPS, SAP, development model books, student worksheets, lecturers' books and number theory teaching materials. The evaluation results were obtained from the researcher's own selection test and the expert's test. The results of the evaluation of the instrument by the researcher obtained an average value of 0.776 with the high category, and the results of the assessment of the instrument by the experts obtained 0.77 in the high category as well. The ICC value of all instruments obtained was 0.765 high category, meaning that the validator's level of confidence in the instrument was very high, in the development of the meta-inquiry pursuit model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":310793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Innovation in Education (ICoIE 2020)\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Innovation in Education (ICoIE 2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Innovation in Education (ICoIE 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原型设计是评估研究的基本阶段。使用的评估遵循Tessmer的评估步骤。评估的方面以RPS, SAP,开发模型书籍,学生工作表,讲师书籍和数论教材的形式进行。评价结果由研究者自己的选择测试和专家的测试得出。研究者对仪器的评价结果在高类别中平均为0.776,专家对仪器的评价结果在高类别中平均为0.77。获得的所有工具的ICC值为0.765高类别,这意味着在元查询追求模型的开发中,验证者对该工具的信心水平非常高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prototype Design Development of Meta-Inquiry Learning Model in Number Theory
Prototype design is to assess the basic stage of research evaluation. The evaluation used follows Tessmer's evaluation steps. Aspects that are evaluated are in the form of RPS, SAP, development model books, student worksheets, lecturers' books and number theory teaching materials. The evaluation results were obtained from the researcher's own selection test and the expert's test. The results of the evaluation of the instrument by the researcher obtained an average value of 0.776 with the high category, and the results of the assessment of the instrument by the experts obtained 0.77 in the high category as well. The ICC value of all instruments obtained was 0.765 high category, meaning that the validator's level of confidence in the instrument was very high, in the development of the meta-inquiry pursuit model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信