学科潜能与个体选择:来自瓦哈卡州跨文化教育参与性研究的思考

IF 0.7 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Matthew Lebrato
{"title":"学科潜能与个体选择:来自瓦哈卡州跨文化教育参与性研究的思考","authors":"Matthew Lebrato","doi":"10.1111/napa.12149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article reflects on the current status of participatory research in anthropology. I draw on my work at the Instituto Superior Intercultural Ayuuk (Ayuuk Intercultural University) in Oaxaca, Mexico to sketch some of potentials and pitfalls for participatory research during the preliminary, data-collection, and postfield phases. My argument is that while anthropologists <i>as individuals</i> tend to find ways to connect meaningfully with collaborators in the field, the discipline does little to train, foster, or evaluate participatory research as a core element. Assigning participatory research to the status of a personal choice rather than a disciplinary hallmark saps anthropology's potential for meaningful engagement with a host of publics, not the least of which are the communities, groups, and networks of individuals with whom we conduct research. [decolonization, intercultural education, Latin America, participatory research, training and methods]</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/napa.12149","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disciplinary Potential and Individual Choice: Reflections from Participatory Research on Oaxacan Intercultural Education\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Lebrato\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/napa.12149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article reflects on the current status of participatory research in anthropology. I draw on my work at the Instituto Superior Intercultural Ayuuk (Ayuuk Intercultural University) in Oaxaca, Mexico to sketch some of potentials and pitfalls for participatory research during the preliminary, data-collection, and postfield phases. My argument is that while anthropologists <i>as individuals</i> tend to find ways to connect meaningfully with collaborators in the field, the discipline does little to train, foster, or evaluate participatory research as a core element. Assigning participatory research to the status of a personal choice rather than a disciplinary hallmark saps anthropology's potential for meaningful engagement with a host of publics, not the least of which are the communities, groups, and networks of individuals with whom we conduct research. [decolonization, intercultural education, Latin America, participatory research, training and methods]</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Anthropological Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/napa.12149\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Anthropological Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.12149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.12149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对参与式人类学研究的现状进行了反思。我利用我在墨西哥瓦哈卡州的阿尤克高等跨文化大学(阿尤克跨文化大学)的工作,概述了参与性研究在初步、数据收集和后期阶段的一些潜力和缺陷。我的观点是,虽然作为个体的人类学家倾向于找到与该领域合作者建立有意义联系的方法,但该学科在培训、促进或评估作为核心要素的参与性研究方面做得很少。将参与性研究赋予个人选择的地位,而不是学科标志,削弱了人类学与大量公众进行有意义接触的潜力,其中最重要的是我们进行研究的社区、团体和个人网络。[非殖民化、跨文化教育、拉丁美洲、参与性研究、培训和方法]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disciplinary Potential and Individual Choice: Reflections from Participatory Research on Oaxacan Intercultural Education

This article reflects on the current status of participatory research in anthropology. I draw on my work at the Instituto Superior Intercultural Ayuuk (Ayuuk Intercultural University) in Oaxaca, Mexico to sketch some of potentials and pitfalls for participatory research during the preliminary, data-collection, and postfield phases. My argument is that while anthropologists as individuals tend to find ways to connect meaningfully with collaborators in the field, the discipline does little to train, foster, or evaluate participatory research as a core element. Assigning participatory research to the status of a personal choice rather than a disciplinary hallmark saps anthropology's potential for meaningful engagement with a host of publics, not the least of which are the communities, groups, and networks of individuals with whom we conduct research. [decolonization, intercultural education, Latin America, participatory research, training and methods]

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信