为什么大学溢价没有到处上涨?就业保护和在职技能投资

Matthias Doepke, Ruben Gaetani
{"title":"为什么大学溢价没有到处上涨?就业保护和在职技能投资","authors":"Matthias Doepke, Ruben Gaetani","doi":"10.3386/w27331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why has the college wage premium risen rapidly in the United States since the 1980s, but not in European economies such as Germany? We argue that differences in employment protection can account for much of the gap. We develop a model in which firms and workers make relationship-specific investments in skill accumulation. The incentive to invest is stronger when employment protection creates an expectation of long-lasting matches. We argue that changes in the economic environment have reduced relationship-specific investment for less-educated workers in the United States, but not for better-protected workers in Germany.","PeriodicalId":403294,"journal":{"name":"CEPR: Macroeconomics & Growth (Topic)","volume":"281 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Didn't the College Premium Rise Everywhere? Employment Protection and On-the-Job Investment in Skills\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Doepke, Ruben Gaetani\",\"doi\":\"10.3386/w27331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Why has the college wage premium risen rapidly in the United States since the 1980s, but not in European economies such as Germany? We argue that differences in employment protection can account for much of the gap. We develop a model in which firms and workers make relationship-specific investments in skill accumulation. The incentive to invest is stronger when employment protection creates an expectation of long-lasting matches. We argue that changes in the economic environment have reduced relationship-specific investment for less-educated workers in the United States, but not for better-protected workers in Germany.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CEPR: Macroeconomics & Growth (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"281 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CEPR: Macroeconomics & Growth (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3386/w27331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEPR: Macroeconomics & Growth (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/w27331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

为什么自20世纪80年代以来,美国大学毕业生的工资溢价迅速上升,而德国等欧洲经济体却没有?我们认为,就业保护方面的差异可以解释这一差距的大部分原因。我们开发了一个模型,在这个模型中,企业和工人在技能积累方面进行关系特定的投资。当就业保护创造出一种长期匹配的预期时,投资的动机就会更强。我们认为,经济环境的变化减少了美国受教育程度较低的工人对特定关系的投资,但没有减少德国受保护程度较高的工人的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Didn't the College Premium Rise Everywhere? Employment Protection and On-the-Job Investment in Skills
Why has the college wage premium risen rapidly in the United States since the 1980s, but not in European economies such as Germany? We argue that differences in employment protection can account for much of the gap. We develop a model in which firms and workers make relationship-specific investments in skill accumulation. The incentive to invest is stronger when employment protection creates an expectation of long-lasting matches. We argue that changes in the economic environment have reduced relationship-specific investment for less-educated workers in the United States, but not for better-protected workers in Germany.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信