儿童感染性休克的主要结局指标:系统评价

Ferianis Setiawati, Anis Prima Dewi
{"title":"儿童感染性休克的主要结局指标:系统评价","authors":"Ferianis Setiawati, Anis Prima Dewi","doi":"10.53555/nnmhs.v9i8.1817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Sepsis is a major cause of mortality in pediatric populations, with 22 cases per 100,000 live births in infants and 2,202 cases per 100,000 live births in neonates, causing an annual burden of 1.2 million cases. There is currently no consensus regarding the most appropriate to measure the primary outcome of pediatric septic shock. \nObjective: The aim of this study was to determine the primary outcome that should be assessed in pediatric patients who experience sepsis shock \nMethods: Based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), we searched literature from several databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science) following PRISMA guidelines. The following keywords are used: ((Primary) AND (Outcome) AND (Measure) OR (Indicator) AND (Pediatric) OR (Childern) AND (Septic) AND (Shock)). Manual searches are also conducted to get relevant articles that meet the mentioned criteria. Data were extracted based on author, year, study design, sample size, results and discussion. \nResults: In this systematic review, we found a total of five studies, with three types of prospective studies and two retrospective studies. A total of 5.164 cases were involved in the study, with a range years 2014 to 2023. Of the five studies, all discussed that mortality was the primary outcome measured in pediatric patients with septic shock. Other indicators that can be measured as outcomes in patients are length of hospitalization, clearance from lactic acid, and occurrence of multiple organ disfunction. \nConclusion: In pediatric patients with sepsis shock there are several primary outcomes that can be assessed. Some literature suggests that mortality is a major outcome to be considered.","PeriodicalId":347955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advance Research in Medical & Health Science (ISSN: 2208-2425)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES IN PEDIATRIC SEPTIC SHOCK: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW\",\"authors\":\"Ferianis Setiawati, Anis Prima Dewi\",\"doi\":\"10.53555/nnmhs.v9i8.1817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Sepsis is a major cause of mortality in pediatric populations, with 22 cases per 100,000 live births in infants and 2,202 cases per 100,000 live births in neonates, causing an annual burden of 1.2 million cases. There is currently no consensus regarding the most appropriate to measure the primary outcome of pediatric septic shock. \\nObjective: The aim of this study was to determine the primary outcome that should be assessed in pediatric patients who experience sepsis shock \\nMethods: Based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), we searched literature from several databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science) following PRISMA guidelines. The following keywords are used: ((Primary) AND (Outcome) AND (Measure) OR (Indicator) AND (Pediatric) OR (Childern) AND (Septic) AND (Shock)). Manual searches are also conducted to get relevant articles that meet the mentioned criteria. Data were extracted based on author, year, study design, sample size, results and discussion. \\nResults: In this systematic review, we found a total of five studies, with three types of prospective studies and two retrospective studies. A total of 5.164 cases were involved in the study, with a range years 2014 to 2023. Of the five studies, all discussed that mortality was the primary outcome measured in pediatric patients with septic shock. Other indicators that can be measured as outcomes in patients are length of hospitalization, clearance from lactic acid, and occurrence of multiple organ disfunction. \\nConclusion: In pediatric patients with sepsis shock there are several primary outcomes that can be assessed. Some literature suggests that mortality is a major outcome to be considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advance Research in Medical & Health Science (ISSN: 2208-2425)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advance Research in Medical & Health Science (ISSN: 2208-2425)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53555/nnmhs.v9i8.1817\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advance Research in Medical & Health Science (ISSN: 2208-2425)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53555/nnmhs.v9i8.1817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:败血症是儿科人群死亡的主要原因,每10万活产婴儿中有22例,每10万活产新生儿中有2202例,每年造成120万病例的负担。目前对于衡量儿童感染性休克主要结局的最合适方法尚无共识。目的:本研究的目的是确定发生脓毒症休克的儿科患者应该评估的主要结局方法:基于系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)的首选报告项目,我们根据PRISMA指南从几个数据库(PubMed, ScienceDirect和Web of Science)检索文献。使用以下关键词:(主要)和(结果)和(测量)或(指标)和(儿科)或(儿童)和(感染性疾病)和(休克)。人工搜索也会进行,以获得符合上述标准的相关文章。数据根据作者、年份、研究设计、样本量、结果和讨论进行提取。结果:本系统综述共纳入5项研究,其中前瞻性研究3项,回顾性研究2项。研究共涉及5.164例病例,时间范围为2014年至2023年。在这五项研究中,所有研究都讨论了死亡率是衡量小儿感染性休克患者的主要结果。其他可以衡量患者预后的指标包括住院时间、乳酸清除和多器官功能障碍的发生。结论:在儿童脓毒症休克患者中,有几个主要结局可以评估。一些文献表明,死亡率是一个需要考虑的主要结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES IN PEDIATRIC SEPTIC SHOCK: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Introduction: Sepsis is a major cause of mortality in pediatric populations, with 22 cases per 100,000 live births in infants and 2,202 cases per 100,000 live births in neonates, causing an annual burden of 1.2 million cases. There is currently no consensus regarding the most appropriate to measure the primary outcome of pediatric septic shock. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the primary outcome that should be assessed in pediatric patients who experience sepsis shock Methods: Based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), we searched literature from several databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science) following PRISMA guidelines. The following keywords are used: ((Primary) AND (Outcome) AND (Measure) OR (Indicator) AND (Pediatric) OR (Childern) AND (Septic) AND (Shock)). Manual searches are also conducted to get relevant articles that meet the mentioned criteria. Data were extracted based on author, year, study design, sample size, results and discussion. Results: In this systematic review, we found a total of five studies, with three types of prospective studies and two retrospective studies. A total of 5.164 cases were involved in the study, with a range years 2014 to 2023. Of the five studies, all discussed that mortality was the primary outcome measured in pediatric patients with septic shock. Other indicators that can be measured as outcomes in patients are length of hospitalization, clearance from lactic acid, and occurrence of multiple organ disfunction. Conclusion: In pediatric patients with sepsis shock there are several primary outcomes that can be assessed. Some literature suggests that mortality is a major outcome to be considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信