上新世-更新世及其早期的不稳定巴阡山脉和跨喀尔巴阡山脉地貌演化

Y. Kravchuk, V. Chalyk
{"title":"上新世-更新世及其早期的不稳定巴阡山脉和跨喀尔巴阡山脉地貌演化","authors":"Y. Kravchuk, V. Chalyk","doi":"10.30970/gpc.2019.1.2808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Sarmatian-Pannonian and Pontian-Pliocene stages are most important in the landform evolution of the Inner Precarpathians and Solotvyn basin. Due to the intense elevations in the upper Miocene, the Precarpathian Sea was pushed to the east and northeast. On the land freed from the sea, a hydrographic network was created, and rivers moved along the retreating sea in Northeast and Southeast directions. Original river valleys were of diagonal and inline outflow directions unlike modern transverse valleys.\nThe Pontian-Pliocene is associated with the final phase of Carpathian and Precarpathian tectogenesis, and the proof is the undisturbed Pliocene denudation surface (Hofstein, 1985) or the upper denudation level (Teisseyre, 1933).\nThe Solotvyno basin had continental regime before the Mukachevo basin had, so the Solotvyno basin got denudation and denudation-accumulative surfaces formed. These include the oldest denudation “Kichersky Level” researched by H. Alferyev (1948), which is believed to date to the early Pannonian.\nYounger denudation and denudation-accumulative surfaces are consistent with the Precarpathian and Transcarpathian regions. In the Precarpathian region, most authors distinguished two denudation-accumulative surfaces (terraces) – Krasna and Loyeva, and in the Transcarpathian, three – Dilotska, Boronyavska and Shardynska.\nIn the Precarpathian region, they first identified pediments (Kravchuk, 1971), dating back to the Pliocene – early Pleistocene. Subsequently, I. Hofstein suggested that they should be dated the late Pliocene by analogy with the Transcarpathian pediments of Ye. Mazur (1963), but he did not deny that their formation continued in the Pleistocene.\nThe prolonged weakening of the elevation in the early Pleistocene led to the predominance of lateral erosion, expansion of valley bottoms, and intense erosion of ancient terraces (denudation-accumulating surfaces).\nThe analysis of terrace complexes in the Precarpathians and Transcarpathians makes it possible to determine the average heights of the Pliocene-Pleistocene elevations, which confirms the synchronicity of the landform evolution in these regions.\nKey words: denudation and denudation-accumulative surfaces; terraces; pediments; Pliocene-Pleistocene elevation; Precarpathians; Transcarpathians.","PeriodicalId":374629,"journal":{"name":"PROBLEMS OF GEOMORPHOLOGY AND PALEOGEOGRAPHY OF THE UKRANIAN CARPATHIANS AND ADJACENT AREAS","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRECARPATHIAN AND TRANSCARPATHIAN LANDFORM EVOLUTION IN THE PLIOCENE-PLEOSTOCENE AND AT EARLY STAGES\",\"authors\":\"Y. Kravchuk, V. Chalyk\",\"doi\":\"10.30970/gpc.2019.1.2808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Sarmatian-Pannonian and Pontian-Pliocene stages are most important in the landform evolution of the Inner Precarpathians and Solotvyn basin. Due to the intense elevations in the upper Miocene, the Precarpathian Sea was pushed to the east and northeast. On the land freed from the sea, a hydrographic network was created, and rivers moved along the retreating sea in Northeast and Southeast directions. Original river valleys were of diagonal and inline outflow directions unlike modern transverse valleys.\\nThe Pontian-Pliocene is associated with the final phase of Carpathian and Precarpathian tectogenesis, and the proof is the undisturbed Pliocene denudation surface (Hofstein, 1985) or the upper denudation level (Teisseyre, 1933).\\nThe Solotvyno basin had continental regime before the Mukachevo basin had, so the Solotvyno basin got denudation and denudation-accumulative surfaces formed. These include the oldest denudation “Kichersky Level” researched by H. Alferyev (1948), which is believed to date to the early Pannonian.\\nYounger denudation and denudation-accumulative surfaces are consistent with the Precarpathian and Transcarpathian regions. In the Precarpathian region, most authors distinguished two denudation-accumulative surfaces (terraces) – Krasna and Loyeva, and in the Transcarpathian, three – Dilotska, Boronyavska and Shardynska.\\nIn the Precarpathian region, they first identified pediments (Kravchuk, 1971), dating back to the Pliocene – early Pleistocene. Subsequently, I. Hofstein suggested that they should be dated the late Pliocene by analogy with the Transcarpathian pediments of Ye. Mazur (1963), but he did not deny that their formation continued in the Pleistocene.\\nThe prolonged weakening of the elevation in the early Pleistocene led to the predominance of lateral erosion, expansion of valley bottoms, and intense erosion of ancient terraces (denudation-accumulating surfaces).\\nThe analysis of terrace complexes in the Precarpathians and Transcarpathians makes it possible to determine the average heights of the Pliocene-Pleistocene elevations, which confirms the synchronicity of the landform evolution in these regions.\\nKey words: denudation and denudation-accumulative surfaces; terraces; pediments; Pliocene-Pleistocene elevation; Precarpathians; Transcarpathians.\",\"PeriodicalId\":374629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PROBLEMS OF GEOMORPHOLOGY AND PALEOGEOGRAPHY OF THE UKRANIAN CARPATHIANS AND ADJACENT AREAS\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PROBLEMS OF GEOMORPHOLOGY AND PALEOGEOGRAPHY OF THE UKRANIAN CARPATHIANS AND ADJACENT AREAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30970/gpc.2019.1.2808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROBLEMS OF GEOMORPHOLOGY AND PALEOGEOGRAPHY OF THE UKRANIAN CARPATHIANS AND ADJACENT AREAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30970/gpc.2019.1.2808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

萨尔马提亚—潘诺尼亚期和庞蒂亚—上新世期是内不稳定巴阡山脉和索洛维恩盆地地貌演化的重要阶段。由于中新世上部的强烈抬升,不稳定巴阡海被推到了东部和东北部。在脱离海洋的陆地上,形成了水文网,河流沿着后退的海洋在东北和东南方向流动。与现代的横向河谷不同,原始河谷的流出方向为对角线和直线。pontian -上新世与喀尔巴阡山脉和不稳定巴阡山脉构造作用的最后阶段有关,证据是未受干扰的上新世剥蚀面(Hofstein, 1985)或上层剥蚀层(Teisseyre, 1933)。在穆卡切沃盆地之前,索洛维诺盆地已经形成了陆相制度,因此索洛维诺盆地形成了剥蚀面和剥蚀积积面。其中包括H. Alferyev(1948)研究的最古老的剥蚀“基切尔斯基层”,据信可以追溯到潘诺尼亚早期。较年轻的剥蚀面和剥蚀堆积面与不稳定巴阡和跨喀尔巴阡地区一致。在不稳定巴阡地区,大多数作者区分了两个剥蚀堆积面(阶地)——克拉斯纳和洛耶娃,在外喀尔巴阡地区,区分了三个剥蚀堆积面(阶地)——Dilotska、Boronyavska和Shardynska。在Precarpathian地区,他们首次发现了山墙(Kravchuk, 1971),其历史可以追溯到上新世-更新世早期。随后,I. Hofstein建议将它们与叶氏的外喀尔巴阡山墙类比为上新世晚期。Mazur(1963),但他不否认它们在更新世继续形成。早更新世高程的长期减弱导致了横向侵蚀的优势,河谷底部的扩张和古梯田(剥蚀-积聚面)的强烈侵蚀。通过对不稳定巴阡山脉和外喀尔巴阡山脉阶地复体的分析,可以确定上新世-更新世海拔的平均高度,从而证实了这些地区地貌演化的同步性。关键词:剥蚀与剥蚀积面;梯田;山形墙;上新世更新世高程;Precarpathians;喀尔巴阡山脉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PRECARPATHIAN AND TRANSCARPATHIAN LANDFORM EVOLUTION IN THE PLIOCENE-PLEOSTOCENE AND AT EARLY STAGES
The Sarmatian-Pannonian and Pontian-Pliocene stages are most important in the landform evolution of the Inner Precarpathians and Solotvyn basin. Due to the intense elevations in the upper Miocene, the Precarpathian Sea was pushed to the east and northeast. On the land freed from the sea, a hydrographic network was created, and rivers moved along the retreating sea in Northeast and Southeast directions. Original river valleys were of diagonal and inline outflow directions unlike modern transverse valleys. The Pontian-Pliocene is associated with the final phase of Carpathian and Precarpathian tectogenesis, and the proof is the undisturbed Pliocene denudation surface (Hofstein, 1985) or the upper denudation level (Teisseyre, 1933). The Solotvyno basin had continental regime before the Mukachevo basin had, so the Solotvyno basin got denudation and denudation-accumulative surfaces formed. These include the oldest denudation “Kichersky Level” researched by H. Alferyev (1948), which is believed to date to the early Pannonian. Younger denudation and denudation-accumulative surfaces are consistent with the Precarpathian and Transcarpathian regions. In the Precarpathian region, most authors distinguished two denudation-accumulative surfaces (terraces) – Krasna and Loyeva, and in the Transcarpathian, three – Dilotska, Boronyavska and Shardynska. In the Precarpathian region, they first identified pediments (Kravchuk, 1971), dating back to the Pliocene – early Pleistocene. Subsequently, I. Hofstein suggested that they should be dated the late Pliocene by analogy with the Transcarpathian pediments of Ye. Mazur (1963), but he did not deny that their formation continued in the Pleistocene. The prolonged weakening of the elevation in the early Pleistocene led to the predominance of lateral erosion, expansion of valley bottoms, and intense erosion of ancient terraces (denudation-accumulating surfaces). The analysis of terrace complexes in the Precarpathians and Transcarpathians makes it possible to determine the average heights of the Pliocene-Pleistocene elevations, which confirms the synchronicity of the landform evolution in these regions. Key words: denudation and denudation-accumulative surfaces; terraces; pediments; Pliocene-Pleistocene elevation; Precarpathians; Transcarpathians.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信