第二次Artsakh战争后阿塞拜疆的强制文化占有政策。Dadivank的案例

H. Martirosyan
{"title":"第二次Artsakh战争后阿塞拜疆的强制文化占有政策。Dadivank的案例","authors":"H. Martirosyan","doi":"10.51442/ijags.0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the methods of the continuing forced appropriation of Armenian cultural monuments in Artsakh by the Republic of Azerbaijan’s functionaries after the Second Artsakh War. The “Albanisation” of Armenian cultural monuments in Mountainous Karabakh in the scientific field began in the 1950s, when it was imperative to reinforce the Azerbaijani people’s cultural identity, based on the foundations laid between 1920 and 1930 and to try to make all the peoples living in the southern Caucasus equally indigenous to the region. One of the “victims” of the “Albanisation” of the cultural heritage of the Armenians of Mountainous Karabakh is the monastic complex of Dadivank, located in the Karvachar area of the Shahumyan region. Passing under Azerbaijani jurisdiction in November 2020, it was presented to the international community as part of the historic-cultural heritage of the descendants of the Caucasian Albanians, which should be under the jurisdiction of Udis and Azerbaijanis. With this aim in view, the Azerbaijani leadership instituted the policy of forced appropriation and alienation of Armenian heritage from the Armenian culture through various means, which will be shown in detail below. This article will also demonstrate how the theory of “Albanisation” began and developed in Azerbaijan SSR historiography and what “scientific bases” were – and are - being brought forward during the soviet and post-soviet eras by historians to present Dadivank as Albanian. It will also reveal the directions Azerbaijan is following for the appropriation of Armenian cultural legacy, rebranding it as Albanian, and foisting this theory on the international public.","PeriodicalId":200042,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Azerbaijan’s Policy of Forced Cultural Appropriation after the Second Artsakh War. Case of Dadivank\",\"authors\":\"H. Martirosyan\",\"doi\":\"10.51442/ijags.0035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article presents the methods of the continuing forced appropriation of Armenian cultural monuments in Artsakh by the Republic of Azerbaijan’s functionaries after the Second Artsakh War. The “Albanisation” of Armenian cultural monuments in Mountainous Karabakh in the scientific field began in the 1950s, when it was imperative to reinforce the Azerbaijani people’s cultural identity, based on the foundations laid between 1920 and 1930 and to try to make all the peoples living in the southern Caucasus equally indigenous to the region. One of the “victims” of the “Albanisation” of the cultural heritage of the Armenians of Mountainous Karabakh is the monastic complex of Dadivank, located in the Karvachar area of the Shahumyan region. Passing under Azerbaijani jurisdiction in November 2020, it was presented to the international community as part of the historic-cultural heritage of the descendants of the Caucasian Albanians, which should be under the jurisdiction of Udis and Azerbaijanis. With this aim in view, the Azerbaijani leadership instituted the policy of forced appropriation and alienation of Armenian heritage from the Armenian culture through various means, which will be shown in detail below. This article will also demonstrate how the theory of “Albanisation” began and developed in Azerbaijan SSR historiography and what “scientific bases” were – and are - being brought forward during the soviet and post-soviet eras by historians to present Dadivank as Albanian. It will also reveal the directions Azerbaijan is following for the appropriation of Armenian cultural legacy, rebranding it as Albanian, and foisting this theory on the international public.\",\"PeriodicalId\":200042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51442/ijags.0035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51442/ijags.0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章介绍了阿塞拜疆共和国的工作人员在第二次阿特萨克战争后继续强行占用阿特萨克境内的亚美尼亚文化古迹的方法。卡拉巴赫山区的亚美尼亚文化纪念物在科学领域的“阿尔巴尼亚化”始于1950年代,当时必须在1920年至1930年奠定的基础上加强阿塞拜疆人民的文化特性,并努力使居住在南高加索地区的所有人民都同样是该地区的土著居民。卡拉巴赫山区亚美尼亚人文化遗产“阿尔巴尼亚化”的“受害者”之一是位于Shahumyan地区Karvachar地区的Dadivank修道院建筑群。它于2020年11月由阿塞拜疆管辖,作为高加索阿尔巴尼亚人后裔的历史文化遗产的一部分提交给国际社会,应由乌迪斯和阿塞拜疆人管辖。为此目的,阿塞拜疆领导人制定了一项政策,通过各种手段强行侵占亚美尼亚遗产并使其脱离亚美尼亚文化,下文将详细说明这一点。本文还将展示“阿尔巴尼亚化”理论是如何在阿塞拜疆苏维埃社会主义共和国史学中开始和发展的,以及在苏联和后苏联时期,历史学家们提出了什么“科学依据”来将Dadivank描述为阿尔巴尼亚人。它还将揭示阿塞拜疆在挪用亚美尼亚文化遗产方面所遵循的方向,将其重新命名为阿尔巴尼亚文化遗产,并将这一理论强加给国际公众。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Azerbaijan’s Policy of Forced Cultural Appropriation after the Second Artsakh War. Case of Dadivank
The article presents the methods of the continuing forced appropriation of Armenian cultural monuments in Artsakh by the Republic of Azerbaijan’s functionaries after the Second Artsakh War. The “Albanisation” of Armenian cultural monuments in Mountainous Karabakh in the scientific field began in the 1950s, when it was imperative to reinforce the Azerbaijani people’s cultural identity, based on the foundations laid between 1920 and 1930 and to try to make all the peoples living in the southern Caucasus equally indigenous to the region. One of the “victims” of the “Albanisation” of the cultural heritage of the Armenians of Mountainous Karabakh is the monastic complex of Dadivank, located in the Karvachar area of the Shahumyan region. Passing under Azerbaijani jurisdiction in November 2020, it was presented to the international community as part of the historic-cultural heritage of the descendants of the Caucasian Albanians, which should be under the jurisdiction of Udis and Azerbaijanis. With this aim in view, the Azerbaijani leadership instituted the policy of forced appropriation and alienation of Armenian heritage from the Armenian culture through various means, which will be shown in detail below. This article will also demonstrate how the theory of “Albanisation” began and developed in Azerbaijan SSR historiography and what “scientific bases” were – and are - being brought forward during the soviet and post-soviet eras by historians to present Dadivank as Albanian. It will also reveal the directions Azerbaijan is following for the appropriation of Armenian cultural legacy, rebranding it as Albanian, and foisting this theory on the international public.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信