常见成像关节软骨病理学的磁共振成像-关节镜相关性:叙述性综述

Ian Savage-Elliott , Andrew J. Hughes , Jairo Triana , Zachary I. Li , Michael J. Alaia , Erin F. Alaia
{"title":"常见成像关节软骨病理学的磁共振成像-关节镜相关性:叙述性综述","authors":"Ian Savage-Elliott ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Hughes ,&nbsp;Jairo Triana ,&nbsp;Zachary I. Li ,&nbsp;Michael J. Alaia ,&nbsp;Erin F. Alaia","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjp.2023.100154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accurate preoperative assessment of chondral pathology is crucial for the diagnosis and subsequent management of articular cartilage defects. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the mainstay for articular cartilage evaluation, defect characterization, and long-term monitoring of surgical outcomes. In the absence of direct arthroscopic imaging, MRI serves as the most accurate modality for the assessment of cartilage defects. Recent studies have focused on the discrepancies in diagnostic findings, which may arise when comparing MRI and arthroscopic imaging. This review focuses on describing the differences between MRI and arthroscopic imaging findings in relation to cartilage injury. It also highlights the current understanding of normal cartilage histology, methods of cartilage defect evaluation, and expands on joint-specific considerations of the commonly imaged articulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254523000604/pdfft?md5=2fcce909a58b6c2b888acd2c05f83d5c&pid=1-s2.0-S2667254523000604-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging-arthroscopy correlation for chondral pathology in commonly imaged joints: a narrative review\",\"authors\":\"Ian Savage-Elliott ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Hughes ,&nbsp;Jairo Triana ,&nbsp;Zachary I. Li ,&nbsp;Michael J. Alaia ,&nbsp;Erin F. Alaia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjp.2023.100154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Accurate preoperative assessment of chondral pathology is crucial for the diagnosis and subsequent management of articular cartilage defects. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the mainstay for articular cartilage evaluation, defect characterization, and long-term monitoring of surgical outcomes. In the absence of direct arthroscopic imaging, MRI serves as the most accurate modality for the assessment of cartilage defects. Recent studies have focused on the discrepancies in diagnostic findings, which may arise when comparing MRI and arthroscopic imaging. This review focuses on describing the differences between MRI and arthroscopic imaging findings in relation to cartilage injury. It also highlights the current understanding of normal cartilage histology, methods of cartilage defect evaluation, and expands on joint-specific considerations of the commonly imaged articulations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254523000604/pdfft?md5=2fcce909a58b6c2b888acd2c05f83d5c&pid=1-s2.0-S2667254523000604-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254523000604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254523000604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

术前对软骨病理的准确评估对于关节软骨缺损的诊断和后续治疗至关重要。磁共振成像(MRI)是关节软骨评估、缺损特征描述和手术效果长期监测的主要手段。在没有直接关节镜成像的情况下,核磁共振成像是评估软骨缺损最准确的方法。最近的研究主要集中在核磁共振成像和关节镜成像比较时可能出现的诊断结果差异。本综述将重点描述核磁共振成像和关节镜成像在软骨损伤方面的差异。它还强调了目前对正常软骨组织学的理解、软骨缺损的评估方法,并对常见成像关节的特定关节考虑因素进行了阐述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Magnetic resonance imaging-arthroscopy correlation for chondral pathology in commonly imaged joints: a narrative review

Accurate preoperative assessment of chondral pathology is crucial for the diagnosis and subsequent management of articular cartilage defects. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the mainstay for articular cartilage evaluation, defect characterization, and long-term monitoring of surgical outcomes. In the absence of direct arthroscopic imaging, MRI serves as the most accurate modality for the assessment of cartilage defects. Recent studies have focused on the discrepancies in diagnostic findings, which may arise when comparing MRI and arthroscopic imaging. This review focuses on describing the differences between MRI and arthroscopic imaging findings in relation to cartilage injury. It also highlights the current understanding of normal cartilage histology, methods of cartilage defect evaluation, and expands on joint-specific considerations of the commonly imaged articulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信