基于颜色直方图和不变矩的蜡染图案分类中SVM和BPNN方法的比较

Wiwiet Herulambang, M. Hamidah, Fardanto Setyatama
{"title":"基于颜色直方图和不变矩的蜡染图案分类中SVM和BPNN方法的比较","authors":"Wiwiet Herulambang, M. Hamidah, Fardanto Setyatama","doi":"10.1109/ICoSTA48221.2020.1570615583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, various types and patterns of batik in Indonesia have been widely documented. Nevertheless, there are many obstacles in classifying batik's data, because the classification of batik has not been based on standard types of motifs. In this research, classification of batik's motif patterns based on color histograms and invariant moments was carried out. For the batik's pattern recognition method, two methods are tested and compared, namely the Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN) method, and the Support Vector Machine (SVM) method. The speed of the pattern recognition process of batiks' motif using SVM method requires an average processing time of 0.77 milliseconds, while the BPNN method requires an average time of 3.59 milliseconds. The accuracy of the classification of batik's pattern test data using the SVM method has an accuracy of 88.33 percent, while the BPNN method has an accuracy of 76.25 percent. The development of this research can be done by improving methods and variations in image data of batik's motif pattern.","PeriodicalId":375166,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Smart Technology and Applications (ICoSTA)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of SVM And BPNN Methods in The Classification of Batik Patterns Based on Color Histograms And Invariant Moments\",\"authors\":\"Wiwiet Herulambang, M. Hamidah, Fardanto Setyatama\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICoSTA48221.2020.1570615583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, various types and patterns of batik in Indonesia have been widely documented. Nevertheless, there are many obstacles in classifying batik's data, because the classification of batik has not been based on standard types of motifs. In this research, classification of batik's motif patterns based on color histograms and invariant moments was carried out. For the batik's pattern recognition method, two methods are tested and compared, namely the Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN) method, and the Support Vector Machine (SVM) method. The speed of the pattern recognition process of batiks' motif using SVM method requires an average processing time of 0.77 milliseconds, while the BPNN method requires an average time of 3.59 milliseconds. The accuracy of the classification of batik's pattern test data using the SVM method has an accuracy of 88.33 percent, while the BPNN method has an accuracy of 76.25 percent. The development of this research can be done by improving methods and variations in image data of batik's motif pattern.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 International Conference on Smart Technology and Applications (ICoSTA)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 International Conference on Smart Technology and Applications (ICoSTA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoSTA48221.2020.1570615583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Smart Technology and Applications (ICoSTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoSTA48221.2020.1570615583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目前,印度尼西亚蜡染的各种类型和图案已被广泛记载。然而,在蜡染的数据分类有许多障碍,因为蜡染的分类并不是基于标准类型的图案。本研究基于颜色直方图和不变矩对蜡染图案进行分类。针对蜡染的模式识别方法,测试并比较了两种方法,即反向传播神经网络(BPNN)方法和支持向量机(SVM)方法。支持向量机方法对蜡染图案识别的平均处理时间为0.77毫秒,而bp神经网络方法的平均处理时间为3.59毫秒。使用SVM方法对蜡染图案测试数据进行分类的准确率为88.33%,而BPNN方法的准确率为76.25%。该研究的发展可以通过改进蜡染图案图像数据的方法和变化来完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of SVM And BPNN Methods in The Classification of Batik Patterns Based on Color Histograms And Invariant Moments
Currently, various types and patterns of batik in Indonesia have been widely documented. Nevertheless, there are many obstacles in classifying batik's data, because the classification of batik has not been based on standard types of motifs. In this research, classification of batik's motif patterns based on color histograms and invariant moments was carried out. For the batik's pattern recognition method, two methods are tested and compared, namely the Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN) method, and the Support Vector Machine (SVM) method. The speed of the pattern recognition process of batiks' motif using SVM method requires an average processing time of 0.77 milliseconds, while the BPNN method requires an average time of 3.59 milliseconds. The accuracy of the classification of batik's pattern test data using the SVM method has an accuracy of 88.33 percent, while the BPNN method has an accuracy of 76.25 percent. The development of this research can be done by improving methods and variations in image data of batik's motif pattern.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信