电磁场屏蔽效能、反射和吸收的实测数据与仿真数据的比较

M. Pavlík, A. Gladyr, J. Zbojovský
{"title":"电磁场屏蔽效能、反射和吸收的实测数据与仿真数据的比较","authors":"M. Pavlík, A. Gladyr, J. Zbojovský","doi":"10.1109/PAEP49887.2020.9240895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the comparison of shielding efficiency, the reflection of electromagnetic field absorption. Measured data from the anechoic chamber and simulation data from the HFSS program were used as comparison data. The measured object was a brick wall. The results were compared in the frequency range from 1 GHz to 9 GHz. The result of this research is a comparison of the results and finding out how these results are different. The results show that the difference between the measured and simulated results is 5 – 25 percent. The highest differences were in the frequency range from 5 GHz to 9 GHz. The purpose of the article was to determine whether the HFSS program is suitable for these simulations.","PeriodicalId":240191,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Problems of Automated Electrodrive. Theory and Practice (PAEP)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Measured and Simulated Data of Shielding Effectiveness, Reflection and Absorption of Electromagnetic Field\",\"authors\":\"M. Pavlík, A. Gladyr, J. Zbojovský\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PAEP49887.2020.9240895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with the comparison of shielding efficiency, the reflection of electromagnetic field absorption. Measured data from the anechoic chamber and simulation data from the HFSS program were used as comparison data. The measured object was a brick wall. The results were compared in the frequency range from 1 GHz to 9 GHz. The result of this research is a comparison of the results and finding out how these results are different. The results show that the difference between the measured and simulated results is 5 – 25 percent. The highest differences were in the frequency range from 5 GHz to 9 GHz. The purpose of the article was to determine whether the HFSS program is suitable for these simulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":240191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE Problems of Automated Electrodrive. Theory and Practice (PAEP)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE Problems of Automated Electrodrive. Theory and Practice (PAEP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PAEP49887.2020.9240895\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Problems of Automated Electrodrive. Theory and Practice (PAEP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PAEP49887.2020.9240895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文对屏蔽效率、电磁场吸收反射进行了比较。消声室的测量数据和HFSS程序的模拟数据作为比较数据。被测量的对象是一堵砖墙。结果在1 GHz到9 GHz的频率范围内进行了比较。这项研究的结果是对结果的比较,并找出这些结果的不同之处。结果表明,实测值与模拟值相差5 ~ 25%。最大的差异是在5 GHz到9 GHz的频率范围内。本文的目的是确定HFSS程序是否适合这些模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Measured and Simulated Data of Shielding Effectiveness, Reflection and Absorption of Electromagnetic Field
This paper deals with the comparison of shielding efficiency, the reflection of electromagnetic field absorption. Measured data from the anechoic chamber and simulation data from the HFSS program were used as comparison data. The measured object was a brick wall. The results were compared in the frequency range from 1 GHz to 9 GHz. The result of this research is a comparison of the results and finding out how these results are different. The results show that the difference between the measured and simulated results is 5 – 25 percent. The highest differences were in the frequency range from 5 GHz to 9 GHz. The purpose of the article was to determine whether the HFSS program is suitable for these simulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信