Zoran Marcov
{"title":"Pistoale balcanice cu cremene din colecţia Muzeului Banatului Timișoara / Flint Balkan Pistols from the Collection of Banat Museum in Timișoara","authors":"Zoran Marcov","doi":"10.55201/scdp2489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The craft of portable flint-lock firearms has been developed in the Balkan area under the influence of OttomanTurks. The military needs made the Ottomans to support the start up and development of the weaponryproduction related crafts in the Balkan Peninsula. The armorers, who came from the East together with theOttoman army, were part of the janissary troops, the latter being the ones who taught the local craftsmen the secretof manufacturing such weapons.Most of the Balkan flint-lock pistols used an exterior spring-based arming mechanism, also referred to asmiquelet, as Spanish mechanism, or a Turkish mechanism, depending on the context it was used on most orientalC rearms. During the same period, the western C rearms were based on an interior spring-based arming mechanism(the spring was incorporated within the mechanism), also referred to as the French mechanism, developed andenhanced by the French armorers around 1630. The French mechanism was used in the Balkan area especiallyduring the 19th century for the kubura flintlock pistols.The consolidation of the Ottoman authority in the Balkan area led to important changes in respect to the wayof life of the autochthon Christian population. In many towns from Kosovo and Metohija, Bosnia, Herzegovina,Montenegro, Macedonia, Northern Albania, Serbia, Bulgaria and Greece, the weaponry workshop productionwas significantly developed, during the 17th, 18th and especially in the 19th centuries. In the aforementionedcenters, the firearms were manufactured both for the local needs and for their trading in other provinces inthe Ottoman Empire. The weaponry workshops had been increasingly developed, especially in the peripheralpashaliks of the Ottoman Empire (Bosnia and Herzegovina), but also in the territories where the Ottomanauthority had been weakened and the anarchy danger had been as real as possible (Northern Albania). In theBalkan workshops, where the flintlock firearms were manufactured, both the barrels and the actual mechanismswere initially imported from Northern Italy. In time, especially in the 19th century, the autochthon armorersmanaged to manufacture the barrels (Prizren, Fojnica) and the flintlock mechanisms (Constantinople) locally,giving thus a particularity to the firearms of the late phase of the Empire.The pistol is a portable firearm, perfect for relatively short distance fights. The name of a pistol was closelyrelated to the place of manufacture and also to the materials used for its manufacture and decoration. The flintlockpistols were characterized by downwards grips, having long bulbs ended with a metallic button. The flintlockmechanism usually used was a Spanish mechanism also referred to as miquelet.Traditionally, the pistol was often referred to as kubura. The flintlock kubura was characterized by a downwardsgrip, with a massive metallic bulb and French type flintlock mechanism and an interior cock-spring. The kuburterm is a Turkish word, widely used in the Balkans, generally standing for a cavalry pistol. These types of firearmsare usually given the name of the manufacturing place. The widely spread kubura in the Balkanic area was thekubura pećanka, manufactured by the famous workshop from Peć (Metohija).Among the flintlock Balkan pistols, we should remind ledenica, considered to be the most elegant and luxuriousBalkan pistol in the 18th–19th centuries and the Albanian pistol of Elbasan, known under the name of „Rat Tail”.Referring to these firearms, besides kubura pećanka from the Balkan Peninsula, we should mention that otherkubure were manufactured at Foča (Eastern Herzegovina) or Shkodra (Northern Albania), both types being wellknownfor their rich ornaments made of silver and precious stones.The firearms collection from the Banat Museum in Timişoara holds three flintlock pistols and ten flintlockkubure manufactured in the Balkan workshops. Considering the sub-grouping classification, these firearms areclassified as follows: two fiintlock pistols belonging to Elbasan type (Central Albania), a Shkodra type flintlock pistol(Northern Albania), eight Peć flintlock kubure (Metohija) and two Foča flintlock kubure (Eastern Herzegovina).With a view to the age determination of the 13 exponents of the Banat Museum collection, they are datedbetween the mid 18th century (the Albanian pistols) and the mid 19th century (one of the flintlock pistol – namelythe Foča type).Considering the origin of the pistols’ components and the manner in which these became part of theaforementioned collection, things are not by far as simple as they seem to be at first sight. Most of the items thatare currently part of firearms collection the Banat Museum collection entered the institution’s inventory in thepre-war period, being a part of the old museum’s collection (the inventory of the Museum Society of History andArcheology – SMIA of Banat). In respect to the pre-war period, the Banat Museum of Timişoara archive keepsboth the SMIA inventory book and the old archive of the society, but the problem regarding the identificationof the components derives from the lack of clear correspondence between the old documents of the MuseumSociety and the present evidences from the Banat Museum of Timişoara, which were last reconstructed duringthe post-war period. Considering that most of the items that are part of the firearms collection had no pre-warinventory number and the lack of the interwar records (at least until to this date), the identification of both theitems and donors can be made only based on descriptions in the donation documents (The Historical Archiveof the Banat Museum in Timişoara). In this case, regarding the flintlock Balkan pistols, the identification of thedonors is practically impossible within the context in which the archive documents offer important informationsconnected to the donor and the historical context, but the effective descriptions of the components are most ofthe time too brief.However, after a careful analysis of the SMIA evidences, there was found that most of the Balkan origin itemsderive from the Bosnian area, representing donations of former Austro-Hungarian military participants to thefights for Bosnian pacification in 1878. Related to the Balkan pistols, considering the data provided by the firstinventory register of the Banat Museum, we can suggest the hypothesis according to which the 13 items are typicalto the Balkan workshops and especially contemporary to the yataghans and arnautka rifles, derive from Bosnia,being war captures which have been subsequently donated the museum. Since no data is available until this date,this will remain only a possible hypothesis.Instead of conclusions, we should mention the fact that during the 18th–19th centuries, numerous copies afterthe North–Italian pistols have been made in the Balkan Peninsula (especially Peć) or the western pistols have beenenhanced by being decorated in a Balkan manner (having added a wide silver plate on barrels, silver incrustationon grips etc.). The Balkan area was also known for its artisan workshops which manufactured the so-called „pistolsfor the poor”. All these items are also found in the Banat Museum’s collection, and they make a special group offirearms, which will be assessed in a future study.","PeriodicalId":442932,"journal":{"name":"Analele Banatului XIX 2011","volume":"57 38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analele Banatului XIX 2011","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55201/scdp2489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在奥斯曼土耳其人的影响下,巴尔干地区发展了便携式燧发火器工艺。军事需求使得奥斯曼人支持在巴尔干半岛启动和发展与武器生产相关的工艺。这些与奥斯曼军队一起来自东方的装甲师是禁卫军的一部分,后者负责向当地工匠传授制造武器的秘诀。大多数巴尔干燧发手枪使用外部弹簧武装机构,也被称为asmiquelet,西班牙机构或土耳其机构,这取决于它在大多数东方武器上使用的背景。在同一时期,西方的C型武器是基于内部弹簧的武装机构(弹簧被合并在机构内),也被称为法国机构,由法国装甲师在1630年左右开发和改进。在巴尔干地区,特别是在19世纪的kubura燧发手枪上,法国的机械装置被使用。奥斯曼帝国在巴尔干地区的权威得到巩固,导致当地基督徒的生活方式发生了重大变化。在科索沃和梅托希亚、波斯尼亚、黑塞哥维那、黑山、马其顿、阿尔巴尼亚北部、塞尔维亚、保加利亚和希腊的许多城镇,武器车间的生产在17世纪、18世纪,特别是在19世纪得到了显著的发展。在上述中心,枪支的制造既是为了当地的需要,也是为了在奥斯曼帝国的其他省份进行贸易。武器车间日益发展,特别是在奥斯曼帝国的外围地区(波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那),但也在奥斯曼当局被削弱和无政府状态危险尽可能真实的领土(阿尔巴尼亚北部)。在生产燧发枪的巴尔干工厂里,枪管和实际装置最初都是从意大利北部进口的。随着时间的推移,特别是在19世纪,本土装甲制造商设法在当地制造枪管(普里兹伦,福伊尼察)和燧发枪装置(君士坦丁堡),从而使帝国后期的火器具有特殊性。手枪是一种便携式武器,非常适合短距离战斗。手枪的名称与制造地点以及制造和装饰所用的材料密切相关。燧发手枪的特点是握把向下,枪管长,末端有一个金属纽扣。通常使用的燧发枪机构是一种西班牙机构,也被称为燧发枪。传统上,手枪通常被称为kubura。kubura燧发枪的特点是向下握把,带有一个巨大的金属球和法国式燧发枪机构和一个内部旋塞弹簧。kuburterm是一个土耳其词,在巴尔干地区广泛使用,通常指骑兵手枪。这些类型的枪支通常以制造地点命名。在巴尔干地区广泛传播的kubura是kubura pećanka,由peki (Metohija)著名的车间制造。在巴尔干燧发手枪中,我们应该提醒一下ledenica,它被认为是18 - 19世纪最优雅、最豪华的巴尔干手枪,以及被称为“鼠尾”的爱尔巴桑阿尔巴尼亚手枪。关于这些火器,除了产自巴尔干半岛的kubura pećanka外,我们应该提到在fo<e:1> a(东黑塞哥维那)或Shkodra(北阿尔巴尼亚)制造的其他kubura,这两种类型都以其由银和宝石制成的丰富装饰而闻名。timi<e:1> oara巴纳特博物馆的火器收藏品中有三支燧发手枪和十支燧发枪,是在巴尔干车间制造的。考虑到分组分类,这些火器的分类如下:两支燧发手枪属于爱尔巴桑式(阿尔巴尼亚中部),一支斯库德拉式燧发手枪(阿尔巴尼亚北部),八支佩克燧发库布尔(梅托希亚)和两支fo<e:1>燧发库布尔(黑塞哥维那东部)。根据巴纳特博物馆收藏的13支手枪的年代测定,它们的年代介于18世纪中期(阿尔巴尼亚手枪)和19世纪中期(燧发手枪之一,即fo<e:1> a型)之间。考虑到手枪部件的起源以及这些部件成为上述收藏品一部分的方式,事情远不像乍一看那么简单。目前属于巴纳特博物馆枪支收藏的大部分物品都是在战前时期进入该机构的库存,作为旧博物馆收藏的一部分(巴纳特博物馆历史与考古协会- SMIA的库存)。 关于战前时期,巴纳特博物馆的timi<e:1>档案馆保存了SMIA库存书和社会的旧档案,但关于鉴定组成部分的问题源于博物馆协会的旧文件与巴纳特博物馆的timi<e:1>档案馆的现有证据之间缺乏明确的对应关系,这些证据是在战后重建的。考虑到作为枪支收藏一部分的大多数物品没有战前库存编号,也缺乏两次世界大战之间的记录(至少到目前为止),物品和捐赠者的身份识别只能根据捐赠文件中的描述(timi<e:1> oara的Banat博物馆历史档案)。在这种情况下,关于巴尔干燧发手枪,在档案文件提供了与捐赠者和历史背景相关的重要信息的背景下,捐赠者的身份识别实际上是不可能的,但是对组件的有效描述大多数时候都太简短了。然而,经过对SMIA证据的仔细分析,发现大多数巴尔干起源的物品来自波斯尼亚地区,代表了1878年前奥匈帝国军事参与者对波斯尼亚和平战争的捐赠。关于巴尔干手枪,考虑到巴纳特博物馆第一次库存登记册提供的数据,我们可以提出一个假设,根据这个假设,13件物品是巴尔干车间的典型物品,特别是与yataghan和arnautka步枪同时代的物品,它们来自波斯尼亚,是后来捐赠给博物馆的战争战利品。由于在此日期之前没有可用的数据,这将仍然只是一个可能的假设。除了结论,我们应该提到这样一个事实,即在18 - 19世纪,巴尔干半岛(特别是佩斯克)生产了许多北意大利手枪的复制品,或者西方手枪通过巴尔干风格的装饰(在枪管上增加了宽银盘,握把上镀银等)得到了加强。巴尔干地区也因其工匠作坊而闻名,这些作坊制造所谓的“穷人手枪”。所有这些物品也在巴纳特博物馆的收藏中找到,它们构成了一个特殊的武器组,将在未来的研究中进行评估。 关于战前时期,巴纳特博物馆的timi<e:1>档案馆保存了SMIA库存书和社会的旧档案,但关于鉴定组成部分的问题源于博物馆协会的旧文件与巴纳特博物馆的timi<e:1>档案馆的现有证据之间缺乏明确的对应关系,这些证据是在战后重建的。考虑到作为枪支收藏一部分的大多数物品没有战前库存编号,也缺乏两次世界大战之间的记录(至少到目前为止),物品和捐赠者的身份识别只能根据捐赠文件中的描述(timi<e:1> oara的Banat博物馆历史档案)。在这种情况下,关于巴尔干燧发手枪,在档案文件提供了与捐赠者和历史背景相关的重要信息的背景下,捐赠者的身份识别实际上是不可能的,但是对组件的有效描述大多数时候都太简短了。然而,经过对SMIA证据的仔细分析,发现大多数巴尔干起源的物品来自波斯尼亚地区,代表了1878年前奥匈帝国军事参与者对波斯尼亚和平战争的捐赠。关于巴尔干手枪,考虑到巴纳特博物馆第一次库存登记册提供的数据,我们可以提出一个假设,根据这个假设,13件物品是巴尔干车间的典型物品,特别是与yataghan和arnautka步枪同时代的物品,它们来自波斯尼亚,是后来捐赠给博物馆的战争战利品。由于在此日期之前没有可用的数据,这将仍然只是一个可能的假设。除了结论,我们应该提到这样一个事实,即在18 - 19世纪,巴尔干半岛(特别是佩斯克)生产了许多北意大利手枪的复制品,或者西方手枪通过巴尔干风格的装饰(在枪管上增加了宽银盘,握把上镀银等)得到了加强。巴尔干地区也因其工匠作坊而闻名,这些作坊制造所谓的“穷人手枪”。所有这些物品也在巴纳特博物馆的收藏中找到,它们构成了一个特殊的武器组,将在未来的研究中进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pistoale balcanice cu cremene din colecţia Muzeului Banatului Timișoara / Flint Balkan Pistols from the Collection of Banat Museum in Timișoara
The craft of portable flint-lock firearms has been developed in the Balkan area under the influence of OttomanTurks. The military needs made the Ottomans to support the start up and development of the weaponryproduction related crafts in the Balkan Peninsula. The armorers, who came from the East together with theOttoman army, were part of the janissary troops, the latter being the ones who taught the local craftsmen the secretof manufacturing such weapons.Most of the Balkan flint-lock pistols used an exterior spring-based arming mechanism, also referred to asmiquelet, as Spanish mechanism, or a Turkish mechanism, depending on the context it was used on most orientalC rearms. During the same period, the western C rearms were based on an interior spring-based arming mechanism(the spring was incorporated within the mechanism), also referred to as the French mechanism, developed andenhanced by the French armorers around 1630. The French mechanism was used in the Balkan area especiallyduring the 19th century for the kubura flintlock pistols.The consolidation of the Ottoman authority in the Balkan area led to important changes in respect to the wayof life of the autochthon Christian population. In many towns from Kosovo and Metohija, Bosnia, Herzegovina,Montenegro, Macedonia, Northern Albania, Serbia, Bulgaria and Greece, the weaponry workshop productionwas significantly developed, during the 17th, 18th and especially in the 19th centuries. In the aforementionedcenters, the firearms were manufactured both for the local needs and for their trading in other provinces inthe Ottoman Empire. The weaponry workshops had been increasingly developed, especially in the peripheralpashaliks of the Ottoman Empire (Bosnia and Herzegovina), but also in the territories where the Ottomanauthority had been weakened and the anarchy danger had been as real as possible (Northern Albania). In theBalkan workshops, where the flintlock firearms were manufactured, both the barrels and the actual mechanismswere initially imported from Northern Italy. In time, especially in the 19th century, the autochthon armorersmanaged to manufacture the barrels (Prizren, Fojnica) and the flintlock mechanisms (Constantinople) locally,giving thus a particularity to the firearms of the late phase of the Empire.The pistol is a portable firearm, perfect for relatively short distance fights. The name of a pistol was closelyrelated to the place of manufacture and also to the materials used for its manufacture and decoration. The flintlockpistols were characterized by downwards grips, having long bulbs ended with a metallic button. The flintlockmechanism usually used was a Spanish mechanism also referred to as miquelet.Traditionally, the pistol was often referred to as kubura. The flintlock kubura was characterized by a downwardsgrip, with a massive metallic bulb and French type flintlock mechanism and an interior cock-spring. The kuburterm is a Turkish word, widely used in the Balkans, generally standing for a cavalry pistol. These types of firearmsare usually given the name of the manufacturing place. The widely spread kubura in the Balkanic area was thekubura pećanka, manufactured by the famous workshop from Peć (Metohija).Among the flintlock Balkan pistols, we should remind ledenica, considered to be the most elegant and luxuriousBalkan pistol in the 18th–19th centuries and the Albanian pistol of Elbasan, known under the name of „Rat Tail”.Referring to these firearms, besides kubura pećanka from the Balkan Peninsula, we should mention that otherkubure were manufactured at Foča (Eastern Herzegovina) or Shkodra (Northern Albania), both types being wellknownfor their rich ornaments made of silver and precious stones.The firearms collection from the Banat Museum in Timişoara holds three flintlock pistols and ten flintlockkubure manufactured in the Balkan workshops. Considering the sub-grouping classification, these firearms areclassified as follows: two fiintlock pistols belonging to Elbasan type (Central Albania), a Shkodra type flintlock pistol(Northern Albania), eight Peć flintlock kubure (Metohija) and two Foča flintlock kubure (Eastern Herzegovina).With a view to the age determination of the 13 exponents of the Banat Museum collection, they are datedbetween the mid 18th century (the Albanian pistols) and the mid 19th century (one of the flintlock pistol – namelythe Foča type).Considering the origin of the pistols’ components and the manner in which these became part of theaforementioned collection, things are not by far as simple as they seem to be at first sight. Most of the items thatare currently part of firearms collection the Banat Museum collection entered the institution’s inventory in thepre-war period, being a part of the old museum’s collection (the inventory of the Museum Society of History andArcheology – SMIA of Banat). In respect to the pre-war period, the Banat Museum of Timişoara archive keepsboth the SMIA inventory book and the old archive of the society, but the problem regarding the identificationof the components derives from the lack of clear correspondence between the old documents of the MuseumSociety and the present evidences from the Banat Museum of Timişoara, which were last reconstructed duringthe post-war period. Considering that most of the items that are part of the firearms collection had no pre-warinventory number and the lack of the interwar records (at least until to this date), the identification of both theitems and donors can be made only based on descriptions in the donation documents (The Historical Archiveof the Banat Museum in Timişoara). In this case, regarding the flintlock Balkan pistols, the identification of thedonors is practically impossible within the context in which the archive documents offer important informationsconnected to the donor and the historical context, but the effective descriptions of the components are most ofthe time too brief.However, after a careful analysis of the SMIA evidences, there was found that most of the Balkan origin itemsderive from the Bosnian area, representing donations of former Austro-Hungarian military participants to thefights for Bosnian pacification in 1878. Related to the Balkan pistols, considering the data provided by the firstinventory register of the Banat Museum, we can suggest the hypothesis according to which the 13 items are typicalto the Balkan workshops and especially contemporary to the yataghans and arnautka rifles, derive from Bosnia,being war captures which have been subsequently donated the museum. Since no data is available until this date,this will remain only a possible hypothesis.Instead of conclusions, we should mention the fact that during the 18th–19th centuries, numerous copies afterthe North–Italian pistols have been made in the Balkan Peninsula (especially Peć) or the western pistols have beenenhanced by being decorated in a Balkan manner (having added a wide silver plate on barrels, silver incrustationon grips etc.). The Balkan area was also known for its artisan workshops which manufactured the so-called „pistolsfor the poor”. All these items are also found in the Banat Museum’s collection, and they make a special group offirearms, which will be assessed in a future study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信