软件未使用功率的安全性和可靠性分析

P. Rodríguez-Dapena
{"title":"软件未使用功率的安全性和可靠性分析","authors":"P. Rodríguez-Dapena","doi":"10.1109/METROAEROSPACE.2017.7999546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many domains, when software controls or implements safety critical functionalities, software safety and dependability analyses are needed in order to understand how it may fail, the consequences of these failures and how to avoid or mitigate these failures. But from experience in different projects, when these analyses are performed at the software level, they are not used to their maximum extent: they are always late and their content is often incomplete (just to justify the already assigned criticality level). They are not always considered as bringing safety and dependability requirements into the project. Existing techniques may be used along all software development and used for many different purposes to support the definition, verification and demonstration of software related safety and dependability characteristics. Therefore the questions are: When are these analyses required? Why are they so difficult to be performed? How are they finally used and why in such a limited way so far? This paper will analyze when these analyses are required, what for, which ones are required by ECSS and evaluate how to better use them in Space projects.","PeriodicalId":229414,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace)","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The unused power of SW safety&dependability analyses\",\"authors\":\"P. Rodríguez-Dapena\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/METROAEROSPACE.2017.7999546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In many domains, when software controls or implements safety critical functionalities, software safety and dependability analyses are needed in order to understand how it may fail, the consequences of these failures and how to avoid or mitigate these failures. But from experience in different projects, when these analyses are performed at the software level, they are not used to their maximum extent: they are always late and their content is often incomplete (just to justify the already assigned criticality level). They are not always considered as bringing safety and dependability requirements into the project. Existing techniques may be used along all software development and used for many different purposes to support the definition, verification and demonstration of software related safety and dependability characteristics. Therefore the questions are: When are these analyses required? Why are they so difficult to be performed? How are they finally used and why in such a limited way so far? This paper will analyze when these analyses are required, what for, which ones are required by ECSS and evaluate how to better use them in Space projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace)\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/METROAEROSPACE.2017.7999546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/METROAEROSPACE.2017.7999546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多领域中,当软件控制或实现安全关键功能时,需要进行软件安全性和可靠性分析,以便了解它如何可能失败、这些失败的后果以及如何避免或减轻这些失败。但是从不同项目的经验来看,当这些分析在软件级别执行时,它们并没有被最大程度地使用:它们总是很晚,而且它们的内容通常是不完整的(只是为了证明已经分配的临界级别)。它们并不总是被认为将安全性和可靠性要求带入项目。现有的技术可以在所有软件开发中使用,并用于许多不同的目的,以支持与软件相关的安全性和可靠性特征的定义、验证和演示。因此问题是:什么时候需要这些分析?为什么它们这么难表演?它们最终是如何使用的,为什么到目前为止使用的方式如此有限?本文将分析何时需要这些分析,用于什么目的,ECSS需要哪些分析,并评估如何更好地在空间项目中使用它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The unused power of SW safety&dependability analyses
In many domains, when software controls or implements safety critical functionalities, software safety and dependability analyses are needed in order to understand how it may fail, the consequences of these failures and how to avoid or mitigate these failures. But from experience in different projects, when these analyses are performed at the software level, they are not used to their maximum extent: they are always late and their content is often incomplete (just to justify the already assigned criticality level). They are not always considered as bringing safety and dependability requirements into the project. Existing techniques may be used along all software development and used for many different purposes to support the definition, verification and demonstration of software related safety and dependability characteristics. Therefore the questions are: When are these analyses required? Why are they so difficult to be performed? How are they finally used and why in such a limited way so far? This paper will analyze when these analyses are required, what for, which ones are required by ECSS and evaluate how to better use them in Space projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信