Al-Ghazali和Jean Piaget的认知发展概念

Yahya Ad
{"title":"Al-Ghazali和Jean Piaget的认知发展概念","authors":"Yahya Ad","doi":"10.24042/kons.v5i2.3501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The equation of cognitive development (reason) according to Al-Ghazali and Jean Piaget is found at the stages of development which are divided into four stages. In addition, the views of the two figures also have a relationship or meeting point found in the aspects of the ability of each stage that is passed in each process of cognitive development (reason). Differences in cognitive development (reason) according to Al-Ghazali and Jean Piaget are found in the methodology as the basis of both thoughts. the research method used is a philosophical comparative method, so the systematic discussion follows the following patterns or stages: 1) describes the concept of each character, 2) displays each concept, then compares it, 3) looks for and finds distinctive characteristics, including the similarities and differences of each of the two thoughts, and 4) conducting a critical evaluation of these two thoughts. Al-Ghazali based his thinking on ratios derived from revelation while Jean Piaget laid his rationale on pure ratios. In addition, there are also differences in the views of both of them in the use of the term, Al-Ghazali uses the term sense while Jean Piaget uses the term cognitive.","PeriodicalId":346882,"journal":{"name":"KONSELI: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling (E-Journal)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Konsep Perkembangan Kognitif Perspektif Al-Ghazali Dan Jean Piaget\",\"authors\":\"Yahya Ad\",\"doi\":\"10.24042/kons.v5i2.3501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The equation of cognitive development (reason) according to Al-Ghazali and Jean Piaget is found at the stages of development which are divided into four stages. In addition, the views of the two figures also have a relationship or meeting point found in the aspects of the ability of each stage that is passed in each process of cognitive development (reason). Differences in cognitive development (reason) according to Al-Ghazali and Jean Piaget are found in the methodology as the basis of both thoughts. the research method used is a philosophical comparative method, so the systematic discussion follows the following patterns or stages: 1) describes the concept of each character, 2) displays each concept, then compares it, 3) looks for and finds distinctive characteristics, including the similarities and differences of each of the two thoughts, and 4) conducting a critical evaluation of these two thoughts. Al-Ghazali based his thinking on ratios derived from revelation while Jean Piaget laid his rationale on pure ratios. In addition, there are also differences in the views of both of them in the use of the term, Al-Ghazali uses the term sense while Jean Piaget uses the term cognitive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KONSELI: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling (E-Journal)\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KONSELI: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling (E-Journal)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24042/kons.v5i2.3501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KONSELI: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling (E-Journal)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/kons.v5i2.3501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

根据Al-Ghazali和Jean Piaget的理论,认知发展(理性)的方程式是在发展阶段中发现的,发展阶段分为四个阶段。此外,这两个人物的观点在每个认知发展过程(理性)中所经过的每个阶段的能力方面也有关系或交汇点。根据Al-Ghazali和Jean Piaget的观点,认知发展(理性)的差异体现在作为两种思想基础的方法论中。使用的研究方法是哲学比较法,因此系统的讨论遵循以下模式或阶段:1)描述每个人物的概念,2)展示每个概念,然后进行比较,3)寻找和发现鲜明的特征,包括两种思想的异同,4)对这两种思想进行批判性评价。Al-Ghazali的思想基础是来自启示的比率,而Jean Piaget的理论基础是纯粹的比率。此外,在术语的使用上,两人的观点也存在差异,Al-Ghazali使用“感觉”一词,而Jean Piaget使用“认知”一词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Konsep Perkembangan Kognitif Perspektif Al-Ghazali Dan Jean Piaget
The equation of cognitive development (reason) according to Al-Ghazali and Jean Piaget is found at the stages of development which are divided into four stages. In addition, the views of the two figures also have a relationship or meeting point found in the aspects of the ability of each stage that is passed in each process of cognitive development (reason). Differences in cognitive development (reason) according to Al-Ghazali and Jean Piaget are found in the methodology as the basis of both thoughts. the research method used is a philosophical comparative method, so the systematic discussion follows the following patterns or stages: 1) describes the concept of each character, 2) displays each concept, then compares it, 3) looks for and finds distinctive characteristics, including the similarities and differences of each of the two thoughts, and 4) conducting a critical evaluation of these two thoughts. Al-Ghazali based his thinking on ratios derived from revelation while Jean Piaget laid his rationale on pure ratios. In addition, there are also differences in the views of both of them in the use of the term, Al-Ghazali uses the term sense while Jean Piaget uses the term cognitive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信