PID、LQR和MPC在直流电机调速中的性能评价

Siddhesh Dani, D. Sonawane, Deepak D. Ingole, S. Patil
{"title":"PID、LQR和MPC在直流电机调速中的性能评价","authors":"Siddhesh Dani, D. Sonawane, Deepak D. Ingole, S. Patil","doi":"10.1109/I2CT.2017.8226149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electrical drives play an important role in the implementation of tasks for increasing productivity in various industries, for automation and complex mechanization of production processes. In this paper three strategies; a classical Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID), a Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) and a Model Predictive Control (MPC) are designed and implemented for the DC motor speed control. All these strategies are compared on the basis of output response, steady state error, controller efforts, and constraints handling for the reference tracking. Performed simulations shows that though the controller efforts are less in PID and LQR but MPC outperforms for reference tracking and constraints handling.","PeriodicalId":343232,"journal":{"name":"2017 2nd International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of PID, LQR and MPC for DC motor speed control\",\"authors\":\"Siddhesh Dani, D. Sonawane, Deepak D. Ingole, S. Patil\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/I2CT.2017.8226149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electrical drives play an important role in the implementation of tasks for increasing productivity in various industries, for automation and complex mechanization of production processes. In this paper three strategies; a classical Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID), a Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) and a Model Predictive Control (MPC) are designed and implemented for the DC motor speed control. All these strategies are compared on the basis of output response, steady state error, controller efforts, and constraints handling for the reference tracking. Performed simulations shows that though the controller efforts are less in PID and LQR but MPC outperforms for reference tracking and constraints handling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 2nd International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 2nd International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/I2CT.2017.8226149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 2nd International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/I2CT.2017.8226149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

电气驱动在执行任务中发挥着重要的作用,以提高各个行业的生产力,自动化和复杂的机械化生产过程。本文提出了三种策略;设计并实现了经典的比例-积分-导数(PID)、线性二次型调节器(LQR)和模型预测控制(MPC)对直流电机的速度控制。在输出响应、稳态误差、控制器努力和参考跟踪约束处理的基础上,对所有这些策略进行了比较。仿真结果表明,虽然PID和LQR的控制器工作较少,但MPC在参考跟踪和约束处理方面优于PID和LQR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of PID, LQR and MPC for DC motor speed control
Electrical drives play an important role in the implementation of tasks for increasing productivity in various industries, for automation and complex mechanization of production processes. In this paper three strategies; a classical Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID), a Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) and a Model Predictive Control (MPC) are designed and implemented for the DC motor speed control. All these strategies are compared on the basis of output response, steady state error, controller efforts, and constraints handling for the reference tracking. Performed simulations shows that though the controller efforts are less in PID and LQR but MPC outperforms for reference tracking and constraints handling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信