SPICE, CMM, iso9000和BOOTSTRAP的定量评价

Y. Wang, I. Court, M. Ross, G. Staples, G. King, A. Dorling
{"title":"SPICE, CMM, iso9000和BOOTSTRAP的定量评价","authors":"Y. Wang, I. Court, M. Ross, G. Staples, G. King, A. Dorling","doi":"10.1109/SESS.1997.595565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper comparatively analyses the current models for software process assessment and improvement (SPA/SPI) e.g., SPICE, CMM, ISO 9000 and BOOTSTRAP. The configuration of the sample spaces and the partially overlapped fundamental process activities defined in the four models are quantitatively analysed and contrasted. The features, orientation, profile and correlation in the software process capability determination frameworks of the current models are comparatively evaluated. The analysis results provide the software development organisations with a complete and objective view of the strengths, weaknesses and interrelationships of these four SPA/SPI models, so the most appropriate models can be chosen for their crucial long-term SPA/SPI pursuit.","PeriodicalId":345428,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Software Engineering Standards","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative evaluation of the SPICE, CMM, ISO 9000 and BOOTSTRAP\",\"authors\":\"Y. Wang, I. Court, M. Ross, G. Staples, G. King, A. Dorling\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SESS.1997.595565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper comparatively analyses the current models for software process assessment and improvement (SPA/SPI) e.g., SPICE, CMM, ISO 9000 and BOOTSTRAP. The configuration of the sample spaces and the partially overlapped fundamental process activities defined in the four models are quantitatively analysed and contrasted. The features, orientation, profile and correlation in the software process capability determination frameworks of the current models are comparatively evaluated. The analysis results provide the software development organisations with a complete and objective view of the strengths, weaknesses and interrelationships of these four SPA/SPI models, so the most appropriate models can be chosen for their crucial long-term SPA/SPI pursuit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Software Engineering Standards\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Software Engineering Standards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SESS.1997.595565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Software Engineering Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SESS.1997.595565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

本文比较分析了现有的软件过程评价与改进(SPA/SPI)模型,如SPICE、CMM、iso9000和BOOTSTRAP。对四个模型中定义的样本空间的结构和部分重叠的基本过程活动进行了定量分析和对比。比较评价了现有模型在软件过程能力确定框架中的特点、定位、轮廓和相关性。分析结果为软件开发组织提供了对这四种SPA/SPI模型的优点、缺点和相互关系的完整和客观的看法,因此可以为他们关键的长期SPA/SPI追求选择最合适的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative evaluation of the SPICE, CMM, ISO 9000 and BOOTSTRAP
This paper comparatively analyses the current models for software process assessment and improvement (SPA/SPI) e.g., SPICE, CMM, ISO 9000 and BOOTSTRAP. The configuration of the sample spaces and the partially overlapped fundamental process activities defined in the four models are quantitatively analysed and contrasted. The features, orientation, profile and correlation in the software process capability determination frameworks of the current models are comparatively evaluated. The analysis results provide the software development organisations with a complete and objective view of the strengths, weaknesses and interrelationships of these four SPA/SPI models, so the most appropriate models can be chosen for their crucial long-term SPA/SPI pursuit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信