对美洲土著部落的赔偿?

Jeff Rasley
{"title":"对美洲土著部落的赔偿?","authors":"Jeff Rasley","doi":"10.1353/wic.2020.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The article reviews the political arguments for and against reparations for African Americans and Native Americans and concludes that certain arguments against reparations for African Americans do not apply to the issue of reparations for Native Americans. Because Native nations are \"domestic dependent nations\" under US and international law, they have unique legal standing to request reparations from the US and state governments. And, because a bureaucratic structure already exists within the federal government to negotiate with Native nations and tribes, and the nations and tribes have their own governments, certain logistical problems for paying reparations are reduced. Ethical arguments for paying reparations are described in light of the history of genocidal actions against indigenous peoples, and legal holdings and Congressional acts relevant to the issue of reparations are reviewed, most notably the \"American Rescue Plan for Native Tribes\". Finally, \"community development\" is compared to reparations as a way to make progress toward fulfilling the US's ethical obligation to Native Americans.","PeriodicalId":343767,"journal":{"name":"Wicazo Sa Review","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reparations for Native American Tribes?\",\"authors\":\"Jeff Rasley\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/wic.2020.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The article reviews the political arguments for and against reparations for African Americans and Native Americans and concludes that certain arguments against reparations for African Americans do not apply to the issue of reparations for Native Americans. Because Native nations are \\\"domestic dependent nations\\\" under US and international law, they have unique legal standing to request reparations from the US and state governments. And, because a bureaucratic structure already exists within the federal government to negotiate with Native nations and tribes, and the nations and tribes have their own governments, certain logistical problems for paying reparations are reduced. Ethical arguments for paying reparations are described in light of the history of genocidal actions against indigenous peoples, and legal holdings and Congressional acts relevant to the issue of reparations are reviewed, most notably the \\\"American Rescue Plan for Native Tribes\\\". Finally, \\\"community development\\\" is compared to reparations as a way to make progress toward fulfilling the US's ethical obligation to Native Americans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wicazo Sa Review\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wicazo Sa Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/wic.2020.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wicazo Sa Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wic.2020.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文回顾了支持和反对非裔美国人和印第安人赔偿的政治论点,并得出结论,某些反对非裔美国人赔偿的论点不适用于印第安人赔偿问题。因为根据美国和国际法,土著民族是“国内依赖国家”,他们有独特的法律地位向美国和州政府要求赔偿。而且,由于联邦政府内部已经存在与土著民族和部落谈判的官僚结构,而这些民族和部落有自己的政府,支付赔款的某些后勤问题就减少了。根据针对土著人民的种族灭绝行动的历史,叙述了支付赔款的道德理由,并审查了与赔款问题有关的法律依据和国会法案,最值得注意的是“美国土著部落救援计划”。最后,将“社区发展”与赔偿相比较,作为实现美国对印第安人的道德义务的一种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reparations for Native American Tribes?
Abstract:The article reviews the political arguments for and against reparations for African Americans and Native Americans and concludes that certain arguments against reparations for African Americans do not apply to the issue of reparations for Native Americans. Because Native nations are "domestic dependent nations" under US and international law, they have unique legal standing to request reparations from the US and state governments. And, because a bureaucratic structure already exists within the federal government to negotiate with Native nations and tribes, and the nations and tribes have their own governments, certain logistical problems for paying reparations are reduced. Ethical arguments for paying reparations are described in light of the history of genocidal actions against indigenous peoples, and legal holdings and Congressional acts relevant to the issue of reparations are reviewed, most notably the "American Rescue Plan for Native Tribes". Finally, "community development" is compared to reparations as a way to make progress toward fulfilling the US's ethical obligation to Native Americans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信