2000年以来用户体验实证研究的地理和学科考察

Proceedings of the 36th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication Pub Date : 2018-08-03 DOI:10.1145/3233756.3233930

Joy Robinson, Candice L. Lanius

{"title":"2000年以来用户体验实证研究的地理和学科考察","authors":"Joy Robinson, Candice L. Lanius","doi":"10.1145/3233756.3233930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Defining the boundaries of a discipline is important work for helping others discover new avenues of research. In this research report, we share two new dimensions from an analysis of over 400 empirical user experience (UX) studies published between 2000 and 2016. The findings of this comprehensive examination reveal patterns within the researcher's methodological choices and artifacts of study across different countries and disciplines. Our research questions were: 1) Does the researcher's region (continent) affect the method(s) or artifacts(s) studied? 2) Does the researcher's disciplinary identity impact their choice of method and sample size? This research reveals future avenues for examination and helps UX researchers consider new opportunities on the horizon.","PeriodicalId":153529,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 36th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Geographic and Disciplinary Examination of UX Empirical Research Since 2000\",\"authors\":\"Joy Robinson, Candice L. Lanius\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3233756.3233930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Defining the boundaries of a discipline is important work for helping others discover new avenues of research. In this research report, we share two new dimensions from an analysis of over 400 empirical user experience (UX) studies published between 2000 and 2016. The findings of this comprehensive examination reveal patterns within the researcher's methodological choices and artifacts of study across different countries and disciplines. Our research questions were: 1) Does the researcher's region (continent) affect the method(s) or artifacts(s) studied? 2) Does the researcher's disciplinary identity impact their choice of method and sample size? This research reveals future avenues for examination and helps UX researchers consider new opportunities on the horizon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 36th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 36th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3233756.3233930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 36th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3233756.3233930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

定义一个学科的边界对于帮助其他人发现新的研究途径是很重要的工作。在这份研究报告中，我们分享了2000年至2016年间发表的400多项经验用户体验(UX)研究的两个新维度。这项综合检查的结果揭示了研究者在不同国家和学科的研究方法选择和人工制品中的模式。我们的研究问题是:1)研究者所在的地区(大陆)是否会影响研究的方法或人工制品?2)研究者的学科身份是否会影响他们对方法和样本量的选择?这项研究揭示了未来的研究途径，并帮助用户体验研究人员考虑即将出现的新机会。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Geographic and Disciplinary Examination of UX Empirical Research Since 2000

Defining the boundaries of a discipline is important work for helping others discover new avenues of research. In this research report, we share two new dimensions from an analysis of over 400 empirical user experience (UX) studies published between 2000 and 2016. The findings of this comprehensive examination reveal patterns within the researcher's methodological choices and artifacts of study across different countries and disciplines. Our research questions were: 1) Does the researcher's region (continent) affect the method(s) or artifacts(s) studied? 2) Does the researcher's disciplinary identity impact their choice of method and sample size? This research reveals future avenues for examination and helps UX researchers consider new opportunities on the horizon.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of the 36th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication

自引率

0.00%

发文量