Graceyana Jennifer, Jenaya Adra Rumondor, Ryan Giovanni Christianto
{"title":"Kedudukan Bawaslu Dalam Menangani Perselisihan Hasil Pemilu : Persfektif Electoral Dan Constitutional Democracy","authors":"Graceyana Jennifer, Jenaya Adra Rumondor, Ryan Giovanni Christianto","doi":"10.55108/awasia.v2i1.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The large number of requests for dispute resolution of the results of the 2019 elections, which were received by the Constitutional Court and must be resolved within a limited time, has prompted the birth of a number of ideas to restructure the authority in handling disputes over election results. This paper aims to provide ideas related to Bawaslu's position in handling disputes over election results using normative legal research methods. From the electoral effectiveness, the existence of the Constitutional Court as an institution that judges disputes over election results is appropriate. Apart from being the Guardian of the Constitution, it is also in the context of checks and balances. From the effectiveness of Constitutional Democracy, that the authority of the Constitutional Court in deciding disputes over election results has not been carried out effectively and efficiently, where so far the majority of disputes over election results requested to the Constitutional Court, also contain legal problems with elections which are basically the authority of Bawaslu.","PeriodicalId":200948,"journal":{"name":"Awasia: Jurnal Pemilu dan Demokrasi","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Awasia: Jurnal Pemilu dan Demokrasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55108/awasia.v2i1.113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宪法裁判所收到了大量必须在限定时间内解决的2019年选举结果争议解决请求,因此出现了一些重新调整选举结果争议处理权限的构想。本文旨在运用规范的法律研究方法,为巴瓦斯鲁处理选举结果争议的立场提供相关思路。从选举的实效性来看,宪法法院作为选举结果争议的裁判机构的存在是恰当的。除了作为宪法的守护者,它还处于权力制衡的背景下。从宪政民主的有效性来看,宪法法院在决定选举结果争议方面的权威没有得到有效和高效的行使,迄今为止,大多数关于选举结果的争议都要求宪法法院处理,其中也包含选举方面的法律问题,而选举基本上是巴瓦斯卢的权威。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kedudukan Bawaslu Dalam Menangani Perselisihan Hasil Pemilu : Persfektif Electoral Dan Constitutional Democracy
The large number of requests for dispute resolution of the results of the 2019 elections, which were received by the Constitutional Court and must be resolved within a limited time, has prompted the birth of a number of ideas to restructure the authority in handling disputes over election results. This paper aims to provide ideas related to Bawaslu's position in handling disputes over election results using normative legal research methods. From the electoral effectiveness, the existence of the Constitutional Court as an institution that judges disputes over election results is appropriate. Apart from being the Guardian of the Constitution, it is also in the context of checks and balances. From the effectiveness of Constitutional Democracy, that the authority of the Constitutional Court in deciding disputes over election results has not been carried out effectively and efficiently, where so far the majority of disputes over election results requested to the Constitutional Court, also contain legal problems with elections which are basically the authority of Bawaslu.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信