开普敦郊区对擅自占用者的排他性言论

G. Saff
{"title":"开普敦郊区对擅自占用者的排他性言论","authors":"G. Saff","doi":"10.1177/096746080100800104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the discursive practices employed by property owners and the state to justify the exclusion of mostly black squatters from three ‘white’ suburbs in Cape Town, South Africa. In these suburbs, Noordhoek, Hout Bay and Milnerton, property owners voiced nearly identical objections to justify the exclusion of the squatters from ‘their’ neighbour-hoods. The main justifications, couched mostly in race-neutral terms, was that the squatters would increase crime, decrease property values, spread disease and despoil the natural environment. It is argued that while these discursive practices often camouflage racial prejudice, this does not explain the occurrence of similar discursive patterns in areas where race has not been a major factor. A satisfactory explanation for these discursive commonalities should thus embrace both class and racial dynamics and must be situated within the context of property relations within a capitalist land market.","PeriodicalId":104830,"journal":{"name":"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exclusionary discourse towards squatters in suburban Cape Town\",\"authors\":\"G. Saff\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/096746080100800104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the discursive practices employed by property owners and the state to justify the exclusion of mostly black squatters from three ‘white’ suburbs in Cape Town, South Africa. In these suburbs, Noordhoek, Hout Bay and Milnerton, property owners voiced nearly identical objections to justify the exclusion of the squatters from ‘their’ neighbour-hoods. The main justifications, couched mostly in race-neutral terms, was that the squatters would increase crime, decrease property values, spread disease and despoil the natural environment. It is argued that while these discursive practices often camouflage racial prejudice, this does not explain the occurrence of similar discursive patterns in areas where race has not been a major factor. A satisfactory explanation for these discursive commonalities should thus embrace both class and racial dynamics and must be situated within the context of property relations within a capitalist land market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/096746080100800104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/096746080100800104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

本文考察了南非开普敦三个“白人”郊区的业主和政府为将大部分黑人擅自占用者排除在外而采用的话语实践。在这些郊区,诺德霍克、豪特湾和米尔顿,业主们表达了几乎相同的反对意见,以证明将擅自占用者排除在“他们的”社区之外是合理的。主要的理由是,这些擅自占用者会增加犯罪,降低财产价值,传播疾病,破坏自然环境,这些理由大多是种族中立的。有人认为,虽然这些话语实践经常掩盖种族偏见,但这并不能解释在种族不是主要因素的地区出现类似话语模式的原因。因此,对这些话语共性的令人满意的解释应该包括阶级和种族动态,并且必须置于资本主义土地市场中的财产关系的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exclusionary discourse towards squatters in suburban Cape Town
This paper examines the discursive practices employed by property owners and the state to justify the exclusion of mostly black squatters from three ‘white’ suburbs in Cape Town, South Africa. In these suburbs, Noordhoek, Hout Bay and Milnerton, property owners voiced nearly identical objections to justify the exclusion of the squatters from ‘their’ neighbour-hoods. The main justifications, couched mostly in race-neutral terms, was that the squatters would increase crime, decrease property values, spread disease and despoil the natural environment. It is argued that while these discursive practices often camouflage racial prejudice, this does not explain the occurrence of similar discursive patterns in areas where race has not been a major factor. A satisfactory explanation for these discursive commonalities should thus embrace both class and racial dynamics and must be situated within the context of property relations within a capitalist land market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信