{"title":"早期的合作","authors":"Lyle Lustigman","doi":"10.1075/IL.20007.LUS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The present study examines the development of ‘but’-introduced clauses in adult-toddler conversations,\n distinguishing between autonomous productions (I wanna stay but we need to go) and adult-child\n co-constructed uses (Adult: we’re going home, Child: \n but I wanna stay). Analyses\n covered all adult and child aval ‘but’ uses in three longitudinal Hebrew corpora (age-range: 1;5–3;3), showing\n that: (1) both adults and children mostly use aval ‘but’ in co-construction rather than autonomously; (2) adults\n begin co-constructing ‘but’-clauses with children months before the children start using ‘but’, mostly by elaborating on\n single-word child productions before adding the ‘but’-clause (Child: \n cup\n , Adult:\n \n that’s a cup, but you don’t like juice); (3) as children start combining more clauses,\n adults gradually conjoin more ‘but’-clauses directly with the children’s productions, without elaboration (Child: let’s\n go. Adult: \n but first put on your shoes). These patterns suggest that the main function\n of ‘but’-clauses in adult-child discourse is co-constructing ideas contributed by two (or more) interlocutors. Such\n co-constructions are initially scaffolded by the adults, until the children are able to contribute full-fledged propositions to\n co-constructions. These findings provide further evidence of the role of adult-child interaction in introducing and familiarizing\n children with new linguistic structures, and advancing their developing grammar.","PeriodicalId":210541,"journal":{"name":"Interactional Linguistics","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early collaborations\",\"authors\":\"Lyle Lustigman\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/IL.20007.LUS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The present study examines the development of ‘but’-introduced clauses in adult-toddler conversations,\\n distinguishing between autonomous productions (I wanna stay but we need to go) and adult-child\\n co-constructed uses (Adult: we’re going home, Child: \\n but I wanna stay). Analyses\\n covered all adult and child aval ‘but’ uses in three longitudinal Hebrew corpora (age-range: 1;5–3;3), showing\\n that: (1) both adults and children mostly use aval ‘but’ in co-construction rather than autonomously; (2) adults\\n begin co-constructing ‘but’-clauses with children months before the children start using ‘but’, mostly by elaborating on\\n single-word child productions before adding the ‘but’-clause (Child: \\n cup\\n , Adult:\\n \\n that’s a cup, but you don’t like juice); (3) as children start combining more clauses,\\n adults gradually conjoin more ‘but’-clauses directly with the children’s productions, without elaboration (Child: let’s\\n go. Adult: \\n but first put on your shoes). These patterns suggest that the main function\\n of ‘but’-clauses in adult-child discourse is co-constructing ideas contributed by two (or more) interlocutors. Such\\n co-constructions are initially scaffolded by the adults, until the children are able to contribute full-fledged propositions to\\n co-constructions. These findings provide further evidence of the role of adult-child interaction in introducing and familiarizing\\n children with new linguistic structures, and advancing their developing grammar.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interactional Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interactional Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/IL.20007.LUS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactional Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/IL.20007.LUS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The present study examines the development of ‘but’-introduced clauses in adult-toddler conversations,
distinguishing between autonomous productions (I wanna stay but we need to go) and adult-child
co-constructed uses (Adult: we’re going home, Child:
but I wanna stay). Analyses
covered all adult and child aval ‘but’ uses in three longitudinal Hebrew corpora (age-range: 1;5–3;3), showing
that: (1) both adults and children mostly use aval ‘but’ in co-construction rather than autonomously; (2) adults
begin co-constructing ‘but’-clauses with children months before the children start using ‘but’, mostly by elaborating on
single-word child productions before adding the ‘but’-clause (Child:
cup
, Adult:
that’s a cup, but you don’t like juice); (3) as children start combining more clauses,
adults gradually conjoin more ‘but’-clauses directly with the children’s productions, without elaboration (Child: let’s
go. Adult:
but first put on your shoes). These patterns suggest that the main function
of ‘but’-clauses in adult-child discourse is co-constructing ideas contributed by two (or more) interlocutors. Such
co-constructions are initially scaffolded by the adults, until the children are able to contribute full-fledged propositions to
co-constructions. These findings provide further evidence of the role of adult-child interaction in introducing and familiarizing
children with new linguistic structures, and advancing their developing grammar.