MCBCG:基于模型检查的时序时钟门控

Sumit Ahuja, S. Shukla
{"title":"MCBCG:基于模型检查的时序时钟门控","authors":"Sumit Ahuja, S. Shukla","doi":"10.1109/HLDVT.2009.5340181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dynamic power reduction techniques such as sequential clock-gating aim at eliminating inconsequential computation and clock-toggles of the registers. Usually sequential clock-gating opportunities are discovered manually based on certain characteristics of a design (e.g. pipelining). Since manual addition of sequential gating circuitry might change the functionality of the design, sequential equivalence checking is needed after such changes. Tools for sequential equivalence checking are expensive, and based on recent technologies. Therefore, it is desirable to automate the discovery of sequential clock-gating opportunities using already existing and proven technologies such as model checking and thereby a priori proving that the changes will not affect the required functionality. Model Checking Based Sequential Clock Gating (MCBCG) method formally proves particular sequential dependencies of registers on other registers and logic, thus sequentially gating such registers will not require further validation. An automation scheme for MCBCG methodology is also proposed in this paper. Preliminary experiments show up to 30% more savings than the traditional (combinational) clock-gating based power reduction techniques.","PeriodicalId":153879,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop","volume":"54 96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MCBCG: Model Checking Based Sequential Clock-Gating\",\"authors\":\"Sumit Ahuja, S. Shukla\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HLDVT.2009.5340181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dynamic power reduction techniques such as sequential clock-gating aim at eliminating inconsequential computation and clock-toggles of the registers. Usually sequential clock-gating opportunities are discovered manually based on certain characteristics of a design (e.g. pipelining). Since manual addition of sequential gating circuitry might change the functionality of the design, sequential equivalence checking is needed after such changes. Tools for sequential equivalence checking are expensive, and based on recent technologies. Therefore, it is desirable to automate the discovery of sequential clock-gating opportunities using already existing and proven technologies such as model checking and thereby a priori proving that the changes will not affect the required functionality. Model Checking Based Sequential Clock Gating (MCBCG) method formally proves particular sequential dependencies of registers on other registers and logic, thus sequentially gating such registers will not require further validation. An automation scheme for MCBCG methodology is also proposed in this paper. Preliminary experiments show up to 30% more savings than the traditional (combinational) clock-gating based power reduction techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop\",\"volume\":\"54 96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2009.5340181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2009.5340181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

动态功耗降低技术,如时序时钟门控,旨在消除寄存器的无关计算和时钟切换。通常顺序时钟门控机会是基于设计的某些特征(例如流水线)手动发现的。由于手动添加顺序门控电路可能会改变设计的功能,因此在更改后需要进行顺序等效性检查。用于顺序等价性检查的工具是昂贵的,并且基于最新的技术。因此,使用已经存在的和经过验证的技术(如模型检查)自动发现顺序时钟控制机会,从而先验地证明更改不会影响所需的功能,是值得的。基于模型检查的顺序时钟门控(MCBCG)方法正式证明了寄存器对其他寄存器和逻辑的特定顺序依赖性,因此顺序门控这些寄存器将不需要进一步验证。本文还提出了MCBCG方法的自动化方案。初步实验表明,比传统的(组合)基于时钟门控的功耗降低技术节省多达30%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MCBCG: Model Checking Based Sequential Clock-Gating
Dynamic power reduction techniques such as sequential clock-gating aim at eliminating inconsequential computation and clock-toggles of the registers. Usually sequential clock-gating opportunities are discovered manually based on certain characteristics of a design (e.g. pipelining). Since manual addition of sequential gating circuitry might change the functionality of the design, sequential equivalence checking is needed after such changes. Tools for sequential equivalence checking are expensive, and based on recent technologies. Therefore, it is desirable to automate the discovery of sequential clock-gating opportunities using already existing and proven technologies such as model checking and thereby a priori proving that the changes will not affect the required functionality. Model Checking Based Sequential Clock Gating (MCBCG) method formally proves particular sequential dependencies of registers on other registers and logic, thus sequentially gating such registers will not require further validation. An automation scheme for MCBCG methodology is also proposed in this paper. Preliminary experiments show up to 30% more savings than the traditional (combinational) clock-gating based power reduction techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信