卡齐纳联邦教学医院放射科常规胸部x线检查患者入口表面剂量的测定。

A. Maaruf, Bashir Gide Muhammed, Ahmed Rufai Usman
{"title":"卡齐纳联邦教学医院放射科常规胸部x线检查患者入口表面剂量的测定。","authors":"A. Maaruf, Bashir Gide Muhammed, Ahmed Rufai Usman","doi":"10.56919/usci.1222.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concern regarding the radiation doses to patients exposed to x-ray during radiography examination has increased on a global scale. With chest x-ray radiography as the most common performed radiography examination, this study assessed the doses patients undergoing chest x-ray radiography are exposed to, through measurement of ESD (entrance surface dose) exposed at radiology department federal, medical center Katsina, using both direct and indirect methods for the purpose of diagnostic reference levels (DRL). Thermoluminescence (TLD) dosimeter is used for the direct measurements, while Tin and Tsai formula (mathematical equation) and CALDODE_X 5.0 software are used for the indirect measurements. The Entrance Surface Dose (ESD) was found to be; Tin and Tsai:  0.15 mGy (Chest AP), 0.12 mGy (Chest PA), 0.21 mGy (Chest lateral), with CALDODE_X: 0.23 mGy (Chest AP), 0.19 mGy (Chest PA), 0.31 mGy (Chest lateral), and TLD: 0.22 mGy (Chest AP), 0.20 mGy (Chest PA), 0.37 mGy (Chest lateral), and were all below the DRLs recommended by national and international regulatory authorities. The comparison of this study with other international and local reference levels shows that the LDRs from this study were lower than other international and local diagnostic reference levels for the three employed methods and for both projections.","PeriodicalId":235595,"journal":{"name":"UMYU Scientifica","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Entrance Surface Dose for Patients Undergoing Conventional Chest X-ray Examination at Radiology Department, Federal Teaching Hospital (FTH) Katsina.\",\"authors\":\"A. Maaruf, Bashir Gide Muhammed, Ahmed Rufai Usman\",\"doi\":\"10.56919/usci.1222.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Concern regarding the radiation doses to patients exposed to x-ray during radiography examination has increased on a global scale. With chest x-ray radiography as the most common performed radiography examination, this study assessed the doses patients undergoing chest x-ray radiography are exposed to, through measurement of ESD (entrance surface dose) exposed at radiology department federal, medical center Katsina, using both direct and indirect methods for the purpose of diagnostic reference levels (DRL). Thermoluminescence (TLD) dosimeter is used for the direct measurements, while Tin and Tsai formula (mathematical equation) and CALDODE_X 5.0 software are used for the indirect measurements. The Entrance Surface Dose (ESD) was found to be; Tin and Tsai:  0.15 mGy (Chest AP), 0.12 mGy (Chest PA), 0.21 mGy (Chest lateral), with CALDODE_X: 0.23 mGy (Chest AP), 0.19 mGy (Chest PA), 0.31 mGy (Chest lateral), and TLD: 0.22 mGy (Chest AP), 0.20 mGy (Chest PA), 0.37 mGy (Chest lateral), and were all below the DRLs recommended by national and international regulatory authorities. The comparison of this study with other international and local reference levels shows that the LDRs from this study were lower than other international and local diagnostic reference levels for the three employed methods and for both projections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":235595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UMYU Scientifica\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UMYU Scientifica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56919/usci.1222.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UMYU Scientifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56919/usci.1222.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,对x射线照射患者的辐射剂量的关注有所增加。由于胸部x线摄影是最常见的影像学检查,本研究通过测量联邦卡齐纳医疗中心放射科的ESD(入口表面剂量),采用直接和间接方法评估接受胸部x线摄影的患者的暴露剂量,以诊断参考水平(DRL)为目的。直接测量采用热释光(TLD)剂量计,间接测量采用Tin和Tsai公式(数学方程)和CALDODE_X 5.0软件。入口表面剂量(ESD)为;Tin和Tsai: 0.15 mGy(胸部AP), 0.12 mGy(胸部PA), 0.21 mGy(胸部侧位),CALDODE_X: 0.23 mGy(胸部AP), 0.19 mGy(胸部PA), 0.31 mGy(胸部侧位),TLD: 0.22 mGy(胸部AP), 0.20 mGy(胸部PA), 0.37 mGy(胸部侧位),均低于国家和国际监管机构推荐的DRLs。本研究与其他国际和当地参考水平的比较表明,本研究的ldr低于其他国际和当地诊断参考水平,对于三种采用的方法和两种预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of Entrance Surface Dose for Patients Undergoing Conventional Chest X-ray Examination at Radiology Department, Federal Teaching Hospital (FTH) Katsina.
Concern regarding the radiation doses to patients exposed to x-ray during radiography examination has increased on a global scale. With chest x-ray radiography as the most common performed radiography examination, this study assessed the doses patients undergoing chest x-ray radiography are exposed to, through measurement of ESD (entrance surface dose) exposed at radiology department federal, medical center Katsina, using both direct and indirect methods for the purpose of diagnostic reference levels (DRL). Thermoluminescence (TLD) dosimeter is used for the direct measurements, while Tin and Tsai formula (mathematical equation) and CALDODE_X 5.0 software are used for the indirect measurements. The Entrance Surface Dose (ESD) was found to be; Tin and Tsai:  0.15 mGy (Chest AP), 0.12 mGy (Chest PA), 0.21 mGy (Chest lateral), with CALDODE_X: 0.23 mGy (Chest AP), 0.19 mGy (Chest PA), 0.31 mGy (Chest lateral), and TLD: 0.22 mGy (Chest AP), 0.20 mGy (Chest PA), 0.37 mGy (Chest lateral), and were all below the DRLs recommended by national and international regulatory authorities. The comparison of this study with other international and local reference levels shows that the LDRs from this study were lower than other international and local diagnostic reference levels for the three employed methods and for both projections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信